Now that we have embraced homosexuality, is pedophilia next? ("I didn't choose this. I'm born this way and cannot change")

[SheriffJoe]

Again, thankfully nobody is trying to normalize this behavior:

The pedophile I could not help: He was not a monster or a molester. The system destroyed him anyway

"he was kind and sweet!"

Note that Salon seems absolutely obsessed with this topic

Yep, Salon is definitely mainstream left - the higher education intellectual zeitgeist.

How long before Time, People and Rolling Stone jump on the pedi bandwagon publishing their own sob stories appealing for compassion and understanding?

Note how they are using the exact same familiar "homosexuals are normal people too, ya know" script to brainwash the masses yet again.

Disgusting!

 

[vitterd]

Yep, Salon is definitely mainstream left - the higher education intellectual zeitgeist.

How long before Time, People and Rolling Stone jump on the pedi bandwagon publishing their own sob stories appealing for compassion and understanding?

Note how they are using the exact same familiar "homosexuals are normal people too, ya know" script to brainwash the masses yet again.

Disgusting!

Gay marriage legal in Canada. You same loons said that would lead to normalize pedophiles back then. Why hasn't that happened yet? Just like your breaking birther news....completely in your own imagination.

 

[SheriffJoe]

Acebb: there is a movement underway to normalize pedophilia

vtard: Uhh, no there isn't! That's Breitbart scaring you wackos again! One or two people doesn't consist of a movement! vtard is right again - another knockout! Take a break, Acebb...it's getting "Sheriff Joe" ugly for you down here Blah, blah, blah....

Acebb: What about Salon? Not mainstream left enough for you? Here are several links.

vtard: Well...uhhhh...Canada, something, something, something...

Sure, vtard, sure...having completely been proven wrong - AGAIN! - on your first strawman, just ignore the facts and move on to the next one!

"Another knockout!" - poker fraud vtard

 

[vitterd]

Salon website and no active groups in the United States. Yeah, the movement is really out there. A movement only right wingers think is there.

Still waiting on Canada to consider pedophile normal. That was your argument when you were Joe Contrarian. Like everything you predict will happen......you never see it happen. Still waiting on that big birther news from 2013!!!

 

[festeringZit]

[ Hey why shouldn't these two faggots be able to "marry" they are two consenting adults right? I was right again. You redefine marriage, and
the whole concept goes out the door ]


[h=1]Father And Adopted Son Want To Get Married[/h]Posted By: Red Dawnon: November 04, 2015In: LGBT Print Email

​

I don’t even know if this should be grouped in with other “slippery slope” arguments. This is so jacked up, it may require its very own category of wack.
According to that sourcelink, Nino Esposito and his adopted son Roland “Drew” Bosee want to get married. The duo has apparently been a couple for the past 40 years.

In 2012, Esposito legally adopted Bosee, because they never thought same-sex marriage would become legal. That presents a major problem. They want to get married now but can’t, because you can’t legally marry your son. Obviously.
They’re now trying to undo the adoption, but a state trial court judge denied their request because adoption annulments are typically limited to cases of fraud.

“We never thought we’d see the day” that same-sex marriage would be legal in Pennsylvania, Esposito, 78, told CNN in a telephone interview.
The adoption “gave us the most legitimate thing available to us” at the time, said Bosee, 68.
The adoption process Bosee and Esposito went through was not uncommon. Although it is difficult to gather hard numbers, the ACLU of Pennsylvania, a group supporting the couple, says it learned that many couples in states across the country lawfully took advantage of adoption laws in order to protect their relationships. Now these couples seek to marry, but first they must confront state adoption laws that provide no easy path to annulment.
​

If you’re thinking, “WTH” congrats. You’re a normal human being.
The duo says they know of other couples who had their adoptions annulled and don’t see why they’re being denied the same request.

But Judge Lawrence J. O’Toole, of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, ruled against the couple. He noted that the primary purpose of the adoption was to reduce the Pennsylvania inheritance tax payable upon the death of one of the men from 15% to 4%, “as the two men would now be in a parent-child relationship instead of a third party relationship.”
O’Toole said he was “sensitive to the situation” but noted that despite the fact Esposito and Bosee desire to marry, “they cannot do so because they are legally father and son.”
“This Court welcomes direction from our appellate courts in handling parallel cases,” O’Toole wrote.
​

They’re still sorting things out, but yeah. This is what’s happenin’ in Pennsylvania these days.

