Obviously, if the Bulls are a play its almost a gimme to parlay them with the over.Not very likely that a Bulls cover would stay under the number.
I am a bit concerned with the Bulls D. Giving up nearly 400 yards to Temple is not a good thing. Mizzou can name their score here, just hope that the Bulls and Starks can put up 20+. GL with the play
Pinkel was a MAC coach for many years..If he gets a sizable lead he may possibly call off the dogs here..But I'm still not 100 percent convinced about Mizzou's defense. I would be surprised if Buffalo didn't score points here. Mizzou is facing a better passing QB this week.
Everyone and their mother is on Buffalo.
Why?
Cuz they scored in the 20's on Temple and thru up a hail mary to win?
Whats with the lovefest?
Mizzou has the most explosive offense in the country, if they are putting up 50+ on these other teams, then they are putting up 50+ on Buffalo.
I mean how many pts are you guys expecting Buffalo to score?
21?
24?
27?
30?
everyone and their mother is not on buffalo. nor are they on missouri for that matter. not a lot of people like getting involved with 30+ point spreads one way or the other. this is one time i am willing to back an ostensibly overmatched dog. line far too inflated. and if it loses, so be it.
Prodigy,
It opened at Missouri -34, it's down to 31.5, so don't tell me nobody is on Buffalo. It got hit like a son of a bitch.
Plus, every post regarding this game I have seen on here aside from yours considering this game is on Buffalo.
So don't tell me the favor isnt going towards Buffalo.
My question is, why???
A low Division 1 program going cross-country to play a Top 5 power with possibly the best offense in the nation.
Why all the love???
The Luckeyes were lucky to get their one BCS title in the 2003 Fiesta Bowl over the Canes. :nono5:
Truth be told, every Luckeye alum and fan should have Terry "On the Take" Porter (back judge in the game) on their Christmas card list for life. :finger:
And yes, I am a UM alum. :tongue2: