It's probably true that he played everybody like a piano. The guy is a communications major from Stanford, so he knew what he was doing. He never looked away from the camera and never cursed. The problem I see with him is after accomplishing the things he already done in life, why does he feel the need to act like a thug, whether it be fake or not? That part of it doesn't make sense to me. He could have just as easily answered her questions in a calm matter and declared himself the best CB out there without the tirade..That would have went over much better with me than screaming at the camera like a 14 year old.He actually graduated in the top 2% of his class. You already know he's Stanford alum as a communications major. He's playing you all like a piano.
Once again you are misinformed. Browner has been suspended for PEDs a year ago. He then got caught with a substance abuse suspension after that.
"Non-PED suspensions come after a player already has either tested positive for a banned substance or has been arrested previously. In Browner’s case, to receive a one-year suspension likely means he was a three-time violator in some fashion. "
Keep trying to re-wrote history. Seahawks tried to cheat the trademark and only started paying the license fee when they settled out of court AFTER they got sued.
Again is it that I am misinformed or has your inability to read and comprehend let you down yet again.
So of actual starters we've got Browner x 2 let me write it again so you can read it So of actual starters we've got Browner x 2 and lets go a third time so it sinks in So of actual starters we've got Browner x 2...thats from the original post. That is 2 suspensions in his time with the hawks which I clearly noted. 1 of which for weed which I noted, the other counted in the Adderall total also noted. Browner was suspended 3 x during his career but one was when he was with denver so not on the seahawks count so his 3 suspensions are irrelevant to this conversation as we're talking about 2. 3 adderall suspensions, 2 guys who either didn't touch the field at all or did so in scrub minutes and are barely relevant other than they played for the hawks so you get to include them. 2 for weed. 7 suspensions. 3 starters accounting for actual game enhancing ped use. So keep clinging to the word most when you break down the most it's a flimsy argument and the majority of people should be able to see that.
And nobody is re-writing history, many teams used the 12th man until A&M decided they were getting more publicity out of it than their university and sent out the desist orders, hawks didn't believe they were in violation which their counsel must have advised as no team operates and makes those decisions without counsel, in the end they were so hawks worked out a licensing deal. Business complete. Hawks are legally using the name, A&M gets paid, only one crying about it, you. It's a weak ass argument to show the team is operating in some underhanded manner continuously if all you have is one isolated case that got resolved to the mutual satisfaction of both parties.
and again I've pointed out the silliness of your only points. So again I will bow out of a pointless argument with you as I don't believe you have the ability to understand when you're wrong, nor the character to admit it. Good day.
Great Corner no doubt. Its a shame he has to act that way. Yes that IS a thug. All he did was create about 10 million denver fans and possibly make the line move a half point.
You've convinced me. An organization with ZERO PED suspensions is the exact same as one with 3 starters that have been suspended. There is no point in identifying the team that has the most suspension in the NFL since it's only by a player or two. I'm shocked and upset at myself for not realizing that a team that employs zero previously suspended players is the same as a team that has 1, 2, or even 7 players that have been suspended. My apologies for being too dense to see that they are in fact the exact same thing and should play no role in judging a team or its players. Oh and Sherman is obviously not in that count because he didn't get suspended which means 100% he never took anything. Just like OJ is innocent of murder because he was found not guilty, Sherman never took any amphetamines because he won his appeal. Obviously when the piss leaked out of the cup and was put into another cup, some type of amphetamine jumped in there. I agree 100%.
I also now believe Sherman really is a genius. To have been able to get into Stanford with his mediocre test scores amazes me. Seriously, I do give him props for that.
shermans post game behavior sure didnt look or sound sportsmanlike, but in his defense maybe we dont have all the facts that led up to this latest incident with crabtree. Nobody here as ever been instigated to act out of character? Does he always act like this after shutting down receivers? ,,,,a quote from his point of view " I saw a hockey game where they just threw the hockey puck aside and everyone started fighting and you calling me a thug?"