I have always been in the complete minority on this whole need for a TRUE national Champion in College Football. At the end of the day is your life any different knowing there is a so called true NAtional Championship from a Playoff system? Can youeven name in order the last 5 NCAA basketball champions in 30 seconds? Didnt think so) What was wrong with the old system with Bowl games (7 or more on NEW YEARS Day!!!). Good traditions in bowl games (Im so glad the Rose bowl is back with Big 10 and PAc 10) and then the UPI and AP voting for fun at the end while everybody has an opinion.
Just becasue most sports have a playoff college football can and did exist for decades with no "True National Champion" and even if the BCS title game is between #2 and #3 from the polls is it really going to change your outlook on life??
Relax all the games will have point spreads and many will offer good TV and good story lines and good value.
Just becasue most sports have a playoff college football can and did exist for decades with no "True National Champion" and even if the BCS title game is between #2 and #3 from the polls is it really going to change your outlook on life??
Relax all the games will have point spreads and many will offer good TV and good story lines and good value.
Not necessarily VVV, if USC is impressive they should get a Co-Title with the Sugar winner, but if they barely win then they shouldn't as Michigan is stout and explosive yet their W-L column would still leave that win a far 2nd to either an OU with a 2-0 top ten record or an LSU with an 5-1 top 20 mark.
USC winning over Michigan would be their first versus a current top 20 team, and only their 2nd for the year(WSU was in top 20 of their loss to USC).
Michigan and Navarre can certainly do what OSU's 20 Int QB did Saturday(485 YP, including 3 bad calls that cost them another 85 yds).
But agree USC was hosed, and they are as good as anyone on most any Saturday, however USC's O and their D are quite polar opposites..they just haven't been challenged properly enough this fall for the Sugar call.
USC winning over Michigan would be their first versus a current top 20 team, and only their 2nd for the year(WSU was in top 20 of their loss to USC).
Michigan and Navarre can certainly do what OSU's 20 Int QB did Saturday(485 YP, including 3 bad calls that cost them another 85 yds).
But agree USC was hosed, and they are as good as anyone on most any Saturday, however USC's O and their D are quite polar opposites..they just haven't been challenged properly enough this fall for the Sugar call.
