SB Prof

Search

New member
Joined
Jan 28, 2009
Messages
3,152
Tokens
* Thursday's NCAA BB picks:
*
Mississippi -3.5* (they're playing at Auburn NOT Mississippi St.)
*
Oregon -3.5
*
Good luck,
Rich
*
 

Banned
Joined
Jul 31, 2009
Messages
906
Tokens
tasker what bet is Mississippi -3.5* tonight A,B,or C......Its A B bet

Also he lost three straight college non system plays I think So tonight Oregon -3.5 looks good since has lost three straight
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
391
Tokens
Hey i dont care if you keep betting your money on bad teams... I hear Thursdays pick is going to be on the East San Fernando Valley Tech Hummingbirds ... dont worry tho the Hummingbirds have a great new 6'2 center who does a great job of opening up driving lanes for their deaf shooting gaurd.

The point im trying to make is that capping a game between teams with nothing to play for but pride is going to be less accurate then capping a game between say Syracuse and Pitt (teams with good players good coaches, big fanbases, final 4 and Nba aspirations and so on.

You can bet on all the scrub teams you like but the fact is the winners so far this system ( Arizona St, Seton Hall,Oklahoma, Santa Clara, UNLV, Purdue, North Carolina) If you stopped betting on horses/-/it teams like Clevland State, the system record is 7-0 with an A bet coming up vs, what 7-2 with a B coming up. Sorry that this clearly upset you, i was just assuming people were like me and didnt enjoy losing money on teams that arent even good enough to have ESPN give a gamecast.

I'm not losing anything because I quit playing it. I was just so amazed by your comment I couldn't believe it. And you don't quit there.

The point im trying to make is that capping a game between teams with nothing to play for but pride is going to be less accurate then capping a game between say Syracuse and Pitt (teams with good players good coaches, big fanbases, final 4 and Nba aspirations and so on.

He's not capping games he's capping point spreads. The system has nothing to do with the teams. You don't even need him to play it. Just look for lines that are -1 or -4 all day.

Do you know why the sportsbooks don't put lines on Ivy League Football like they used to. Because they were getting their brains beat out by teams with nothing to play for but pride, teams without big fan bases, without playoff aspirations, teams with average coaches and players.

The fact is that the books pay much more attention to big games and big names because there is so much more action on these match ups. Some of the best cappers focus on small conferences whereas the books do not.

Sorry, I have never bashed anyone in all the years around this site. You are the first. I suppose it's because I've never read anything that made less sense.
 

New member
Joined
Feb 5, 2009
Messages
196
Tokens
I'm not losing anything because I quit playing it. I was just so amazed by your comment I couldn't believe it. And you don't quit there.

The point im trying to make is that capping a game between teams with nothing to play for but pride is going to be less accurate then capping a game between say Syracuse and Pitt (teams with good players good coaches, big fanbases, final 4 and Nba aspirations and so on.

He's not capping games he's capping point spreads. The system has nothing to do with the teams. You don't even need him to play it. Just look for lines that are -1 or -4 all day.

Do you know why the sportsbooks don't put lines on Ivy League Football like they used to. Because they were getting their brains beat out by teams with nothing to play for but pride, teams without big fan bases, without playoff aspirations, teams with average coaches and players.

The fact is that the books pay much more attention to big games and big names because there is so much more action on these match ups. Some of the best cappers focus on small conferences whereas the books do not.

Sorry, I have never bashed anyone in all the years around this site. You are the first. I suppose it's because I've never read anything that made less sense.

1. If you arent playing it, why would you waste your time on here?
2. Stating the blatantly obvious with big games big name = more action? NO WAY REALLY? ARE YOU SUGGESTING THAT THE SUPERBOWL MIGHT GET MORE BETS THAN Eagles vs Jets preaseason???? WOW NEVER THOUGHT OF THAT!!!
3. You still didnt "bash" anyone, you kinda just wasted more time writing a whole bunch of nothing. The point i made still rings true... that this system is doing far and away better when betting on the bigger programs like UNC, Oklahoma, Etc than it is on teams like Clevland st, Northeastern, North Texas etc.
4. Rock fires and hits! COUNT it and the foul! or you trying to get owned for a third time today? My advice is to come with some facts
 

New member
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Messages
398
Tokens
bet c yet again for NCAA... this kid from arkansas has 33 2nd half points to kill us.. this game was comfortable up 12 with like 6 min left wtf
 

New member
Joined
Jul 8, 2009
Messages
35
Tokens
Wow, I guess we can call this the night of the Marquee Matchups. A lot of the time we'll have selections on games from the non-power conferences. But tonight, all 3 games that fit the system are from the big, power conferences: Big 10, ACC, and SEC.

