some trends can be helpful. the 5-0 I think just merely points out he has had success in citifield before, and its really more of just a stat than a trend I think... if he were 0-5 with a 9.00 era at citifield, that would mean something different, and make you think differently. if the 5-0 is meaningless then the 0-5 would be too. it does have some value. it doesn't mean bum will become 6-0 or is due for a loss at 5-1, its just a little info to help paint a picture of possibly what to expect and calculate the risk of plays on each side. though I agree most trends are misinformation and can murky up the picture. For this, if I play the giants, I feel a little more comfortable knowing bum has had no problems pitching at this venue in the past. If I bet the mets I might be a little less confident knowing bums success, but it would not be a firm basis for a play either way
not saying last nights outcome had anything to do with this stat but entering last nights game, e-man had a 5:14 td : int ratio lifetime against the Vikings. For whatever reason that trend continued as he reinforced his reputation for being owned by the purple team with another poor performance. cap tip to minny
uppy: