Obama Claimed Iran's Nuclear Program was "frozen" Shock: Obama Lied

[superbeets]

Hillary Clinton emerges as biggest cheerleader for Obama's Iran nuke deal

It took most of the day, but Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton finally delivered on Tuesday night a carefully written defense of President Barack Obama's landmark nuclear deal with Iran.
Republicans say her statement, sent to reporters well after 9:00 p.m., includes enough loopholes and soft language to give her political deniability if Tehran should violate the terms of the agreement before next year's election.

 

[superbeets]

[h=1]'The fuse is lit for a nuclear arms race in the Middle East': Critics warn Arab rivals will not 'sit idly by' after Iran's atomic accord –as Russia strikes three power plant deals with Egypt, Jordan and Saudi Arabia[/h]

• Arab nations doubt that accord will prevent Tehran obtaining atomic bomb
• Saudis fear lifting of sanctions will allow Iran to 'cause turmoil' in region
• Syrian rebels warn that the agreement 'translates into more barrel bombs, more massacres and more blood across Syria'

PUBLISHED: 11:29, 15 July 2015 | UPDATED: 12:42, 15 July 2015

The landmark atomic deal agreed with Iran has 'lit the fuse' for a nuclear arms race in the Middle East, critics have warned.
Yesterday's announcement was met with a profound wariness in the Arab world, where there are fears of Tehran gaining a nuclear weapon and deep skepticism that the accord will prevent that from happening.
Critics of the U.S-led negotiations warned that the other nations in the Middle East will 'not sit idly by' while Iran develops its nuclear capabilities.
They also point out that it has now opened the door for Russia to exert more influence in the region after it struck three major nuclear deals in the Middle East in the last six months.

 

[superbeets]

'Iran has been given a license to kill': Republicans join Netanyahu in blasting 'historic mistake' of agreeing to Tehran nuclear deal

• Presidential hopefuls in the GOP lined up to condemn the bargain
• Obama threatens to veto any act of Congress that prevents him from implementing it
• US lawmakers will have 60 days to review it and vote up or down, and only a two-thirds majority can stop the president from canceling them out
• Netanyahu insisted that Israel isn't bound to honor the terms of the deal with Tehran's mullahs, and his aides want him to go all-in to persuade US lawmakers to reject it
• Most recent White House race entrant, Scott Walker, says no future president is obligated to maintain the deal since it's not a formal treaty

PUBLISHED: 23:16, 14 July 2015 | UPDATED: 05:13, 15 July 2015

• SHARE PICTURE

​

+10


'STUNNING HISTORIC MISTAKE': Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu slammed the Obama-led nuclear deal with the Islamic Republican of Iran on Tuesday, and now is expected to leverage his relationships in the U.S. Congress to kill it

+10


GRAHAM-SLAM: 'This is the most dangerous, irresponsible step I've ever seen in the history of watching the Mideast,' said South Carolina Republcian Senator Lindsey Graham





Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, the most recent entrant into the White House race, said in a statement that no future president would be required to maintain the deal Obama struck, which is not a formal treaty between governments.


'I call on all congressional leaders and presidential candidates, including Secretary Clinton, to repudiate this agreement,' he said.


'Iran’s Supreme Leader should know that a future American president will not be bound by this diplomatic retreat.'


Donald Trump, the billionaire real estate tycoon in the GOP field, was more pointed and called the deal 'very dangerous.'


'Iran developing a nuclear weapon, either through uranium or nuclear fuel, and defying the world is still a very real possibility,' he said.



'Iran gets everything and loses nothing. ... This is a bad deal that sets a dangerous precedent. This deal sets off a nuclear arms race in the Middle East, which is the most-unstable region in the world. It is a horrible and perhaps catastrophic event for Israel.'




'I guarantee,' Trump added, that Iran is 'much closer to producing a nuclear weapon than they were at the start of negotiations. The fact is, the U.S. has incompetent leaders and even more incompetent negotiators.'

 

[The Guesser]

I figured as much.

You can't counter a single point he makes (you couldn't even if you had listened to what he said), so you babble about the source instead. Whenever you post an inane article, I can both discredit the source and also point out the flaws in logic of what's written any time I please. You only do the former since you aren't smart enough to do the latter.

If Mark Levin ever talks about who would win between The Rock and Andre the Giant in a steel cage match, maybe I'll post that sound byte for you. That seems to be a much better fit for your wheelhouse.

