No offense to you...but honestly this statement is just not true at all. This is very, very flawed logic. Each game is an independent event....the fact that ck has picked the winner in the first 4 has no bearing on future games.
No offense to you...but honestly this statement is just not true at all. This is very, very flawed logic. Each game is an independent event....the fact that ck has picked the winner in the first 4 has no bearing on future games.
No offense to you...but honestly this statement is just not true at all. This is very, very flawed logic. Each game is an independent event....the fact that ck has picked the winner in the first 4 has no bearing on future games.
I agree that each game is its own event and what happened before has no bearing on it. But the odds that you win 4 straight games is a lot lower than 3 straight and winning 5 even lower. If your following someone that has one 4 straight and you miss the first 4 the odds are against you.
yes was on the wrong side with indy.dont think i won a game against the cats all yr.i might need to stay off the cats games. look like a 1-1 on these 2 games...ck
I agree that each game is its own event and what happened before has no bearing on it. But the odds that you win 4 straight games is a lot lower than 3 straight and winning 5 even lower. If your following someone that has one 4 straight and you miss the first 4 the odds are against you.
I don't agree with your logic here, but it's funny that you said wait for a loss then tail again, cause technically the indy play was posted first and then the new mexico play.:nohead:
