Ooooo..what possibly could Maricopa county be hiding? Maricopa County Board Votes Against Complying With Subpoenas to Audit Voting Machines

[MAGAking1]

This is so stupid, you would think BOZO wrote it.....these guys are just pulling shit out of thier asses

 

[GasMan]

Laughable ^^^

 

[Bozzie]

Gezzz two Qmosexuals
Don't make me your new guru lost boys.....

This is so stupid, you would think BOZO wrote it.....these guys are just pulling shit out of thier asses

 

[Bozzie]

congressional oversight committee gives Douglas Logan till July 28th to produce the following documents.



https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/2021-07-14.CBM%20JR%20to%20Logan-Cyber%20Ninjas%20re%20Arizona%20Election%20Audit.pdf



Committee’s Requests
The Constitution guarantees the right to vote and empowers Congress to legislate to protect that right and regulate elections.29 Congress has enacted legislation to safeguard this right and to ensure that elections are safe, secure, and fairly and impartially administered.30 Congress is also empowered to investigate any conduct that may infringe on this fundamental right,31 and the Committee has examined state voting and elections issues on numerous occasions.32
The Committee is deeply troubled by Cyber Ninjas’ lack of election audit experience; its reported mismanagement of the audit in Maricopa County, which may have compromised ballots and election equipment; your own bias and history of embracing conspiracy theories related to the election; and the private sources of funding that may have further undermined the credibility and impartiality of this effort. The Committee is particularly concerned that your company’s actions could undermine the integrity of federal elections and interfere with Americans’ constitutional right to cast their ballot freely and to have their votes counted without partisan interference. In connection with this investigation, the Committee intends to study the need for legislative reforms to ensure the right is protected before, during, and after an election and that third parties do not interfere with this right.
28 Michigan Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Seeking New Audit of Antrim County Vote, One of the Last Remaining 2020 Legal Challenges, Washington Post (May 18, 2021) (online at www.washingtonpost.com/politics/antrim-county-lawsuit/2021/05/18/e324451a-b802-11eb-a5fe- bb49dc89a248_story.html); Arizona Ballot Audit Backed by Secretive Donors Linked to Trump’s Inner Circle, The Guardian (June 9, 2021) (online at www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jun/09/arizona-election-audit-trump-2020- review).
29 U.S. Const., amend. XV (“The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.”); U.S. Const., art. I, sec. 4 (“The times, places and manner of holding elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each state by the legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by law make or alter such regulations.”).
30 See, e.g., Help America Vote Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-252; National Voter Registration Act of 1993, Pub. L. No. 103-31; Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act, Pub. L. No. 99-410 (1986).
31 See, e.g., Eastland v. United States Servicemen’s Fund, 421 U.S. 491 (1975) (holding that Congress’s power to investigate “is as penetrating and far-reaching as the potential power to enact and appropriate under the Constitution”).
32 See, e.g., Committee on Oversight and Reform, Hearing on Voter Suppression in Minority Communities: Learning from the Past to Protect Our Future, 116th Cong. (Feb. 26, 2020) (examining the results of the Committee’s investigation of voter suppression allegations in Georgia, Texas, and Kansas); Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Hearing on Cyber-securing the Vote: Ensuring the Integrity of the U.S. Election Systems, 115th Cong. (July 24, 2018); Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Subcommittee on Information Technology and Subcommittee on Intergovernmental Affairs, Joint Hearing on Cybersecurity of Voting Machines, 115th Cong. (Nov. 29, 2017).

