Rx needs to stand up and do the right thing

Search

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Jan 20, 2002
Messages
6,932
Tokens
I like greenbacks. You guys are like a bunch of kids. Who gives a fuck.
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2007
Messages
99,709
Tokens
I think the "I'm leaving if GB isn't banned" crew sounds a lot more dramatic than it actually is. Let's face it, this site is rapidly declining by the month (people can draw conclusions as to why this is but I'd say someone like GoingBack plays a big role) All of those guys posting volume is way down, it isn't so much that they are saying if GB is still allowed to post then the site has to choose between them or him. It's that they honestly don't care about posting on the site anymore if every thread is just going to be GB spamming and arguing with posters. It's more of a last straw thing and they just rather not bother than some huge emotional stake in the site being GB-free.

He spams the hell out of the site and is an asshole to boot. Any site that he is by far the #1 highest volume poster at is probably going to trend towards sucking.


It's nice to pick and choose who you want around to talk to. ... I think they call that a private chat room. There are plenty of Apps for that

Maybe we should start asking posters who they want here and who they don't
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
It's nice to pick and choose who you want around to talk to. ... I think they call that a private chat room. There are plenty of Apps for that

Maybe we should start asking posters who they want here and who they don't

So bring Vitterd or Guesser back then?

If it doesn't matter who posts and everyone should just ignore, then that should be no problem. Now everyone will post "Vitterd sucks, omg why would you do that?"

Why don't they just man up and deal with it? Atleast he isn't a welcher.

Obviously some of your job is to filter out the bad posters over time. Vitterd fit that criteria, Guesser as well, probably another 500 people over the years. Some of us think GB fits that criteria. If you don't then it is fine, but I think the #'s will speak for themselves over time. Just my opinion.
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,464
Tokens
It's nice to pick and choose who you want around to talk to. ... I think they call that a private chat room. There are plenty of Apps for that

Maybe we should start asking posters who they want here and who they don't

There's only one issue and now many of your loyal posters who've contributed to the community for years and years are leaving. On a forum where honor and loyalty mean a lot to some guys, him being allowed to Welch here and rub JC's face in it are in direct conflict with their values and beliefs. You can't just ignore the problem like it doesn't exist.
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2007
Messages
99,709
Tokens
So bring Vitterd or Guesser back then?

If it doesn't matter who posts and everyone should just ignore, then that should be no problem. Now everyone will post "Vitterd sucks, omg why would you do that?"

Why don't they just man up and deal with it? Atleast he isn't a welcher.

Obviously some of your job is to filter out the bad posters over time. Vitterd fit that criteria, Guesser as well, probably another 500 people over the years. Some of us think GB fits that criteria. If you don't then it is fine, but I think the #'s will speak for themselves over time. Just my opinion.

Well GB's isn't breaking any Rules, He is Mostly Disliked because he posts a massive amount of Photo's ( I believe some times it's too much ) But these aren't against any rules.
Vittered and Guesser were problems, they were disruptive and was disrespectful with an agenda.

I guess GB can be strong headed, but I believe that's when you attack him ( not saying you ), talking in General ..

Hey I even butt heads with him not too long ago, but What am I suppose to do ? Ban him because of it ??

Plus there are plenty of guys on here that dislike each other. If you go Over the top, yeah you could get a vacation. But after a while you just ignore them.

How many time have we allowed the Racist one .... and he was finally banned yet again
I didn't see anyone wanting to leave because they had to read his crap every day....

Now Again I will say, GB should have NOT posted so soon after his Ban Bet .... But like I said, the Mods are not going to come in because of a stupid wager like that.

If there was Money involved, YES
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2007
Messages
99,709
Tokens
There's only one issue and now many of your loyal posters who've contributed to the community for years and years are leaving. On a forum where honor and loyalty mean a lot to some guys, him being allowed to Welch here and rub JC's face in it are in direct conflict with their values and beliefs. You can't just ignore the problem like it doesn't exist.

