Colts backers should be disappointed. Having said that, they weren't exactly moving the ball, just had one fluke play in the 2nd half, where the DB was sleeping. There is no reason to believe the Colts would have moved the ball in OT, but they may have.
This game should not have gone into OT to begin with.
This game should not have gone into OT to begin with.
I didn't see the first penalty in OT, but the 2nd and 3rd calls had to be made, they were obvious and easy.
Overtime rules are fair.
Team A gets to play special teams/offense
Team B gets to play special teams/defense
AT LEAST.
The NFL doesn't want another Q, because what happens if you are tied after another 15 min? 1pm overtime games ruin the viewship for 4pm games and the nfl doesn't want that. This is a TV revenue generated league. The NFL wants a quick, relatavely fair way to decide the game and this sudden death is that.
This game proves that the Colts win because of Manning and not dungy. His defense had a chance at the end, but they lost, while is QB sat on the sidelines.
Team A gets to play special teams/offense
Team B gets to play special teams/defense
AT LEAST.
The NFL doesn't want another Q, because what happens if you are tied after another 15 min? 1pm overtime games ruin the viewship for 4pm games and the nfl doesn't want that. This is a TV revenue generated league. The NFL wants a quick, relatavely fair way to decide the game and this sudden death is that.
This game proves that the Colts win because of Manning and not dungy. His defense had a chance at the end, but they lost, while is QB sat on the sidelines.
Was the first call a bad call? I was walking away from the TV and didn't watch the replay or even see the call. I do know it was 2nd and 4 and I was thinking it was going to be 2nd and 14. Obviously, it wasn't offensive holding. However, if no penalty was called, SD may have converted a 3rd and 4.
If I had the Colts, I'd probably be bitching too.
the overtime starts at about 7 minutes...the highlights from the game,basically shows san diego walking all over them the whole game..
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/70txuNu5RHM&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/70txuNu5RHM&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/70txuNu5RHM&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/70txuNu5RHM&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
Watching the highlights to see what happened in a game isn't a very good representation.
If so, you would think that all runningbacks do is run for long touchdowns, all Michael Vick did was run for long gains ( without all those passes he over/underthrew).
You'd think the baseball player that struck out 4 times in a game but bashed a home run the 5th at bat was some super slugger.
If so, you would think that all runningbacks do is run for long touchdowns, all Michael Vick did was run for long gains ( without all those passes he over/underthrew).
You'd think the baseball player that struck out 4 times in a game but bashed a home run the 5th at bat was some super slugger.
Please ignore my friend Parlay when it comes to do with SD or USC... his homer tinted shades have him seeing one thing only...all the time. I've often wondered why he doesn't try out for the USC cheerleading squad. I mean he can toss hot 20 year olds in the air, hold them perched up high by there tight little asses and most of all root, root, root for his team :lol:
I thought about this one about a year ago. I like it a lot. 