Mr. Douglas Logan Page 7
For all of these reasons, the Committee requests that Cyber Ninjas produce the following documents by July 28:

1. Documents sufficient to show all individuals and entities with direct or indirect ownership interests in, or control of, Cyber Ninjas, including, but not limited to, officers, board members, and shareholders;
   
2. Documents sufficient to show all previous clients to which Cyber Ninjas has provided consulting services related to election audits or election law and a detailed description of the services provided, the payments received, and the source of the funds;
   
3. All documents and communications related to the engagement of Cyber Ninjas for the Maricopa County audit, including but not limited to the purpose of the engagement, the scope of work, the role of the company, and the role of other individuals or entities;
   
4. All documents and communications related to payment or funding for the Maricopa County audit, including but not limited to the sources, amounts, terms, and conditions of such funding and any fundraising efforts;
   
5. All documents and communications related to conducting the Maricopa County audit, including but not limited to policies, procedures, audit plans, strategy, staffing and personnel, and security or integrity problems that arose during the audit, and any interim or final audit findings;
   
6. All documents and communications related to the following allegations that have reportedly been considered by you or your company in connection with the 2020 presidential election:
   
   1. bamboo-laced ballots smuggled in from Asian countries;33
      
   2. watermarks placed on the ballot by the Trump campaign that were visible with UV lights;34
      
   3. machine-marked ballots;35

33 See Arizona Republicans Hunt for Bamboo-Laced China Ballots in 2020 “Audit” Effort, The Guardian (May 6, 2021) (online at www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/may/06/arizona-republicans-bamboo-ballots-audit- 2020).
34 See Cyber Ninjas, UV Lights and Far-Right Funding: Inside the Strange Arizona 2020 Election “Audit”, The Guardian (May 14, 2021) (online at www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/may/14/arizona-election- audit-recount-ballots-maricopa-county).
35 See I Watched the GOP’s Arizona Election Audit. It Was Worse than You Think, Washington Post (May 19, 2021) (online at www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2021/05/19/gop-arizona-election-audit/).

Mr. Douglas Logan Page 8

1. errors designed to create fraud in Dominion Voting Systems’ equipment;36 and
   
2. the involvement of current or former members of the Central Intelligence Agency in disinformation around election fraud;37

1. All documents and communications related to formal or informal complaints related to the audit received by Cyber Ninjas from any source, including but not limited to federal, state, or county election officials, Cyber Ninjas employees, or other individuals;
   
2. All instructions, directions, training materials, and guidance Cyber Ninjas employees, consultants, agents, volunteers, or representatives received relating to the Maricopa County audit; and
   
3. For the period between November 6, 2020, and the present, all communications involving you or any Cyber Ninjas employees, consultants, agents, volunteers, or representatives with:
   
   1. former President Donald Trump;
      
   2. any Trump Administration official;
      
   3. any formal or informal representative of President Trump’s presidential campaign, legal team, or political action committee;
      
   4. any representative of Voices and Votes, Fight Back, America Project, or any other funder of the Maricopa County audit;
      
   5. Rudy Giuliani or any of his agents or representatives;
      
   6. Sidney Powell;
      
   7. L. Lin Wood;
      
   8. Patrick Byrne;

36 See Founder of Company Hired to Conduct Maricopa County Election Audit Promoted Election Fraud Theories, Arizona Republic (Mar. 31, 2021) (online at www.azcentral.com/story/news/politi...er-ninjas-founder-doug-logan-pushed-election- fraud-theories/4825258001/).
37 See Audit Leader Doug Logan Appears in Conspiracy Theorist Election Film, Arizona Mirror (June 26, 2021) (online at www.azmirror.com/2021/06/26/audit-leader-doug-logan-appears-in-conspiracy-theorist-election- film/).

Mr. Douglas Logan Page 9

1. Michael Flynn; or
   
2. Michael Lindell.

The Committee on Oversight and Reform is the principal oversight committee of the House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
An attachment to this letter provides additional instructions for responding to this request. If you have any questions regarding this request, please contact Committee staff at (202) 225- 5051.