Listen, I Don't want them to leave, especially over something as foolish as that. But it's a Free Country ... nobody is forced to post here

Like I just posted, there are plenty of Forum wars on here over the years... matter of fact there's a Huge one down in the Poli forum, that's been going on for Years

Nobody is saying I'm going to pack my bags and go home.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2012
Messages
3,214
Tokens
want to talk about a bad bet? i made a bet with a former boss of mine a few years ago- philly vs dc who will win a championship first (of the 4 major sports). we thought we were 2 cursed cities even though the phillies had recently won but were losing everyone. loser of the bet has to get a belly button ring of the winners choice......im a dc fan and currently paying for that bet. i get to take it out when the nba finals or stanley cup are done. dont drink a gamble even if its not money.
 

Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2011
Messages
7,341
Tokens
Man guys. Yea it may be a honor thing but this is a forum with no real names floating out in la la land

Many of of us would have honored the bet , many wouldn’t , it’s not life or death , normal real life goes on , if you must leave because a faceless , might as well be make believe people didn’t hold up “their” bet, I would check myself.

I’m not sure it’s a mod thing. Both posters character may be ruined but what do they care? It’s a place to post and mingle and try to get winners

I agree, I like the offshore here for entertainment alone. Daily life will carry on
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
Well GB's isn't breaking any Rules, He is Mostly Disliked because he posts a massive amount of Photo's ( I believe some times it's too much ) But these aren't against any rules.
Vittered and Guesser were problems, they were disruptive and was disrespectful with an agenda.

I guess GB can be strong headed, but I believe that's when you attack him ( not saying you ), talking in General ..

Hey I even butt heads with him not too long ago, but What am I suppose to do ? Ban him because of it ??

Plus there are plenty of guys on here that dislike each other. If you go Over the top, yeah you could get a vacation. But after a while you just ignore them.

How many time have we allowed the Racist one .... and he was finally banned yet again
I didn't see anyone wanting to leave because they had to read his crap every day....

Now Again I will say, GB should have NOT posted so soon after his Ban Bet .... But like I said, the Mods are not going to come in because of a stupid wager like that.

If there was Money involved, YES

If you think he only attacks people when prompted then we'll have to agree to disagree. That's obviously laughable to me and many others. His asperger like responses to many of us is a big reason we would like to see him banned. But if you think he shouldn't be banned for welching then that's your opinion, not much else to say on the matter.

And obviously someone like Vlad posting does cost the site posters, just because they don't announce when they are leaving doesn't mean that it doesn't. More bad posters = more good posters leave. It's not a hard concept.

As far as the poli forum goes, what do you mean nobody is saying I'm going to pack my bags? Traffic/posts in that part of the site is probably down 90%. Of course people are posting less when the content is bad. Just because they aren't announcing it doesn't mean it isn't happening, most people not gonna be that dramatic about it.

Unless the goal of your site is to lose posters and become a ghost town then banning someone like DaFinch is an absolute no brainer for business purposes.
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2007
Messages
99,709
Tokens
If you think he only attacks people when prompted then we'll have to agree to disagree. That's obviously laughable to me and many others. His asperger like responses to many of us is a big reason we would like to see him banned. But if you think he shouldn't be banned for welching then that's your opinion, not much else to say on the matter.

And obviously someone like Vlad posting does cost the site posters, just because they don't announce when they are leaving doesn't mean that it doesn't. More bad posters = more good posters leave. It's not a hard concept.

As far as the poli forum goes, what do you mean nobody is saying I'm going to pack my bags? Traffic/posts in that part of the site is probably down 90%. Of course people are posting less when the content is bad. Just because they aren't announcing it doesn't mean it isn't happening, most people not gonna be that dramatic about it.

Unless the goal of your site is to lose posters and become a ghost town then banning someone like DaFinch is an absolute no brainer for business purposes.

Well if you Think We should Ban someone because he lost a Ban Bet with another Poster, Then I have nothing else to say except that's the most ridiculous thing I ever heard on here.

Here's some food for thought ....... Over the Year + that a bunch of you have had problems with Greenbacks....

NOT ONE Report a Post on him.

outside of any Recent posts by him ( since the ban bet ) Not ONE Complaint by PM other than him Posting too many Photo's
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
Well if you Think We should Ban someone because he lost a Ban Bet with another Poster, Then I have nothing else to say except that's the most ridiculous thing I ever heard on here.

