Clover...One thing that Pezgordo and I have never been 100% in agreement on is the importance of returning starters. We pretty much agree on everything else when it comes to capping. He doesn't think they are as important as the media and preseason rags would like you to believe. Although I agree with him to an extent, I always have to point out that there is a caveat to this argument. And that is if you are a Blueblood type of program that can redshirt deep talent, then no, the amount of starters isn't as important. As we witnessed last year with FSU's 11 returning starters winning the NC. But my argument is the farther you go down the food chain of elite schools the more you need these returning starters. Basically because most programs don't have that kind of elite talent waiting in the wings. That's why for example from the above teams, the 19 starters returning for Central Michigan is a bigger deal than the 9 starters returning for Baylor. If the roles were reversed for these teams and only 9 were returning for CMU, then they would probably be in for a huge uphill battle and written off as a non-contender for their conference title. But 19 starters returning for Baylor wouldn't be quite as huge of a difference since they already have elite talent two deep at most of their positions. By the way while I'm talking about Baylor, they have the exact same number of starters that Okie State has coming back this year. But the difference between these two teams right now is Baylor has actually out recruited OSU for the last two years, and they are a bit deeper and more experienced team with a star QB leading them. Plus they have a ton of momentum and fan/player excitement going for them after winning the Big 12. So right now if I was playing totals I would be considering the over for Baylor and under for OSU, even though they have the same number of starters coming back.