Sincerely,

__________________________ Carolyn B. Maloney
Chairwoman
Committee on Oversight and Reform
Enclosure

__________________________ Jamie Raskin
Chairman
Subcommittee on Civil Rights and Civil Liberties


cc: The Honorable James Comer, Ranking Member Committee on Oversight and Reform
The Honorable Pete Sessions, Ranking Member Subcommittee on Civil Rights and Civil Liberties





Responding to Oversight Committee Document Requests

1. In complying with this request, produce all responsive documents that are in your possession, custody, or control, whether held by you or your past or present agents, employees, and representatives acting on your behalf. Produce all documents that you have a legal right to obtain, that you have a right to copy, or to which you have access, as well as documents that you have placed in the temporary possession, custody, or control of any third party.
2. Requested documents, and all documents reasonably related to the requested documents, should not be destroyed, altered, removed, transferred, or otherwise made inaccessible to the Committee.
3. In the event that any entity, organization, or individual denoted in this request is or has been known by any name other than that herein denoted, the request shall be read also to include that alternative identification.
4. The Committee’s preference is to receive documents in electronic form (i.e., CD, memory stick, thumb drive, or secure file transfer) in lieu of paper productions.
5. Documents produced in electronic format should be organized, identified, and indexed electronically.
6. Electronic document productions should be prepared according to the following standards:
   1. The production should consist of single page Tagged Image File (“TIF”), files accompanied by a Concordance-format load file, an Opticon reference file, and a file defining the fields and character lengths of the load file.
   2. Document numbers in the load file should match document Bates numbers and TIF file names.
   3. If the production is completed through a series of multiple partial productions, field names and file order in all load files should match.
   4. All electronic documents produced to the Committee should include the following fields of metadata specific to each document, and no modifications should be made to the original metadata:
      BEGDOC, ENDDOC, TEXT, BEGATTACH, ENDATTACH, PAGECOUNT, CUSTODIAN, RECORDTYPE, DATE, TIME, SENTDATE, SENTTIME, BEGINDATE, BEGINTIME, ENDDATE, ENDTIME, AUTHOR, FROM, CC, TO, BCC, SUBJECT, TITLE, FILENAME, FILEEXT, FILESIZE, DATECREATED, TIMECREATED, DATELASTMOD, TIMELASTMOD,

INTMSGID, INTMSGHEADER, NATIVELINK, INTFILPATH, EXCEPTION, BEGATTACH.

1. Documents produced to the Committee should include an index describing the contents of the production. To the extent more than one CD, hard drive, memory stick, thumb drive, zip file, box, or folder is produced, each should contain an index describing its contents.
2. Documents produced in response to this request shall be produced together with copies of file labels, dividers, or identifying markers with which they were associated when the request was served.
3. When you produce documents, you should identify the paragraph(s) or request(s) in the Committee’s letter to which the documents respond.
4. The fact that any other person or entity also possesses non-identical or identical copies of the same documents shall not be a basis to withhold any information.
5. The pendency of or potential for litigation shall not be a basis to withhold any information.
6. In accordance with 5 U.S.C.§ 552(d), the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and any statutory exemptions to FOIA shall not be a basis for withholding any information.
7. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b)(9), the Privacy Act shall not be a basis for withholding information.
8. If compliance with the request cannot be made in full by the specified return date, compliance shall be made to the extent possible by that date. An explanation of why full compliance is not possible shall be provided along with any partial production.
9. In the event that a document is withheld on the basis of privilege, provide a privilege log containing the following information concerning any such document: (a) every privilege asserted; (b) the type of document; (c) the general subject matter; (d) the date, author, addressee, and any other recipient(s); (e) the relationship of the author and addressee to each other; and (f) the basis for the privilege(s) asserted.
10. If any document responsive to this request was, but no longer is, in your possession, custody, or control, identify the document (by date, author, subject, and recipients), and explain the circumstances under which the document ceased to be in your possession, custody, or control.
11. If a date or other descriptive detail set forth in this request referring to a document is inaccurate, but the actual date or other descriptive detail is known to you or is otherwise apparent from the context of the request, produce all documents that would be responsive as if the date or other descriptive detail were correct.

