Rubber Room

[gtc08]

The funny thing is it's not bashing. GBPackerfan wanted to know his record, I looked it up and said he is a good MNF fade which 1-6 record is. This is a statement based on fact with prior results backing it up.

 

[quantumleap]

Wrong....absolutely 100% wrong. If you don't have something constructive to add, stay out of other peoples threads, or we'll help you do so.

Actually I'm glad he posted CW's MNF record. While 6 picks isn't statistically significant, neither would be his 6-0 record yesterday. Hey, we all have good streaks and bad streaks. This just made me realize this wasn't a lock because of CW's record yesterday. But to say he's a good fade isn't accurate either for the same reason.

 

[TTinCO]

I understand QL. My point was that just because someone posts their plays, they are not "fair game"-especially not from shot taker who doesn't have the balls to post their own plays.

 

[passingthewind]

Hmmm

I don't post picks because I don't care to post picks. I have no need to market myself to other people on a sports forum. Anyone who does though is fair game. He's 1-6 on Monday night games, a good fade, if you don't agree with it, oh well, but the record is there for you.

Market yourself, in case you have not figured out, he and alot of others do not use this forum as a market. Alot of people use this forum to post to socialize, post plays that they are playing and like to post them. But I do know that he is a solid capper, and if he is not good on Monday night, well so be it, but you still are a dunce cap, and maybe tonight he will be 2-6 on Monday nights. I also find it hard to believe that someone would go back that far into his Monday night record unless mabye they were playing his plays and felt the need to spend fruitless time posting the Monday night plays, in other words, who cares.



uppy:

 

[natural1]

I understand QL. My point was that just because someone posts their plays, they are not "fair game"-especially not from shot taker who doesn't have the balls to post their own plays.

:missingte:missingte:missingte

 

[quantumleap]

I understand QL. My point was that just because someone posts their plays, they are not "fair game"-especially not from shot taker who doesn't have the balls to post their own plays.

Agreed.

:toast:

 

[gtc08]

Market yourself, in case you have not figured out, he and alot of others do not use this forum as a market. Alot of people use this forum to post to socialize, post plays that they are playing and like to post them. But I do know that he is a solid capper, and if he is not good on Monday night, well so be it, but you still are a dunce cap, and maybe tonight he will be 2-6 on Monday nights. I also find it hard to believe that someone would go back that far into his Monday night record unless mabye they were playing his plays and felt the need to spend fruitless time posting the Monday night plays, in other words, who cares.



uppy:

It took me maybe 2 minutes to find his plays. You really think it takes 2 hours to do a search eh?

 

[passingthewind]

Also the marketing thing did not sit well, that was a bit stong considering he does do his homework to come up with the plays, if you think he just types like that and has no clue what he is doing, well maybe you just do not see it the right way.

 

[passingthewind]

No

It took me maybe 2 minutes to find his plays. You really think it takes 2 hours to do a search eh?

No, why waste your time on it, because you wanted to add some negative comments to the thread, if not you would not have added about fair game and marketing, have a good day.

uppy:

 

[gtc08]

Also the marketing thing did not sit well, that was a bit stong considering he does do his homework to come up with the plays, if you think he just types like that and has no clue what he is doing, well maybe you just do not see it the right way.

Maybe a bit strong. I think marketing more of gynecologist who will bump his thread 20 times during the week and continually brag about how good he is.

 

[old_school23]

Think of it like this. If the guy is red hot, and he is 1-6 on Monday Night...isn't he due? I mean seriously do you think he will continue to lose on Mondays only wtf?

 

[Mosi]

Be careful guys, in a fight I think a bear would be able to eat the cardinal.....

uppy:

Have you ever seen a Bear eat a Cardinal? How would the Bear even catch the Cardinal? Would it sneak up the ree and it while it slept in its nest? What if the Cardinal was flying really fast and not watching where it was flying and flew right into the Bears eye? Maybe right into its mouth. J ust haven't seen many Bears fighting Cardinals.

 

[gtc08]

Think of it like this. If the guy is red hot, and he is 1-6 on Monday Night...isn't he due? I mean seriously do you think he will continue to lose on Mondays only wtf?

No idea and I honestly don't care. Like I said, I only brought up his record because GBpackerfan wanted to know how he did. Now I got some ttinco jumping on my balls because he thinks I took a shot at his boy.

 

[PoppinFresh]

Also, Leinart is a good white Christian. God will smite the Bears tonight.

(Edit-unnecessary)

Idiot. If you want to get schooled in your ignorant comments we can take this to a religious forum.

 

[gtc08]

ill lay 2:1 odds that I get banned if coldweather doesn't win tonight.

 

[teazeman]

ill lay 2:1 odds that I get banned if coldweather doesn't win tonight.

I'll lay 5:1 nobody gives a fcuk.

 

[X-Files]

Maybe a bit strong. I think marketing more of gynecologist who will bump his thread 20 times during the week and continually brag about how good he is.

CW doesn't need to bump his...he's got you.

 

[natural1]

No idea and I honestly don't care. Like I said, I only brought up his record because GBpackerfan wanted to know how he did. Now I got some ttinco jumping on my balls because he thinks I took a shot at his boy.

Dumbass......."fade" ring a bell?

 

[teazeman]

thanks for moving this shit!

 

[SkinsRaj28]

Teazman, stop causing trouble. Stupid online bully.