 

[festeringZit]

[ Gee look, people changing their sexual *preference*... sigh ]

[h=1]Can Sexual Preference Change With Age?[/h][h=2]Research shows attraction can be fluid when love is involved[/h]by Dr. Pepper Schwartz, June 13, 2014|Comment: 1

Researchers are discovering that a person's sexual orientation is not carved in stone — Istock

En español | Sometimes a person's life undergoes such a radical transformation that the change was inconceivable before it occurred. One such gobsmacking event happens when you unexpectedly fall in love with someone who never would have pinged your "relationship radar" before. If a homosexual (or heterosexual) thought has never crossed your mind, for example, it can be doubly astonishing when —wham! — you suddenly find yourself attracted to someone of an entirely new gender.
That may sound unlikely, but as researchers are discovering, a person's sexual orientation is not carved in stone. In her influential book Sexual Fluidity, psychology professor Lisa M. Diamond chronicled her research on 80 nonheterosexual women over a period of 10 years. During that time, Diamond discovered, a significant number of the women had reported changing their sexual orientation. The most frequent cause for the U-turn? The "switchers" had fallen in love with a member of the opposite sex.


Join the discussion: Talk openly with other folks about love, sex and relationships.

[h=2]Related[/h]

• Same-sex marriage and Medicare
• Sex at 50-plus: What's normal?
  
• "Friends with benefits" at 50-plus?
• Why long-married couples split up
• How sex changes for men after 50

Join AARP Today — Receive access to exclusive information, benefits and discounts

​

These women were not unhappy being lesbians, but love, it seems, really can conquer all — including a person's lifelong sexual orientation up to the moment when she falls hard for someone of a previously ignored gender.
The research on men shows somewhat less flexibility. But Diamond and other researchers have compiled numerous case studies of gay men who spent years feeling (and acting) fully and comfortably homosexual, only then to fall unexpectedly in love with a heterosexual woman.
Recently, I interviewed two people who went through this sexual upheaval late in life themselves. Both said they had never even considered falling in love with someone of the same — or opposite — gender until they reached their 50s or 60s. Only at that relatively late stage in life did they undergo startling 180-degree turns in their sexual orientation. (While the facts of each case are accurate, I've used pseudonyms at the subjects' request.)
Violet — a tall, striking woman of 60 with snow-white hair — had never married, but she had enjoyed major love affairs with men. Intensely dedicated to her career, she became a TV executive at age 40. After her last relationship with a man ended in her 40s, Violet says she "gave up on love."


[h=2]Save Money[/h]Get AARP member discounts on travel, shopping and more









Then she met Susan.
A marketing expert, Susan was in a pleasant but not passionate heterosexual marriage at the time. She valued her extended family — husband, two children and their spouses, and four grandchildren — more than anything else. Susan had never beenunfaithful. She had never been attracted to another woman. But from the moment she and Violet began working together on a project, sparks flew, shocking both women. A physical relationship of 12 years ensued.



When Violet finally admitted to herself that the two women would never enjoy a fully realized partnership, she ended the relationship. (Susan's husband knew about his wife's involvement and tolerated it, but neither he nor Susan was willing to jeopardize their close-knit family relations.) Violet loved Susan with all her heart, but she did not define herself as gay in the wake of the affair — nor has she become involved in another same-sex relationship since. Her "sexual turnaround" applied to Susan and Susan alone.
Ned had been gay his entire adult life. Though he had a few sexual relationships with women in high school, he never thought of himself as heterosexual or even bisexual: Ned liked women, but he loved men.
When he was 29, Ned fell deeply in love with Gerry, a man 10 years older. They remained a couple for 23 years, which included getting married in 2008, the year California first permittedsame-sex unions. Like most spouses, Ned and Gerry had their ups and downs, but they always considered their marriage rock-solid.
Then, turmoil: Gerry was falsely accused of improprieties at work. Eventually, he was exonerated, but Gerry's legal defense took a toll — both personally and financially — on the couple. To help restock their coffers, Ned entered graduate school, where he started spending a lot of time with fellow students. Before long, he had fallen deeply in love with one of them, a woman named Elsa.
Gerry was naturally stunned when Ned asked him for a divorce. The split unfolded amicably enough, but Gerry saw Ned's actions as inconceivable and unexplainable. Within a year Ned and Elsa were married and had a baby daughter; their marriage remains strong today.
These stories are unusual, but they are not unique. They point up how imperfectly behavioral scientists understand what attracts us to a certain person at one time in our lives, but to a completely different kind of person at another. Violet and Ned add two more bits of anecdotal evidence to our dawning understanding that many of us possess more sexual flexibility than we ever knew.

