Question about the Dez call....

Search

Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Messages
996
Tokens
Quantumleap and Akphidelt: You make a good point. Thanks for not name-calling. I still think he had it, fumbled it, and recovered it in the endzone. Then, again, I'm a long-suffering Cowboy fan.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
19,007
Tokens
That's exactly what I thought originally until I read the rule posted by scottcarter. The rule reads "act of catching the pass". Dez was falling the whole time, including taking the steps and reaching out, so all of that is considered part of the reception as well as his knee touching and his putting the ball on the ground and the ball coming out.

It doesn't matter if he makes a football move or his knee is down or he crosses the goal line (same rule applies if the receiver is completely in the end zone) it's all a part of the reception. We've seen receivers catch a ball falling down and getting 2 feet in bounds and rolling over out of bounds but if the ball comes out at the end it's ruled as an incomplete pass.



Rules are rules, that's fine, but we all know this exact same play could happen in another game & the refs will see it the other way.......I for one was debating whether it was a catch, but there's more to it. Its what the refs want to change or not change.

If they don't over turn the catch, are we talking about this rule?

Refs are as crooked as can be.......that catch would have set Dallas up for a score & taken the game over the total & given Dallas the lead for the moment.......
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
19,007
Tokens
Full speed, it's clear he never had complete control throughout the entire process of the catch. In slo mo you can kind of make an argument.

dez2.0.gif




You guys make good points, but it all comes fown to what the refs want to call.......ive see this kind of play a lot be called both ways, a catch & an inconplete catch.
 

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2010
Messages
9,660
Tokens
AK....I think he gains control of the ball at the 4 and loses it when he tries to reach for the goal line. I am not arguing about the call, I just think if he extends it 1 more foot it's called a TD. Seen that play many times. I do agree karma is a crazy thing.

Junk47.....nobody is whining. I brought the topic up mainly for discussion if he would have broke the plane they would have deemed he had possession and the ground caused the fumble. I don't think it made a difference ATS.....but I expect nothing more from you.
 

Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2006
Messages
16,073
Tokens
It was the right call according to the rules. It's even better because it was against Dallas.
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,149
Tokens
I wanted the Cowboys to win, but if he doesn't maintain possession when he hits the ground, the rules say it's incomplete
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,149
Tokens
This is the official rule on receptions in the NFL:

"If a player goes to the ground in the act of catching a pass (with or without contact by an opponent), he must maintain control of the ball after he touches the ground, whether in the field of play or the end zone. If he loses control of the ball, and the ball touches the ground before he regains control, the pass is incomplete. If he regains control prior to the ball touching the ground, the pass is complete."


Basically what that means is simple. If a player goes to the ground while in the process of making a catch, he must control the ball all the way through until his momentum from the fall ends. If at any point before his momentum stops he loses control of the ball and it touches the ground, the pass is incomplete.

this, if it hit the ground (and moved) it's incomplete
 

New member
Joined
Sep 9, 2011
Messages
204
Tokens
He caught the fucking ball took 3 steps and his knee touched before the ball come loose. He was down inside the one yard line. PERIOD!

Yeah what ever happened to it has to be CONCLUSIVE and DEFINITE to overturn. It sure looked to me, as a Raiders fan (unbiased and didn't bet this game) sure looked to me he took 2+ steps first of all, and secondly his one hand was underneath the ball the entire time, even when the ball did move, his hand was always underneath it. How can the referee be 100% sure that his hand wasn't ? It was very clear on the replay his hand was under the ball, even though the ball did shift around.


Sucks for Dallas, but they shouldnt have even been here if the refs didn't do it for them last week.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 17, 2011
Messages
2,170
Tokens
Does anyone think that was the absolute worst play call? Season on the line and you throw a jump ball fade route? I know it almost worked but seems like they would have had a more conventional play call to keep the drive going.
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,149
Tokens
well that says if he loses control of the ball which Dez never did. always had his hand under it. so it was always under control IMO, hence why he hung onto it.

plausible, if what you say is true, then it was a catch

my friends were making that argument, I just didn't think it would stand
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
19,007
Tokens
Does anyone think that was the absolute worst play call? Season on the line and you throw a jump ball fade route? I know it almost worked but seems like they would have had a more conventional play call to keep the drive going.



Thought about that an hour after the game.....I was watching highlights & thinking, why would the coach call a fade route 25 yards down field on 4th & short.......

A nice pass in the middle for a 1st down, or a boot leg (watch Flacco do it all the time with success)
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,899
Tokens
This play represents everything I hate about the modern NFL. It was a spectacular play and exhibition of talent, yet due to byzantine rules and replay, a team's whole season goes by the wayside and fans are left wondering.

It sucks.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 17, 2012
Messages
690
Tokens
grunching here.....

but i think he'd already completed the catch of the ball when he hit the ground. and esp. if it's determined he's stretching out for end zone. no one would try to simulatenously sp? catch the ball and lunge for end zone.

not a dez fan at all, but the truth is the truth....
 

Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Messages
996
Tokens
After reviewing the video I see the same Bryant I've seen many times. Last year, Romo hits Dez in the end zone, 50 yard pass, not time left. Dez gets one foot down. Then before he gets his second foot down, he puts his f*****g hand down beyond the endzon to catch himself. Review...no catch. No playoffs.

This video shows him putting his had down instead of using both hands to demonstrate control of the ball.
Leaves it up to the refs. Review..no catch. No NFC championship game. He always protects himself. Hope his hand is ok so he can enjoy the off-season.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
19,007
Tokens
Heard on a radio station that the NFL will be looking to change the rule if a catch in the off season......it will basically consist of catching the ball with 2 feet down, no more making a stupid football move & taking 10 steps or what ever joke they equate a football move is, because they're always twisting the rule around to benefit the outcome of the game to their advantage.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 24, 2012
Messages
250
Tokens
Dez was still going to the ground, outstretched arm and all. The rule makes sense to me... that the receiver must come down with the ball and maintain possession after hitting the ground. Neither Dez nor Megatron did that.

Not many of you are considering plays where a receiver has 2 hands on the ball with 2 feet down, gets drilled immediately, and the ball pops out. Is that a catch? or a fumble? What about when a receiver has 2 hands on the ball and on the way down to the ground, the defender pulls it loose?

I think the NFL may change the wording of the rule, but neither of those will be catches. Maintaining control after hitting the ground is a crucial component for the play to be ruled a catch.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
19,007
Tokens
Dez was still going to the ground, outstretched arm and all. The rule makes sense to me... that the receiver must come down with the ball and maintain possession after hitting the ground. Neither Dez nor Megatron did that.

Not many of you are considering plays where a receiver has 2 hands on the ball with 2 feet down, gets drilled immediately, and the ball pops out. Is that a catch? or a fumble? What about when a receiver has 2 hands on the ball and on the way down to the ground, the defender pulls it loose?

I think the NFL may change the wording of the rule, but neither of those will be catches. Maintaining control after hitting the ground is a crucial component for the play to be ruled a catch.


Dez made a football move by taking steps after catching the ball & then lunging......whether the refs & others see it another way & are twisting the rules of how many steps, etc...need to be is absurd.

We as humans will always disagree......that's our human nature. What baffles me is that the public is brainwashed into thinking whatever the ref says goes.

Commentators on TV will always back the refs decision if they care at all about their jobs.

None the less, Dallas covered the spread, but the refs seem to be on the wring side of this BS every week......they screwed the Lions 2 weeks ago. They keep screwing the fans.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,877
Messages
13,574,593
Members
100,879
Latest member
am_sports
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com