Listened to every word. I used to be a big Levin fan. He cracks me up. Marky would have more cred analyzing an Andre Match. Speaking of Cred, how's that future coming along? How about the future hedges?

 

[Dave007inVegas]

 

[Dave007inVegas]

President Obama ridiculed CBS’ White House correspondent, Major Garrett, for asking a critical question during Tuesday’s press conference on the Iran nuclear deal.

GARRETT: Can you tell the country, sir, how you are content, with all the fanfare of this deal, to leave the conscience of this nation, the strength of this nation unaccounted for in relation to [the four Americans currently jailed in Iran]…

OBAMA: I’ve got to give you credit for how you craft those questions. First of all, the notion that I am “content” [pause] as I “celebrate” with American citizens languishing in Iranian jail [pause]…

Major, that’s nonsense. And you should know better.

What happened to “I welcome a robust debate in Congress on this issue, and I welcome scrutiny of the details of this agreement.”

Sanctimonious ass wipe.

 

[Acebb]

If this deal is so great, why is Obama getting push back from his own party?

 

[JDeuce]

If this deal is so great, why is Obama getting push back from his own party?

Meh.

No matter what forum, message board you go to (even on talk shows)...when presented with the ugly truth about their criminal and disgusting party, dimocraps will....

Step 1: Ignore it as much as possible, fail to report on it. Call it fake news, right-wing propaganda and refuse to engage on the subject.

Step 2: If forced to engage on the topic, attempt to deflect -- "Republicans do it, too!" -- "Republicans HATE ___________!!" Fill in the blank. Women, blacks, fags, camel-fuckers, Hispanics, whatever.

Step 3: Attack the source. Part of that is attacking the source with such venom and such hatred that the whole topic switches from whatever it was originally about to a hate-filled slugfest. Eventually, everybody forgets what the original topic was about. See how Dylann Roof somehow morphed into the Confederate Flag coming down becoming the Left's Berlin Wall moment if you want an example.

It's the Alinsky way. And dimocraps use it EVERYWHERE. It's mostly successful because Republicans and other patriots aren't really good at countering hatred...which is ALL the dimocrap party is based on. Well...that, and lies.

My apologies to all of you Democrats that think the dimocrap party still represents you. It doesn't. About time you realized that today's dimocraps practice situational ethics. There is no right or wrong...only that which forwards and supports their agenda and world views is correct.

 

[ScottL]

Five Musts For A Deal With Iran

1. INSPECTIONS AND VERIFICATION
Inspectors must be permitted unimpeded access to suspect sites.
A good deal must support “anytime, anywhere” inspections – including all military facilities – to
verify Iranian compliance. Iran’s decades-long history of cheating on international obligations
suggests it will secretly attempt to continue its nuclear weapons program. Iran cannot be permitted
any safe havens where it could pursue this ambition.

2. POSSIBLE MILITARY DIMENSIONS
Iran must fully explain its prior weaponization efforts.
A good deal must require Iran to come clean on all of its prior nuclear work, such as developing
triggers for a nuclear weapon, as required by six United Nations Security Council resolutions.
The entire scope of Iran’s nuclear activities must be known to establish a baseline against which to
measure future actions. Iran must also be made to comply with prior commitments;
allowing Iran to shirk them will only tempt it to defy commitments made under a new deal.

3. SANCTIONS
Sanctions relief must commence only after Iran complies with its commitments.
A good deal must lift sanctions gradually as Iran meets its obligations under the agreement.
Further, any deal should specify clear and immediate consequences for Iranian violations. The
international community must retain significant leverage while Iran demonstrates compliance; it
must not provide immediate sanctions relief or unfreeze a significant portion of Tehran’s assets so
Iran can “take the money and run.”

4. DURATION
Iran’s nuclear weapons quest must be blocked for decades.
A good deal must prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear threshold state. The announced framework
would lift nuclear restrictions in 10 to 15 years and grant Iran virtually instant breakout time after
12 or 13 years. A deal must restrict Iran’s nuclear capabilities until it demonstrates conclusively, over
time, that it no longer seeks a nuclear weapons capability.

5. DISMANTLEMENT
Iran must dismantle its nuclear infrastructure so it has no path to a nuclear weapon.
A good deal must require Iran to dismantle its nuclear infrastructure and relinquish its uranium
stockpile such that it has neither a uranium nor plutonium pathway to nuclear weapons.

