This is where you start ti get yourself in trouble stevie... lol ?????????
Actually, it is a FACT that the election was not stolen. It has been litigated and even brought in front of a Supreme Court with THREE Trump-appointed judges.
SCOTUS voted 9-0 to dismiss
U.S. Supreme Court formally pulls the plug on election-related cases
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday brought a formal end to eight lingering disputes pursued by former President Donald Trump and his allies related to the Nov. 3 presidential election including a Republican challenge to the extension of Pennsylvania's deadline to receive mail-in...
www.reuters.com
??????. Geeez ur a ……………Actually, it is a FACT that the election was not stolen. It has been litigated and even brought in front of a Supreme Court with THREE Trump-appointed judges.
SCOTUS voted 9-0 to dismiss
U.S. Supreme Court formally pulls the plug on election-related cases
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday brought a formal end to eight lingering disputes pursued by former President Donald Trump and his allies related to the Nov. 3 presidential election including a Republican challenge to the extension of Pennsylvania's deadline to receive mail-in...
Someone wanna tell DaDonger
Then same judges he appointed that rule in his favor all the time wanted nothing to do with itWhy didn't any of Trump's lawyers present evidence of election tampering in any of their court cases?
Even Bill Barr said there was no evidence of election fraud
Except dismissal by the court does not mean what you claim it does. The court NEVER said that there was no election fraud.Actually, it is a FACT that the election was not stolen. It has been litigated and even brought in front of a Supreme Court with THREE Trump-appointed judges.
SCOTUS voted 9-0 to dismiss
U.S. Supreme Court formally pulls the plug on election-related cases
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday brought a formal end to eight lingering disputes pursued by former President Donald Trump and his allies related to the Nov. 3 presidential election including a Republican challenge to the extension of Pennsylvania's deadline to receive mail-in...
They dismissed the cases. Why? Because the Trump appointees are strict Constitutionalists. Elections are given to the states to run as they please. The Trump appointed judges want the state legislatures to do their jobs. Simple. Same principle as Roe vs Wade. It's a states issue. Get it?
Quit implying that Trump appointed judges rejected any claims of election fraud. It's not true. They did not.
?
The stolen election will be litigated in the fall (Moore v. Harper), and all the conspiracy theorists who foolishly, blindly believed in the myth of 81 million votes without any documented, verified proof whatsoever, other than the assurance of corrupted election officials, will simply have to suck on it.
The WI Supreme Court already ruled the 2020 election "illegal" and "illegitimate" - a sneak preview of what's to come, as individual states and legislatures take back their constitutional authority.
Accordingly, soon the criminals who overthrew a duly elected govt with the assistance of a foreign power will be forced to give back the stolen jewels.
The wheels of justice grind slowly, but justice IS coming.
The recent "last gasp" actions by a scrambling corrupted DOJ-FBI and #PedoHitler's desperate deplorable (pun intended) speech tells you all you need to know - THEY know what's coming.
"Law and Order"
The WI Supreme Court already ruled the 2020 election "illegal" and "illegitimate" - a sneak preview of what's to come, as individual states and legislatures take back their constitutional authority.
Accordingly, soon the criminals who overthrew a duly elected govt with the assistance of a foreign power will be forced to give back the stolen jewels.
The wheels of justice grind slowly, but justice IS coming.
The recent "last gasp" actions by a scrambling corrupted DOJ-FBI and #PedoHitler's desperate deplorable (pun intended) speech tells you all you need to know - THEY know what's coming.
"Law and Order"
88 clinical trials says it does. They cherry pick the data....just like the whole natural immunity scam. They said for over a year there was no such thing. Lo and behold, it is a thing, and proven to be the best thing. 70M + ppl had covid even before the vaxxez were available. Dont be such a sucker for the "false or misleadin information." Fauci said the same about Bactrim in the 80s with HIV. Know what they use widespread for pneumonia from HIV?? Yep, Bactrim. All the meanwhile he was working on a $6-12,000 series of meds by big pharma.
Ivermectin doesn't speed recovery from mild COVID-19, study shows
www.cidrap.umn.edu
Its amazing the flip flop that has taken place with the left/right with regards to big pharma.