2

1. This request is continuing in nature and applies to any newly-discovered information. Any record, document, compilation of data, or information not produced because it has not been located or discovered by the return date shall be produced immediately upon subsequent location or discovery.
2. All documents shall be Bates-stamped sequentially and produced sequentially.
3. Two sets of each production shall be delivered, one set to the Majority Staff and one set to the Minority Staff. When documents are produced to the Committee, production sets shall be delivered to the Majority Staff in Room 2157 of the Rayburn House Office Building and the Minority Staff in Room 2105 of the Rayburn House Office Building.
4. Upon completion of the production, submit a written certification, signed by you or your counsel, stating that: (1) a diligent search has been completed of all documents in your possession, custody, or control that reasonably could contain responsive documents; and (2) all documents located during the search that are responsive have been produced to the Committee.
   Definitions

1. The term “document” means any written, recorded, or graphic matter of any nature whatsoever, regardless of how recorded, and whether original or copy, including, but not limited to, the following: memoranda, reports, expense reports, books, manuals, instructions, financial reports, data, working papers, records, notes, letters, notices, confirmations, telegrams, receipts, appraisals, pamphlets, magazines, newspapers, prospectuses, communications, electronic mail (email), contracts, cables, notations of any type of conversation, telephone call, meeting or other inter-office or intra-office communication, bulletins, printed matter, computer printouts, teletypes, invoices, transcripts, diaries, analyses, returns, summaries, minutes, bills, accounts, estimates, projections, comparisons, messages, correspondence, press releases, circulars, financial statements, reviews, opinions, offers, studies and investigations, questionnaires and surveys, and work sheets (and all drafts, preliminary versions, alterations, modifications, revisions, changes, and amendments of any of the foregoing, as well as any attachments or appendices thereto), and graphic or oral records or representations of any kind (including without limitation, photographs, charts, graphs, microfiche, microfilm, videotape, recordings and motion pictures), and electronic, mechanical, and electric records or representations of any kind (including, without limitation, tapes, cassettes, disks, and recordings) and other written, printed, typed, or other graphic or recorded matter of any kind or nature, however produced or reproduced, and whether preserved in writing, film, tape, disk, videotape, or otherwise. A document bearing any notation not a part of the original text is to be considered a separate document. A draft or non-identical copy is a separate document within the meaning of this term.
2. The term “communication” means each manner or means of disclosure or exchange of information, regardless of means utilized, whether oral, electronic, by document or otherwise, and whether in a meeting, by telephone, facsimile, mail, releases, electronic

3



message including email (desktop or mobile device), text message, instant message, MMS or SMS message, message application, or otherwise.

1. The terms “and” and “or” shall be construed broadly and either conjunctively or disjunctively to bring within the scope of this request any information that might otherwise be construed to be outside its scope. The singular includes plural number, and vice versa. The masculine includes the feminine and neutral genders.
2. The term “including” shall be construed broadly to mean “including, but not limited to.”
3. The term “Company” means the named legal entity as well as any units, firms, partnerships, associations, corporations, limited liability companies, trusts, subsidiaries, affiliates, divisions, departments, branches, joint ventures, proprietorships, syndicates, or other legal, business or government entities over which the named legal entity exercises control or in which the named entity has any ownership whatsoever.
4. The term “identify,” when used in a question about individuals, means to provide the following information: (a) the individual’s complete name and title; (b) the individual’s business or personal address and phone number; and (c) any and all known aliases.
5. The term “related to” or “referring or relating to,” with respect to any given subject, means anything that constitutes, contains, embodies, reflects, identifies, states, refers to, deals with, or is pertinent to that subject in any manner whatsoever.
6. The term “employee” means any past or present agent, borrowed employee, casual employee, consultant, contractor, de facto employee, detailee, fellow, independent contractor, intern, joint adventurer, loaned employee, officer, part-time employee, permanent employee, provisional employee, special government employee, subcontractor, or any other type of service provider.
7. The term “individual” means all natural persons and all persons or entities acting on their behalf.

 

[LENBO]

AZ Senate President @FannKfann announces a public election audit hearing . Today at 10:00am MST.

The Senate President will be asking what has been completed and what is needed to finish the audit so that we can receive the complete final report.

 

[Serbone]

Arizona Senate to Hold Hearing Thursday Morning at 10 AM on Arizona Election Audit


SO, many of you claim there is proof of significant voter fraud forthcoming, what do you think will happen at this public hearing?

 

[GasMan]

How you know the rats are getting nervous?


