You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Offshore books have gotten way too difficult!!!
- Thread starter razorbackpicks
- Start date
when one talks about offshore, it really is two separate markets.
the first is the post up market which is smaller and inhabited mainly
by squares. the second is the credit market which is much larger
and has a much higher % of sharps. the post up market is tougher
to move money around without incurring hassles or fees. this is
due to banking and licensing regulations both domestic and foreign.
good, cheap, and effective money moving methods are hard to find.
I know of one major credit shoppe that got rid of post up many years
ago when funding/paying was much easier due to the fact that the
post up players (who are much smaller bettors than credit players)
required too much time, effort, and tended to complain more. he said
it just wasn't worth the effort or aggravation when the real money was
in the credit side. when I refer to the credit side i'm not referring to PPH
as they are basically bookies with a cyberspace office. hope this helps.
the first is the post up market which is smaller and inhabited mainly
by squares. the second is the credit market which is much larger
and has a much higher % of sharps. the post up market is tougher
to move money around without incurring hassles or fees. this is
due to banking and licensing regulations both domestic and foreign.
good, cheap, and effective money moving methods are hard to find.
I know of one major credit shoppe that got rid of post up many years
ago when funding/paying was much easier due to the fact that the
post up players (who are much smaller bettors than credit players)
required too much time, effort, and tended to complain more. he said
it just wasn't worth the effort or aggravation when the real money was
in the credit side. when I refer to the credit side i'm not referring to PPH
as they are basically bookies with a cyberspace office. hope this helps.
when one talks about offshore, it really is two separate markets.
the first is the post up market which is smaller and inhabited mainly
by squares. the second is the credit market which is much larger
and has a much higher % of sharps. the post up market is tougher
to move money around without incurring hassles or fees. this is
due to banking and licensing regulations both domestic and foreign.
good, cheap, and effective money moving methods are hard to find.
I know of one major credit shoppe that got rid of post up many years
ago when funding/paying was much easier due to the fact that the
post up players (who are much smaller bettors than credit players)
required too much time, effort, and tended to complain more. he said
it just wasn't worth the effort or aggravation when the real money was
in the credit side. when I refer to the credit side i'm not referring to PPH
as they are basically bookies with a cyberspace office. hope this helps.
Yep, 100% certain now you do not live around US minorities and thus are clueless. Nothing wrong with the above comment, though.
Bookmaker is easy to fund with crypto. So is Nitrogen.
Nitrogen offers -105 on NFL (atleast thats what I see for week 1, not sure if that is every week, didn't use it before this year)
But be aware that you are taking the risk that BTC could go down so if you think BTC is just worthless or don't feel like investing in it, then this probably isn't the avenue for you.
Nitrogen offers -105 on NFL (atleast thats what I see for week 1, not sure if that is every week, didn't use it before this year)
But be aware that you are taking the risk that BTC could go down so if you think BTC is just worthless or don't feel like investing in it, then this probably isn't the avenue for you.