Let's go over how to bet the Basketball and Football games following the system. Keep in mind that you can also bet each game as a straight bet for the same amount if you so choose. That is why I list ALL eligible games.

But if you want to stick exactly as the system is laid out, you MUST follow the instructions in the PDF below.

I do not write Bet A, Bet B, or Bet C after the games because once we're into the middle of the season what might be your Bet B could be somebody else's Bet A and so on.

For Football and Basketball - games with an * next to them are the strict system bets. I will list the point spread that I am getting down at (and therefore judging my win percentage on) and starting times next to each game. If you can get a better number, then take it.

If your sportsbook is showing a worse number then you may have to buy a half point or more to get the desired spread. If you choose not to, and bet the game anyway - just be aware that I will be judging my won-loss record at the spread I get.

If there are multiple picks on a given day - if you hit an early game, then the next bet would be a Bet A, and so on. If you aren't sure how to use the system, please check out the PDF below.

Some members choose to bet all of my releases, while others choose to stick to the system exactly as it’s laid out below. If there are multiple games going on at once that fit the system, the * lets you know which is the strongest (and therefore the system) play.

http://www.sportsbettingprofessor.com/pdfs/system1.pdf

As always, picks are against the pointspread and not just to win outright. Tuesday's NCAA selections:

North Carolina -1* (this is the Tarheels, the visiting team, not the NC St. Wolfpack)

Michigan St. -3.5 (this is the Spartans, the visiting team, not the Michigan Wolverines)

Kentucky -6.5

INTERESTING, I found this on another forum, and this is not the first time I heard about JM falsifying records. Lots of people who had him for several years all say he is a liar about his records.
[COLOR=#000000 !important]I was going to join you, but after checking your site out Im mad as shit. Listen I had JM mlb 2 years ago and after 7(SEVEN) chase loses I was broke and stopped betting. Then when the mlb season was about 80 % over, JM came out and said ,"if we would have uses the RPI method we would have had NO loses" and from that point on he advertised "0" loses, why do you follow him and show his record as such. HE HAD 7 LOSES that season, now last year he had "0" loses. So please tell the truth. I would like nothing more than to join you, but after I saw what you have posted I want no parts of you. You might be a fine company but you sure to hell DONT have your record straight for the mlb season 2 years ago. Im not bashing you, I think your trying to help us win and make some money for yourself, which is fine with me...just post facts and NOT the bullshit that JM says. Im sure Im no the only person who had JM mlb 2 years ago.. a lot of people are pissed off over the false records that get posted about JM systems. With all do respect I wish you well[/COLOR]
 

New member
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Messages
398
Tokens
yea I am a moron I bet miss st. like an idiot...luckily i skipped the A bet
 

New member
Joined
Feb 5, 2009
Messages
196
Tokens
glen i dont follow, this isnt JM...its rich allen. As far as i have witnessed and heard, his record is exactly what he claims. Also to be fair to JM i had his baseball system and this past year i think was like 60-1 without filter and i wanna say 39-0 without... cant remember the exact numbers but his system was pretty legit for me, and thats his best system because Basketball gets messy with the buying points and what not and some of his hockey lines are just obscence, (-310 A bet? No thanks)
 

New member
Joined
Feb 5, 2009
Messages
196
Tokens
Rich Allen = Sports Betting Proffessor (this thread)
John Morrison= Sports Betting Champ (different thread)
 

New member
Joined
Dec 8, 2009
Messages
23
Tokens
Hawks cover! Although it was over my beloved Celtics. ~~:<<Oh well, business is business. :toast:
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,118,730
Messages
13,558,914
Members
100,675
Latest member
hk101779
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com