I would appreciate the e-mails. I would also agree that football is the place where there are more consistent fades are as I believe that there are more squares who bet football than any of the other sports and there are more ties to names of teams such as Nebraska, Florida State, and the St. Louis Rams. I would like to quantify it if I could and start keeping better records. Tell me when you get it.
Well I am not sure that KC was the consensus Hilton play. Anyway you can get that for free. Here is the link. The games usually go like 6 wins and 1 loss out of the top 7 selections each week.
I dont play a game unless I like it as well, but Atlanta and Baltimore was some of my biggest plays of the day besides Oakland. I also had Cincy earlier in the week at +11.
But yes, EVEN I lost with KC.
90% of the people in this forum will love this site each week, the new picks are up at about 10 pm on Friday night
http://www.nss.net/hilton_lines.asp
I dont play a game unless I like it as well, but Atlanta and Baltimore was some of my biggest plays of the day besides Oakland. I also had Cincy earlier in the week at +11.
But yes, EVEN I lost with KC.
90% of the people in this forum will love this site each week, the new picks are up at about 10 pm on Friday night
http://www.nss.net/hilton_lines.asp
I didn't say KC was the consensus play for Hilton.. KC was a big local fade here. Vegas Insider you pay for, Hilton is free I think.
Put your email address up again, got sidetracked for a minute..
Anti public
Philly +7
We have SF action at nearly 6-1 in parlays and straight bets. Normally I would play Philly pretty hard BUT......... The monday Night game after a weekend where the public gets pounded it seems they win Monday night. I will play Philly but it will be a smaller then normal play
Edmonton +.5 +135
Chicago +.5 +135
San Jose +.5 -110
Now it does not mean I would play all these. Before I even research what everyone is playing I first find the plays that the square in me likes.
I don't really care for the way SJ is playing right now so I will pass.
I will bet Chicago, Clorado has been terrible at home and more importantly I will be on the other side of the public
I happen to know being a wings fan they usually do not play well the first game back from a road trip. The square in me would say Detroit looks easy so I will fade myself and play Edm
Philly +7
We have SF action at nearly 6-1 in parlays and straight bets. Normally I would play Philly pretty hard BUT......... The monday Night game after a weekend where the public gets pounded it seems they win Monday night. I will play Philly but it will be a smaller then normal play
Edmonton +.5 +135
Chicago +.5 +135
San Jose +.5 -110
Now it does not mean I would play all these. Before I even research what everyone is playing I first find the plays that the square in me likes.
I don't really care for the way SJ is playing right now so I will pass.
I will bet Chicago, Clorado has been terrible at home and more importantly I will be on the other side of the public
I happen to know being a wings fan they usually do not play well the first game back from a road trip. The square in me would say Detroit looks easy so I will fade myself and play Edm
Thank You.
I would not be surprised if Philadelphia wins this game outright.
Eagles defense will be too much, and San Fran has no kicking game.
/infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif
I would not be surprised if Philadelphia wins this game outright.
Eagles defense will be too much, and San Fran has no kicking game.
/infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif
Public been doing okay on the sides on MNF but getting killed with totals.. Just my observation.
Public goes 2-7 on sides at wagerline. they love SF tonight..
http://www.wagerline.com/3/consensus_report.asp?Sport=NFL&Date=11/24/02&Type=ALL&SortBy=PCT
http://www.wagerline.com/3/consensus_report.asp?Sport=NFL&Date=11/24/02&Type=ALL&SortBy=PCT
NO IMO Hockey is the only sport that a square can beat. Hockey without a doubt is the least profitable sport for a book. Players that do their homework, watch the games, and follow trends can find value before the books ajust their numbers. Hockey is also a scalpers paradise with a wide variety of numbers, moneylines, puck lines. Some books with all the other action there taking in may neglect moving their numbers creating more opportunities.
Agree with that.. I've seen some squares do really well in baseball too, hockey is the sport. WNBA lines are always soft, for the crowd that can handle betting/watching it. Seen a guy over the season win some serious cash on the lezbos.
WNBA I agree. If you have a serious WNBA player betting the max he probably knows more then the book he is playing with
Today's NBA
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Anyone else think that this appears to be the easiest spreads of the year? These spreads look to be off by like 10 points on 4-5 games. Will be an easy day today. Good luck everybody"
I agree I saw at least 20 games yesterday where the line was off 10+ points. I thought Philly shoud have been two touchdown favorites
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Anyone else think that this appears to be the easiest spreads of the year? These spreads look to be off by like 10 points on 4-5 games. Will be an easy day today. Good luck everybody"
I agree I saw at least 20 games yesterday where the line was off 10+ points. I thought Philly shoud have been two touchdown favorites
As expected the public loses again. Great weekend for the books.
Altice & DickyW: No surprise the squares were on Philly. I had guys giving me shit about taking Philly until they scored twice, and then they told me SF is playing bad and I got "lucky". Sqaures never understand. They said Detmer was having the game of his life, and they wouldn't go 500 without McNAbb... Then Feely comes in and leads a td drive.. Was quite comical looking at the their faces in disbelief...
Playersonly: Wonder if you are still alive after taking it "easy" by playing the SF moneyline. Reminds me of people saying "Schilling is pitching, Arizona doesn't lose."
Altice & DickyW: No surprise the squares were on Philly. I had guys giving me shit about taking Philly until they scored twice, and then they told me SF is playing bad and I got "lucky". Sqaures never understand. They said Detmer was having the game of his life, and they wouldn't go 500 without McNAbb... Then Feely comes in and leads a td drive.. Was quite comical looking at the their faces in disbelief...
Playersonly: Wonder if you are still alive after taking it "easy" by playing the SF moneyline. Reminds me of people saying "Schilling is pitching, Arizona doesn't lose."
hno:
