PENN STATE #3 and five Big Ten teams in top 25......ALLOW ME TO EDUCATE THE COUNTRY

[TimelyHitting]

Well I did attend PSU and am a graduate. I'm not a fan of Illinois State or the MVC. I'm also not a Marquette fan. So I'm from Chicago and I'm a Penn State Alum and that makes me him. Interesting.

Tell us again how you are not themanej? Blatant Chicago sports homerism and probably the only Penn State fan in Illinois, not to mention how you fly off the handle on ridiculous rants when people disagree with you.

Personally I dont care that you are themanej but dont hide behind another new handle. Just post as themanej, you are not banned if I remember correctly


<table class="tborder" id="post4174188" align="center" border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" width="100%"><tbody><tr><td class="thead" style="border-style: solid; border-color: rgb(253, 222, 130); border-width: 1px 0px 1px 1px; font-weight: normal;">

05-31-2007, 07:37 PM <!-- / status icon and date --></td><td class="thead" style="border-style: solid; border-color: rgb(253, 222, 130); border-width: 1px 1px 1px 0px; font-weight: normal;" align="right">#48 </td></tr><tr valign="top"><td class="alt2" style="border-style: solid; border-color: rgb(253, 222, 130); border-width: 0px 1px;" width="175">
</td><td class="alt1" id="td_post_4174188" style="border-right: 1px solid rgb(253, 222, 130);">
</td></tr><tr><td class="alt2" style="border-style: solid; border-color: rgb(253, 222, 130); border-width: 0px 1px 1px;">
</td><td class="alt1" style="border-style: solid; border-color: rgb(253, 222, 130); border-width: 0px 1px 1px 0px;" align="right">
</td></tr></tbody></table>

 

[ToddInVegas]

Well I did attend PSU and am a graduate. I'm not a fan of Illinois State or the MVC. I'm also not a Marquette fan. So I'm from Chicago and I'm a Penn State Alum and that makes me him. Interesting.

Not exactly a denial. Like I said, doesnt matter to me that you are themanej, just post under the original handle. Based on your posting style and content both here and at EOG it is very clear that you are themanej. No big deal. Carry on

 

[TimelyHitting]

Not exactly a denial. Like I said, doesnt matter to me that you are themanej, just post under the original handle. Based on your posting style and content both here and at EOG it is very clear that you are themanej. No big deal. Carry on

It is a denial. I'm not him. You have your opinion but it's wrong. This will all be settled when I meet up with a couple of the guys from the sites. I take your accusation personally because he was one uneducated human being. His writing style was horrific. For you to say I have a similar posting style gets to me a little bit. Carry on.

 

[REDEYE]

The way this horrible system is set up no one has a problem with that matchup. It will be just another bad championship game though.

If we could just have a 4 BCS game quarterfinal playoff with 4 existing bowl games, most of the time we could have great championship games. Teams that don't belong " Ohio St & Penn St " would be exposed most of the time in that quarterfinal game. They would have to play more talented teams to move on. Thats why March Madness is a better post season sport , they expose undeserving teams unlike the phony college postseason exhibition games. And yes the regular season would still matter just as much or more since 1 loss would not end the season for some teams. Even now you can win every game and not play for a championship, so instead you tell Auburn to go play in a meaningless game because your not voted into the championship

 

[ToddInVegas]

It is a denial. I'm not him. You have your opinion but it's wrong. This will all be settled when I meet up with a couple of the guys from the sites. I take your accusation personally because he was one uneducated human being. His writing style was horrific. For you to say I have a similar posting style gets to me a little bit. Carry on.[/quote]


Thats odd, you just registered in August 2008 and he has been "gone" for over a year. When you registered did you take the time to review his posts for some particular reason?


Let me guess, you were a lurker for a long time and finally decided to start posting in August. hno:

 

[TimelyHitting]

It is a denial. I'm not him. You have your opinion but it's wrong. This will all be settled when I meet up with a couple of the guys from the sites. I take your accusation personally because he was one uneducated human being. His writing style was horrific. For you to say I have a similar posting style gets to me a little bit. Carry on.[/quote]


Thats odd, you just registered in August 2008 and he has been "gone" for over a year. When you registered did you take the time to review his posts for some particular reason?


Let me guess, you were a lurker for a long time and finally decided to start posting in August. hno:

Wasn't a lurker at all. People have bumped countless threads saying I was him so I read some of his postings. Does that make sense? For someone who doesn't care you sure are going out of your way to try and look right; but you can't be right since I'm not him.

 

[PokerKingJim]

Penn St. #24?

If you believe that... you have lost your brain.

And

Ohio St. #24?

If you believe that... you have lost your brain.

 

[Fishhead]

And

Ohio St. #24?

If you believe that... you have lost your brain.

I stated 24th through 65th. :nono5:

Ohio St--destroyed by USC by 30+ pts.

Ohio St--defeated the last place team in the big ten by 3 pts.

Ohio St--scored 6 pts against PSU

Ohio St--cupcake non-conference wins


Ok, let's rank them 29th.

 

[ChiTownHustler]

As we read the constant blasting on this and other forums against the B10, the bowl lines will have this public preception bias in mind and milk it for what it's worth. I see heavily slanted lines against the B10 come the Capital One/ Outback & Alamo bowls.
Books are gonna juice this for what its worth, they'll get away with making people lay numbers that will be askew form where they should be in the bowls mentioned above, knowing the desire to bet against the B10.
Just last week I saw 2 games that the SEC played out of conf. against comperable foes where I thought the line was skewed to SEC bias (Duke/ Vandy & Auburn/ WV).

Not sayin the Big10 doesnt deserved to be bashed because they are pretty shitty this year OOC. But they do have a 10-9 record since 2002 against the SEC in bowls and what I read year in and out on this board you'd think the B10 would be winning at a 25% clip.

I think the VALUE will be in the PAC 10 and B10 teams come bowl season.

Just food for thought.

 

[Fishhead]

Get off the shitter, I tell it like it is Lucky Joe........

Having said that, how will the worst IOWA team in six years fare against the "almighty great" PSU team this week?

They will probably give them all they can handle........LMFAO!

:missingte:missingte

Actually, IOWA gave PSU more than they could handle.