Royal smear campaign, the definition of irresponsibility

Search

ODU GURU
Joined
Feb 26, 1999
Messages
20,881
Tokens
Boston1,

If you owned a watchdog site, would you promote Royal at this time?

A simple yes or no will do.

That's really ALL that this is about...

THE SHRINK
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
4,509
Tokens
LANDER LMAO

pirates-xl.jpg
 

There's always next year, like in 75, 90-93, 99 &
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
15,270
Tokens
LMFAO!!!
applaudit.gif


Thanks alot guys - I was just about to go to bed too ... & now I'm stuck with thoughts of Russy-poo and his band of ass-pirates
1053174822.gif
 

New member
Joined
Nov 20, 1999
Messages
511
Tokens
Lander,

I know that you, as well as the drones, have a biased interest and it's hard for somebody like youself to understand that not everybody serves a master on these forums.

I never made one comment about NAB, ever, expect for being continually amazed at how Lance conducted himself. In fact, at this forum, many ages ago , I got into it with him when he was at Skybook. You wouldn't remember that because you were still in middle school, or law school, or whatever your story of the week was.

If anybody that questions your master is a ' MW Ass-pirate', then so be it. You make yourself look foolish when you paint any dissenter with that brush.

Boston,

Why in the world would anybody take SBR's 'list' seriously? Ol' Buzz is a real gem. He claims to be totally unbiased and that he doesn't take any compensation and that his affiliate program doesn't affect anything he does. No, really, that makes no difference. Neither does a simple dinner. Naw, he's not so cheap to be bought like that. His site is a total and complete joke and nearly anybody associated with this biz laughs at him.





<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by lander:
This one is beyond belief ...

Ken didn't act proactively & assume the worse with NAB & the MW clique of ass-pirates spew on about it for months ...

Now Ken is trying to protect the posters (and losing an advertiser in the process) and the MW clique of ass-pirates are STILL complaining.

C'mmon girls - let's start showing some consistantcy with your bitching ... wait, BETTER IDEA ..

How about Kosar, SP V, & TTinco ALL send Royal 5 dimes EACH ... since they're "obviously" so safe and this is just a "fabriated smear campaign by Ken"???

By all means - deposit away girls
icon_wink.gif
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
623
Tokens
I absolutley would not support Royal on a Watchdog site. On the other hand I would not have beaten this Dead Horse the way Royal's been beaten day after day after day. Warning has been rightfully given to the Players concerning Royal and now its time to move on until further developments take place. Royal has made some poor management decisions to say the least and will have a very hard time finding replacemnts in the likes of Scotty and Marty. Customer Service will suffer somewhat but until there are more than isolated slow pays, let these guys conduct their business.

Olympic would like to see an adverse sale develop with Royal so that they can come in to buy Royal in a hardship sale. Royal and Olympic must resolve their differences out of court. Everyone is a loser if this goes to court.
 

Another Day, Another Dollar
Joined
Mar 1, 2002
Messages
42,730
Tokens
I still say MW is a good site, but with bad leadership.

SBR is a fine contribution to the offshore players.

Kosar, you are reaching buddy.
 

There's always next year, like in 75, 90-93, 99 &
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
15,270
Tokens
I know that you, as well as the drones, have a biased interest and it's hard for somebody like youself to understand that not everybody serves a master on these forums.
I have a biased inserest in not getting stiffed, but apparently you don't. I will assume you will be posting up with Royal VERY SOON, right? Well, that's great news - now Royal can flip your $1.75 in lunch money and payout .0002% to one of the RX poster
1036316054.gif


I never made one comment about NAB, ever, expect for being continually amazed at how Lance conducted himself. In fact, at this forum, many ages ago , I got into it with him when he was at Skybook. You wouldn't remember that because you were still in middle school, or law school, or whatever your story of the week was.
Story of the week? I've never claimed to be in law school spanky ... by all means since your on the "private dick" kick tonight, why don't you dig up some of these stories? Well, I mean, if that's ok with Russy-poo
icon_wink.gif


If anybody that questions your master is a ' MW Ass-pirate', then so be it. You make yourself look foolish when you paint any dissenter with that brush.
I look like foolish? Hey, I just post were decent people run the site ... you want to talk about masters - your little "master" sent you half way across the internet to start stupid threads bashing his competition
icon_wink.gif
You don't see me posting in your shit hole ... makes you wonder who's the one carrying out orders, huh spanky?
 

Another Day, Another Dollar
Joined
Mar 1, 2002
Messages
42,730
Tokens
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> On the other hand I would not have beaten this Dead Horse the way Royal's been beaten day after day after day. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Shrink made a post and the critics came gathering. It was the fault of the those who wanted to deface Shrink that caused the onslaught that followed.

The Rx is simply defending its stance.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 20, 1999
Messages
511
Tokens
Lander,

If you don't find anything strange about the timing, then that's your call. Again, I understand that you will vigorously defend this site no matter what. But I have to tell you, thinking for yourself every now and then does wonders.
 

There's always next year, like in 75, 90-93, 99 &
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
15,270
Tokens
Kosar,
I have to be honest with you - that green dress makes you look a little fat
icon_frown.gif
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,026
Tokens
Hey Shrink,

Half the books on earth are one bad football season away from broke,

that puts Royal in the same class as half your advertisers.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,026
Tokens
Hey Shrink,

One out of five books on earth are one bad football season away from broke,

that puts Royal in the same class as 20% your advertisers.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,026
Tokens
NeilM the quote refers to sportsbooks not schemes. anyway 1 for a million is virtually zilch.
icon_biggrin.gif


[This message was edited by Sodium Pentethol V on July 28, 2003 at 02:16 AM.]
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,026
Tokens
BTW nice to see no ghosts,

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>kosar - you M.W. Polluter...I don't work for the Rx or have a stake in it either way.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

But I am somehow compensated by ROyal, asshole? and somehow have to have a stake in it to express my opinion.

SBR-posting the facts and implying that a place is facing imminent demise are two separate animals.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,028
Tokens
SP,
OK, fair enough. I have not seen anyone post that Royal is "facing imminent demise" statement. I for one have from the start made the case that they will survive or be bought out. I know of at least one firm offer that Royal has turned down outside of what's been reported.

I still think its fair for players to be warned that there is considerable risk. That seems fair.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
5,412
Tokens
Sodium and kosar,

Why can't you guys just focus on the issue? Is Royal having financial problems or is it not?

If it is, then there is no amount of posting which is excessive since a single player who misses out on this important information is one player too many.

If it is not, then tell us why. Don't just tell us how we should wait until Dec. etc. Nobody is doing the timing deliberately and you know it. Nobody owes a troubled sportsbook a chance to get out of its doldrums. The sportsbook should have thought about that a long, long time ago. When the troubles start it's simply too late. Sorry. Players deserve 100% security and that means huge capitalization with cash to spare everywhere they look. Players take enough risk betting on the games. They should have absolutely zero tolerance for risk on their post up capital.

Any book that can't meet this standard deserves everything they have coming to it.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,026
Tokens
Darryl at least one out of 5 books is one bad football season away from going broke,

OK, the wait till december line is applicable to at least 20% of all sportsbooks. Not just Royal.

Yea alot of books have money problems this time of year, it comes from an advertising blitz before football and low juice MLB, and some get healthy during football, some don't.

The point is to single out Royal, implying imminent bankruptcy immediately preceeding FB is irresponsible.

Hey if Spiro thought it an attractive enough property to buy, enough so to actually put up cash, why wouldn't he just wait and get the ultimate bargain once they were already done?

I will not deny that he is the AM Best of this industry and his no transfers with ROyal may be an accuarate forecast of upcoming doom,

but given the history of sportsbetting that seems highly unlikely to happen at least till the conclusion of football, and a good season cures alot of probelms.

And to be perfectly honest, I could virtually care less.

The timing though is remarkable.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,983
Messages
13,575,755
Members
100,889
Latest member
junkerb
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com