Congressional Democrats Launch Probe Into Arizona 2020 Election Audit

 

[GasMan]

Arizona Senate to Hold Hearing Thursday Morning at 10 AM on Arizona Election Audit


SO, many of you claim there is proof of significant voter fraud forthcoming, what do you think will happen at this public hearing?

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...aricopa-county-audit-results-10-phoenix-time/

 

[roadreeler57]

Watch Live: Az Senate Hearing on The Election Audit in ...[FONT=DDG_ProximaNova] https://rsbnetwork.com/video/watch-live-az-senate-hearing-on-the-election-audit-in-maricopa-county/
[/FONT]
[FONT=DDG_ProximaNova]WATCH LIVE: AZ SENATE HEARING ON THE ELECTION AUDIT IN MARICOPA COUNTY July 15, 2021. Federal Court Rules Ban On Firearm Sales to 18 to 20 Year Olds is Unconstitutional July 15, 2021 "History will remember": President Trump Backs Cubans in Fight for Freedom July 15, 2021. 13-Minute News Hour with Bobby Eberle - Batman vs. Superman - The ...[/FONT]

 

[GasMan]

The most secure audit EVER conducted. Dem shit bags still trying to say it was not legit and or corrupted.

Dems, Repubs, Independents, Libertarians....all heavily vetted with background checks, social media checks and more to make sure NONE of the officials were compromised.

ID badges necessary at all time at multiple checkpoints at entrance, exit, and at individual tables.

Video footage on EVERYTHING and every process of ballot handling.

Chain of custody paperwork ad nauseum.

 

[GasMan]

Arizona Senate Audit Team CAUGHT THEM! Ballots were on WRONG PAPER STOCK — Confirms the SHARPIEGATE SCANDAL

 

[SmallDaddy]

.



<<-------

 

[GasMan]

.



<<-------

Insert Trump avatar here

 

[GasMan]

AZ Audit Team: “There Was a Breach of Computer Systems During the 2020 Election – High Vulnerability for Internet Computer Hack

 

[GasMan]

AZ Audit Finds 74,000 Ballots Returned and Counted in 2020 Election with NO RECORD of Being Sent Out


Well.....thats a little pecuilar

 

[SheriffJoe]

Insert Trump avatar here

There are seriously dumb posters on this forum who genuinely believe Biden won.

SmallDaddy isn't one of them.

 

[MAGAking1]

NOTHING CAN STOP WHAT IS COMING

Here is a current summary(not my words)

Arizona audit hearing notes, updating as I review.

• 74,243 mail-in ballots found where there is NO clear record of them ever being sent.
• 11,326 names were added to the voting rolls AFTER election day, but are recorded as casting a ballot in the 2020 election.
• More than 30,000 individuals registrations show them voting after State deadline.
• Digital forensic expert Ben Cotton reveals the Maricopa County election system was BREACHED during the course of the 2020 election. Anti-virus systems not up to date since August of 2019. Allows access to server & systems.
• On March 11, over 37,000 queries for a blank password on a Maricopa system that only contained 8 accounts. This was script used by the EMS Admin account. Who was using the EMS admin account? We don’t know because Maricopa County won’t hand over the routers which were ordered in the subpoena.
• Maricopa did not put serial numbers on original and duplicated ballots and so cannot ensure they were accurately duplicated or how many times they were duplicated.
• hearing outlined WHAT they need from the Election Board, WHY they need it to complete the audit, and what excuse they've been given as to why they haven't been turned over.

AZ State Senator Wendy Rogers: "I have heard enough. With the tens of thousands of ballots mailed without being requested, the over ten thousand people who voted after registering after November 3rd, the failure of Maricopa to turn over the 40% machines, the passwords that Dominion still refuses to turn over, & tens of thousands of unauthorized queries demonstrating how insecure the election was, I call for the Biden electors to be recalled to Arizona & a new election must be conducted. Arizona’s electors must not be awarded fraudulently & we need to get this right."

 

[SheriffJoe]

It's official:

TRUMP WON ARIZONA!

People are going to demand audits now all across the country!!

 

[MAGAking1]

 

[GasMan]

Oops!