Here's some food for thought ....... Over the Year + that a bunch of you have had problems with Greenbacks....

NOT ONE Report a Post on him.

outside of any Recent posts by him ( since the ban bet ) Not ONE Complaint by PM other than him Posting too many Photo's

Fair enough. Like I said, that's your opinion. I don't have much else to add other than I think the site would be better without him in his current form.

But not a big deal either way.
 

Banned
Joined
Jan 15, 2018
Messages
905
Tokens
Read this thread more than once now. Clearly if you make a bet in any capacity whether it be at a casino, online, or with a friend you MUST know who you are wagering with. Case in point you sign up for a low rated book and win. Then you ask for a payout. You wait weeks, months...eventually you get slow paid, or maybe not paid ever. Guess What? Bad move on your behalf for trusting the book to fulfill their end of the agreement. Same thing here..if you make a wager between someone either whom you know only via the RX and have never met in person(or anyone )..well the rule applies.
The RX has not and will not mediate between two consenting individuals and their respective wagers between themselves. We understand the depth of this thread and that many are not happy, but there is nothing we can do to ease this disagreement.
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,464
Tokens
Listen, I Don't want them to leave, especially over something as foolish as that. But it's a Free Country ... nobody is forced to post here

Like I just posted, there are plenty of Forum wars on here over the years... matter of fact there's a Huge one down in the Poli forum, that's been going on for Years

Nobody is saying I'm going to pack my bags and go home.

If many quality posters leave over this it's bad for RX business.
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2007
Messages
99,709
Tokens
If many quality posters leave over this it's bad for RX business.

In that's the case, maybe they should grow up

We have had many people over the years that dislike people, can't just Ban them because of that.

We hate to lose anyone over something like this, but like I said, the main complaint is he posts too many Pictures !!
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,464
Tokens
In that's the case, maybe they should grow up

We have had many people over the years that dislike people, can't just Ban them because of that.

We hate to lose anyone over something like this, but like I said, the main complaint is he posts too many Pictures !!

I don't think the photos thing is the issue here. This isn't just a dislike thing either which is pretty clear.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
Read this thread more than once now. Clearly if you make a bet in any capacity whether it be at a casino, online, or with a friend you MUST know who you are wagering with. Case in point you sign up for a low rated book and win. Then you ask for a payout. You wait weeks, months...eventually you get slow paid, or maybe not paid ever. Guess What? Bad move on your behalf for trusting the book to fulfill their end of the agreement. Same thing here..if you make a wager between someone either whom you know only via the RX and have never met in person(or anyone )..well the rule applies.
The RX has not and will not mediate between two consenting individuals and their respective wagers between themselves. We understand the depth of this thread and that many are not happy, but there is nothing we can do to ease this disagreement.

I thought if someone welches on a $ bet then they get banned? Tons of people have been banned in the past for that IIRC.
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,464
Tokens
Read this thread more than once now. Clearly if you make a bet in any capacity whether it be at a casino, online, or with a friend you MUST know who you are wagering with. Case in point you sign up for a low rated book and win. Then you ask for a payout. You wait weeks, months...eventually you get slow paid, or maybe not paid ever. Guess What? Bad move on your behalf for trusting the book to fulfill their end of the agreement. Same thing here..if you make a wager between someone either whom you know only via the RX and have never met in person(or anyone )..well the rule applies.
The RX has not and will not mediate between two consenting individuals and their respective wagers between themselves. We understand the depth of this thread and that many are not happy, but there is nothing we can do to ease this disagreement.

Well, yes there is. To say there isn't anything you can do is just not correct.
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2007
Messages
99,709
Tokens
I thought if someone welches on a $ bet then they get banned? Tons of people have been banned in the past for that IIRC.

Drew is new to The RX, so he doesn't know what we did in the past.

But I believe he is talking about the RX being responsible for a debt/wager between two posters.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,116,547
Messages
13,534,594
Members
100,373
Latest member
esmefurnishings3
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com