i would pick that it was 12 people who probably knew and would never admit it. they must be all dead by now.
TWELVE PEOPLE???
Were Armstrong and Aldrin two of them or were they dupes too? You're suggesting that only 12 people conspired to trick thousands and thousands of NASA SCIENTISTS into pulling off a fake landing? And not a single ONE of the NASA SCIENTISTS were able to figure it out?
well they weren't smart enough to retain the records of the whole thing and don't have the ability to do it again apparently or is it the funding excuse.TWELVE PEOPLE???
Were Armstrong and Aldrin two of them or were they dupes too? You're suggesting that only 12 people conspired to trick thousands and thousands of NASA SCIENTISTS into pulling off a fake landing? And not a single ONE of the NASA SCIENTISTS were able to figure it out?
obviously a studio production. the clarity was outstanding yet when they were farting around on the moon it was grainy and barely visible. this proves nothing. there was no jumping around at mission control when they landed and none of them seemed that excited about it. they had a couple of close calls and all the subsequent trips were pulled off without a hitch. 1960's technology at it's finest.
it was dated 2019 at the end so that led me to the conclusion that is when it was produced. probably for the 50th anniversary of the hoax no doubt. very slick job. no way that was original footage from 1969. yet you say that was actual footage. i'd admit they did go to the moon before i believe that was shot 50 years ago. way too clear, concise and full of drama.
what does that have to do with that freshly released video you presented. i said those convo's were hypothetical. you claim that video was actual footage. stick to the subject at hand."overheard conversations", only 12 people pulled it off, your ridiculous conclusions about cameras and media used. you know something? you were right when you said you were here for the entertainment. It turns out, you *are* the entertainment. what else you got?
what does that have to do with that freshly released video you presented. i said those convo's were hypothetical. you claim that video was actual footage. stick to the subject at hand.
video I presented? what video was this? you're not paying attention, man, you reached the limit of rational thought yesterday, certainly not any better today. have you learned of any other 'overheard conversations' today that totally explain away your delusional fantasies?