These 5 points go into deeper detail in the following PDF:
http://www.aipac.org/~/media/Public.../Negotiating with Iran_5 Requirements_All.pdf

Probably 0 for 5 here.
How's this for irony? The US and Iran negotiated this deal, but Iran says none of the inspectors can be Americans because we have no diplomatic relations with America.

 

[Acebb]

The country is in the very best of hands

The only Obama administration official to view confidential "side deals" between Iran and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) admitted Wednesday she and her team have only seen rough drafts.
"I didn't see the final documents. I saw the provisional documents, as did my experts," said Wendy Sherman, a lead U.S. negotiator for the deal, at a Senate Banking Committee hearing.

Sherman, undersecretary of State for political affairs, said she was only allowed to see the confidential deals "in the middle of the negotiation" when the IAEA "wanted to go over with some of our experts the technical details." She maintained the deals — which focus on with Iran's prior work on a bomb and access to Iran's Parchin military site — are still confidential and can't be submitted to Congress.

 

[SheriffJoe]

Meh.

No matter what forum, message board you go to (even on talk shows)...when presented with the ugly truth about their criminal and disgusting party, dimocraps will....

Step 1: Ignore it as much as possible, fail to report on it. Call it fake news, right-wing propaganda and refuse to engage on the subject.

Step 2: If forced to engage on the topic, attempt to deflect -- "Republicans do it, too!" -- "Republicans HATE ___________!!" Fill in the blank. Women, blacks, fags, camel-fuckers, Hispanics, whatever.

Step 3: Attack the source. Part of that is attacking the source with such venom and such hatred that the whole topic switches from whatever it was originally about to a hate-filled slugfest. Eventually, everybody forgets what the original topic was about. See how Dylann Roof somehow morphed into the Confederate Flag coming down becoming the Left's Berlin Wall moment if you want an example.

It's the Alinsky way. And dimocraps use it EVERYWHERE. It's mostly successful because Republicans and other patriots aren't really good at countering hatred...which is ALL the dimocrap party is based on. Well...that, and lies.

My apologies to all of you Democrats that think the dimocrap party still represents you. It doesn't. About time you realized that today's dimocraps practice situational ethics. There is no right or wrong...only that which forwards and supports their agenda and world views is correct.

Donald Trump and I aren't ideological soulmates by any means but he sure is putting on a clinic on how to handle these evil manipulative commies.

Notice he's always on the offense, never on the defense, and whenever someone is dumb enough to attack, he twists it around and throws it right back in their face.

I hope Republicans are taking notes but somehow I doubt it. The only one who uses the same playbook is Cruz...maybe a few others in Congress.

The rest are self-serving cowards and beyond useless.

 

[Dave007inVegas]

Donald Trump and I aren't ideological soulmates by any means but he sure is putting on a clinic on how to handle these evil manipulative commies.

Notice he's always on the offense, never on the defense, and whenever someone is dumb enough to attack, he twists it around and throws it right back in their face.

I hope Republicans are taking notes but somehow I doubt it. The only one who uses the same playbook is Cruz...maybe a few others in Congress.

The rest are self-serving cowards and beyond useless.

Amen brother.

 

[Acebb]

Well, after the NY Times Magazine reporting on Ben Rhodes & the Obama White House, we now know everything dipshit guesser believes about the deal is false and Rhodes is bragging about it.


[h=1]Obama's Foreign Policy Guru Boasts of How the Administration Lied to Sell the Iran Deal[/h]
[h=1]This skilled storyteller duped America into passing Iran deal[/h]
It is comical how not that bright & easily misled people like guesser are.

 

[busterhyman]

obuma is a muslim and any deal to help muslims - he wll do.

 

[The Guesser]

obuma is a muslim and any deal to help muslims - he wll do.

Especially killing them.

 

[carlspackler]

Especially killing them.

Have you seen the body little lyin' Guesser?

 

[Dave007inVegas]

Why the Iran Deal Makes Obama's Critics So Angry

This?

Iran claims to successfully test missile that can reach Israel. The highly accurate ballistic missile has a range of 2,000 kilometers, was launched two weeks ago, Tehran general says.

http://www.timesofisrael.com/iran-claims-to-successfully-test-missile-that-can-reach-israel/

 

[superbeets]

 

[busterhyman]

is it time for iran -to make their move on israel- while obuma is still in office.

 

[The Guesser]

is it time for iran -to make their move on israel- while obuma is still in office.

So you want Iran to attack Israel and start a War? An Anti Semite also. Fits.