I just figured out that by betting every big dog of +200 or more for the whole year at action, you would end up losing.. Here is the breakdown..
Lets say that out of the 2,430 MLB games each year, there will be 150 games that will have a +200 dog or better, correct? And i estimated that approx 1 in 25 games, the pitcher will be a late scratch. So that means you will end up with about 6 bets of a +200, where the line will end up approx +150 lets say. So only 6 games a year you will get 50 cents or better advantage, and 144 games you will end up with the right price..
144 times the house will have a hold of 2.5% (10 cent line)
6 times you will have a hold advantage of about 23% (approx)
_________
If each of your 150 bets were for 100, you would lose 360 dollars.. (144 x 100 x .025)
And your 6 bets would be at a +23% advantage.
100 x 6 x .023, for a profit of only 13 small bucks..
________
So Patty, yes it sounds like a good idea at first, but if you do play every dog at action at the current price, you will win 13 bucks and lose 360, for a negative result of -347, over a full season at a bet of 100 a game, over a full season..