I understand this is a tough situation for everyone, but to be totally honest I loved the Sunday Night game. I was very confident in that selection, but it was not posted as an option. I think that it is difficult, but to not have set lines for the MN vs. Wash. game and than be allowed to pick it just in case it is allowed seems unfair when the rest of us were forced to take the TB. vs. SF game. I am not sure how the decision can be reached where it is fair for everyone and I understand the predicament that it puts the mods in, but I checked back frequently in hopes that the mods would post the MN vs. WSH game and I could make a new choice, but that was not the case. It is frustrating, and I know I can't prove it but at this stage to not get a 2-0 and get an 0-2 is tough to deal with when others had an advantage of choosing the Primetime game. I would have abstained from that game all together if that was an option. This is my major point. I think most people would have logged in and saw that the game was TB vs. SF and would have been upset that they did not pick it, and would have thought they had an 0-2. But Mike had the forsight to make a selection even though it was not a posted game, we have allowed him to gain his picks for that night? It just seems like a tough scenario for everyone, I understand this would be a difficult decision but there should be a way where it is fair to everyone, I would have went 2-0 on sunday night, and instead went 0-2 in the other game, I wish I had the option Mike had, that is really really unfair in this particular situation. Thanks again for all your work, not trying to be difficult, just expressing my point of view in hopes that we can make this a fair situation for everyone. Merry Christmas.