 

[SheriffJoe]

[ Hey why shouldn't these two faggots be able to "marry" they are two consenting adults right? I was right again. You redefine marriage, and

the whole concept goes out the door ]


Father And Adopted Son Want To Get Married

Posted By: Red Dawnon: November 04, 2015In: LGBTPrintEmail

​

I don’t even know if this should be grouped in with other “slippery slope” arguments. This is so jacked up, it may require its very own category of wack.
According to that sourcelink, Nino Esposito and his adopted son Roland “Drew” Bosee want to get married. The duo has apparently been a couple for the past 40 years.

In 2012, Esposito legally adopted Bosee, because they never thought same-sex marriage would become legal. That presents a major problem. They want to get married now but can’t, because you can’t legally marry your son. Obviously.
They’re now trying to undo the adoption, but a state trial court judge denied their request because adoption annulments are typically limited to cases of fraud.

“We never thought we’d see the day” that same-sex marriage would be legal in Pennsylvania, Esposito, 78, told CNN in a telephone interview.
The adoption “gave us the most legitimate thing available to us” at the time, said Bosee, 68.
The adoption process Bosee and Esposito went through was not uncommon. Although it is difficult to gather hard numbers, the ACLU of Pennsylvania, a group supporting the couple, says it learned that many couples in states across the country lawfully took advantage of adoption laws in order to protect their relationships. Now these couples seek to marry, but first they must confront state adoption laws that provide no easy path to annulment.
​

If you’re thinking, “WTH” congrats. You’re a normal human being.
The duo says they know of other couples who had their adoptions annulled and don’t see why they’re being denied the same request.

But Judge Lawrence J. O’Toole, of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, ruled against the couple. He noted that the primary purpose of the adoption was to reduce the Pennsylvania inheritance tax payable upon the death of one of the men from 15% to 4%, “as the two men would now be in a parent-child relationship instead of a third party relationship.”
O’Toole said he was “sensitive to the situation” but noted that despite the fact Esposito and Bosee desire to marry, “they cannot do so because they are legally father and son.”
“This Court welcomes direction from our appellate courts in handling parallel cases,” O’Toole wrote.
​

They’re still sorting things out, but yeah. This is what’s happenin’ in Pennsylvania these days.

But, but, but...they were born that way and love each other.

What's wrong with that?

 

[festeringZit]

[ Big gay hate machine in California out to get tenured prof. Prof was raised by lesbians, and speaks adamantly against gay marriage and gay adoption ]



[h=1]CONSERVATIVE PROF MAY LOSE TENURE AFTER LGBT PRESSURE[/h]

