I don't understand all of the hate towards New England.
They lost Tom Brady -- the greatest quarterback of all time. Did people think they were going to still be this incredible dynasty? Especially when you have these competitive teams with excellent QB's in the conference.
They've been a plucky team ever since Brady left despite having below average offensive talent. Some of the lack of talent is obviously on Belichick, but honestly I don't think he's ever been the greatest talent evaluator on that side of the ball.
They've still had some good defenses and haven't seemed to miss much of a beat there.
I don't really get why people thought they'd be some bottom feeder this year. I guess the season is young, but there's a lot to like about them in a division where all the teams are pretty flawed (though none of them suck).
That first game showed some reason for optimism, even if it's just a Week 1 game. They really flustered a potent offense and quarterback, and probably should have won the game -- were the better team overall I'd say.
I mean yeah those people were just biased/wrong thenObviously people thought they were going to still be perennial contenders when Brady and Phillip Dorset left. That was made clear by several people on this board. Brady was just another in the long line that time had passed and the machine would roll on.
I dunno what plucky means, but 25-27 is mediocre by any nfl standards, but especially so if you’re considered the best coach ever. Then it’s awful.
People thought that Cassell/Garapollo shit was real and not small sample based, is what it is.
but I think they can be OK this year too, doesn’t take much to compete once teams start dying off left and right. And NE doesn’t even have much talent anyway so injuries don’t hurt them as much as others.
Sure that’s fineIf you think they saddled themselves with a low ceiling quarterback and not much offensive talent then that’s you hating on their management in a round about way
There is almost nothing worse you can do in the nfl than saddle yourself with a low ceiling quarterback and minimal offensive talent.
That’s not what you wanna do, makes sense people would critique it.
Sure that’s fine
But I don’t think they could have done significantly better in terms of accruing talent. It just kinda is what it is
Easier said than donehuh? Of course they could’ve, they had 3 years. You just draft better. Make a trade that takes some risk like so many other teams have.
The nfl doesn’t say “hey Patriots, you had Brady for 19 so we’re gonna make you take Mac Jones as your QB and Kendrick Bourne is gonna be your #1 WR for the foreseeable future, OK?”
this isn’t the nba where talent is so scarce and 10 players run the league, you just manage the team better like some other teams have.