+1
Stupid stupid play last night may have cost him 5-10 games.
No reason to attack Humphries in that situation. Get in his face and tell him what you think of him, but to bull rush him into the stands was plain dumb. Humphries received a technical for the intentional foul. That should have been the end of it.
Team will miss him over the next bunch of games and now the Celts have an uphill climb to stay in the hunt.
actually nobody said that the celtics won the title because Rondo carried them on his back. It's just yet another case of Enfuego twisting around the context of what others say to help prove his point.
Go back and look at the post. I simply said (1) rondo has a ring and (2) he has the capability of lifting his teammates on his back and making them better players where I don't see that from Chris Paul
Go back and look at the post. I simply said (1) rondo has a ring and (2) he has the capability of lifting his teammates on his back and making them better players where I don't see that from Chris Paul
Another poster upset over some other thread so he gets his big panties in a wad and cries about it somewhere else. This forum is very predictable.
You said he has a ring and seems to carry his teammates on his back which implies he has a ring because he carried his teammates on his back which we all know he didn't do.
Actually it doesn't imply anything. It means that rondo has a ring. And that rondo carries his team on his back. Notice that on my post these two statements are not only not in the same sentence, but are spaced out by several lines; conveying that there is no relationship between them
Seems to me that you aren't the sharpest tool in the shed based on some of your posts in this forum. Let me know the next time you would like me to clarify the meaning of words and context for you. I did volunteer work in special education while in college so I have experience teaching the slower folks like yourself.
A) Has a ring in one sentence and carries his teammates in the next. Several lines?
B) I'm not sharp? You think it's ok to shoot someone in the chest and when they lie on the ground gasping for air you think it's ok to shoot them underneath their chin to kill them. I'm not sharp?
Dude, I know you haven't been here a long time but just attacking a fellow poster's intelligence because you differ in opinions is just juvenile. You'll figure it out if you stick around long enough though.
Again, where in there does it say that I think a girl should get shot under the chin while on the ground bleeding to death. I said that If you break into someone's house and are shot or killed, you are getting what you deserved for committing that crime. I repeatedly said in that forum that I don't agree with the execution style killing.
And don't even try to say I "just call people names when they disagree with me" Everyone on this forum knows that your're a complete piece of shit. A debate is one thing, but I don't take lightly to someone accusing me of saying I think its cool to kill wounded girls.