359​

1​

65​

Reuters

by AUSTIN RUSE9 Nov 2015227

[h=2]Professor Robert Oscar Lopez says he always suspected the day would come when his employer, the University of California, Northridge, would move to oust him from his tenured position teaching English literature.[/h]Lopez became quite famous a few years ago after he “outed” himself as both bi-sexual and having been raised by lesbians. Writing in the academic online journal The Public Discourse three years ago, Lopez wrote his upbringing by two lesbians had been harmful to him and that he now opposed same-sex marriage. Despite appearing on a relatively small site, Lopez’s explosive essay has more than 9,000 Facebook shares.
Lopez was a marked man from that moment. Lopez became an even more outspoken opponent of gay marriage, gay adoption and gay surrogacy. He founded a movement for children’s rights, filed an amicus brief in favor of man-woman marriage with the Supreme Court, and published a book about attacks on him and his colleagues by the Big Gay Hate Machine.
He now charges that some of the groups after him, including the gay Human Rights Campaign, GLAAD and others, likely sent students into his classes to gin up charges against him so that he would be harassed into silence and eventually dismissed. Whether that’s true or not, at least one student did begin to monitor Lopez and she did begin filing charges against him sometime in 2014.
The charges against Lopez shifted almost constantly and to this day he has never been shown the formal complaint from the still-unidentified former student. His understanding of the charges against him have been from meetings with university administrators and taking notes.
Her first complaint centered around a conference called The Bonds that Matter that Lopez organized at the Reagan Library, a forty-minute drive from the UC-Northridge campus. The conference featured noted speakers on divorce, third party reproduction, and adoption.
She says she was coerced into attending, that she was never informed of what the subject matter of the conference would be, and that she was offended by some of what she heard that day. She said the conference should have come with a trigger warning that it might cause trauma to gays and lesbians. She also said she broke down “in tears, crying.”
She says speakers explained that “all women who use sperm banks are evil” and that “gay people cannot be good parents.” She also complained about a brochure produced by the Ruth Institute she picked up at the conference aimed at the “victims of the sexual revolution” including those who tried the gay life and now want out.
Once the complaint was made, Lopez stepped beyond the Looking Glass and into the world of university investigations. For the next 378 days Lopez and his paid lawyers spent countless hours trying to keep up with the charges and investigations by multiple university administrates and their lawyers.
All the along the way, Lopez reports that he was considered guilty. In a blog post, Lopez writes, “Once you place a faculty member under investigation, the gears are in motion for a hellish inquest, involving gag orders, document productions, interrogations, and ruinous anxiety because the professor has no idea what’s going to happen next.”
He was formally charged with “discrimination,” one of the few charges that can result in revocation of tenure and dismissal. In one of the early interrogations, a university administrator “started repeating the view that my conference at the Reagan Library was similar to a meeting of the Ku Klux Klan, that that what I’d done was the same as tricking students into going to a white supremacist anti-black rally.”
It should be noted that the speakers at the conference, while controversial, are not considered wild-eyed radicals. Jennifer Lahl speaks on the dangers to women of selling their eggs or renting their wombs. She’s from Berkley and is a frequent guest on liberal campuses. In fact, Lahl specializes in speaking to the left. Alana Newman spoke, a folk singer, who was born from surrogacy and is now an advocate against it. Perhaps the most controversial speaker was Jennifer Roback Morse who runs the Ruth Institute and who focuses broadly on what she calls the “victims of the sexual revolution.”
None of the speakers talked about gay issues and Lopez provided the tapes to prove it. There was one exchange between Newman and one student who asked about gays and surrogacy, but the student turned out to be the complainant. So, the only person who brought up the gay issue at the conference was the student who complained the conference slammed gays.
Lopez provided documents that also showed the students were not coerced. In fact, they didn’t even have to attend the conference. It was one of two options in the course. Most of the class chose the conference option.
After a year long investigation, the university returned a report to Lopez on October 16. The charge of “discrimination” had disappeared. In its place was a charge of creating a “hostile learning environment,” something that appeared for the very first time in this document, and the charge of “retaliation.”
The young woman charged that even though Lopez gave her an “A” in the class, he did not nominate her paper for an award because there was “bad blood” between them. There was no proof of such a assertion, only her word against his, but the university has determined that her credibility is superior to his and so they have found he is guilty of retaliatory acts and they are now considering what to do with him.
In a lengthy blog post, Lopez writes that one of his colleagues noted the young student had long been investigating Lopez, reading his work in The Federalist and First Things and asking questions about him. Lopez believes she was put up to this by wealthy LGBT groups dedicated to bringing him down. He notes that the gay Human Rights Campaign issued a report in the middle of this investigation that charged Lopez with spreading anti-LGBT hate around the globe. They printed the name of his employer and clearly hoped his job would be put in jeopardy.
Even if Lopez keeps his job, the Big Gay Hate Machine has won a victory. Even Lopez might trim his sails in the coming months and years. After all, who wants to go through something like that again. Moreover, the warning is strong to all other academics who might be tempted to stray from the liberal plantation. You do so at your own and your family’s peril.

 

[SheriffJoe]

Doctors Could Be 5 Years Away From Uterine Transplants for Men

http://cnsnews.com/blog/melanie-hunter/doctors-could-be-5-years-away-uterine-transplants-men

What could possibly go wrong?

 

[festeringZit]

 

[festeringZit]

More of ... "I told you so"

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...-will-marry-his-2-fiancees-in-august-ceremony

[h=1]Ronaldinho Reportedly Will Marry His 2 Fiancees in August Ceremony[/h]GIANNI VERSCHUEREN
MAY 24, 2018
[FONT=&quot]

Robert Hradil/Getty Images
Brazilian football legend Ronaldinho will reportedly "marry" two women at the same time during a small wedding ceremony in August.
While polygamy is outlawed in Brazil, O Dia (h/t Dan Gartland of Sports Illustrated) reported civil unions between more than two persons is not uncommon. Ronaldinho, Priscilla Coelho and Beatriz Souza already live together.
Mirror Football shared this image of the three:
View image on Twitter

Mirror Football
✔@MirrorFootball





Barcelona legend Ronaldinho 'to marry two women at the same' time after living with pair since December https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/football-legend-ronaldinho-marry-two-12587277 …
5:18 AM - May 24, 2018

• 
  2,951
• 
  2,372 people are talking about this

​

Twitter Ads info and privacy








Per O Dia (h/t Mirror's Matt Roper), Ronaldinho asked for their hand in marriage in January of last year. He originally dated Coelho before meeting Souza in 2016.
O Dia's report added Ronaldinho's sister will not attend the ceremony, as she does not approve of the union. Coelho's family also does not approve, with a friend telling Extra (h/t Gartland): "They are upset because they discovered that every present he gives to Priscilla, he also gives to the other girl."
[/FONT]

 

[festeringZit]

[ Another Democrat voter for sure... Told you so. Here we have a Univ Texas Prof pushing this deviant shit ]

[h=1]Texas Professor Argues for Men to Have Sex With Children, Flees Home[/h][h=2]Austin-Based professor has previously been published by NAMBLA[/h]

[FONT=&quot]by LIONEL DU CANE
March 24, 2020

[COLOR=inherit !important]​

0
​

[/FONT][/COLOR]



Share on FacebookShare on Twitterhttps://reddit.com/submit?url=https...for+Men+to+Have+Sex+With+Children,+Flees+Homehttps://nationalfile.com/texas-prof...g3I51mFpwkzoht-PJni0DkGPVtyuqrzTLMBPXGNPNEQ0#

​

[h=4]A Texas professor who has previously argued in favor of lowering the age of consent and reducing punishments for pedophiles has fled women-led protests against his controversial work.[/h]Thomas Hubbard, a Classics professor at The University of Texas in Austin, fled his home and was placed under police protection, according to Incendiary News.
Protesters flooded his driveway carrying a large banner with the message that read, ” “Professor Thomas Hubbard: Pedophile.”
The protesters chanted “Thomas Hubbard is a creep! Keep an eye out when you sleep!” and “When women and children are under attack, what do we do? Stand up, fight back!”

​

The incident prompted the academic to flee his home.
Hubbard, who has had work published by the controversial NAMBLA–North American Man Boy Love Association–, has faced accusations of pedophilia and misogyny for his inflammatory work.
Law Enforcement Today wrote:

Hubbard has written about pederasty, which was a “prominent social phenomenon in numerous ancient Greek cultures” where men and boys had “relationships.” In this case, sexual relationships.
Hubbard has written that “contemporary American legislation premised on children’s incapacity to ‘consent’ to sexual relations stems from outmoded gender constructions and ideological preoccupations of the late Victorian and Progressive Era.”
​

Part of Hubbard’s argument involves the restrictive nature of the laws of consent–the fact that they prohibit the liberation of those boys’ sexualities.

​

According to Law Enforcement Today, another suggestion the classicist made was for fatherless boys to patch over their lack of a father by having male role models lay with them–in a pre-modern sense.
Law Enforcement Today continued:

In his writing, this bozo argues that Ancient Greece showed us that “where age discrepant relationships are commonplace and positively reinforced, they cause little or no long-term harm to the younger partner and often confer great benefit,” he writes.
This was contained in a 22-page article Hubbard wrote for a journal called Thymos, entitled “Sexual Consent and the Adolescent Male, or What Can We Learn From the Greeks.”
​

Hubbard also led a class called “Mythology of Rape,” where he invited participants to share their experiences with sexual assault.
One student reportedly said:

“He also had us write a paper over lowering the age of consent and lowering the punishment for sexually assaulting a child under the age of 6 (apparently 6 and under don’t know assault is bad, they only think it is bad later on because they are told it is bad). We were also asked our sexual preferences in class and asked if we ever had a desire to be raped.”
​

Sadly, this isn’t the first time representatives of higher education have made similar pronouncements.
Last year, a San Diego College was reportedly teaching pedophilia as a sexual orientation.
Many other schools have begun to implement radical sexual lifestyles into their curricula–usually under the guise of promoting tolerance or understanding.