Brady is 3-4 in Super Bowls if Seattle n ATL don't literally hand him the trophy. He's played for the best coach to ever coach in the NFL. Brady is top 10 all time but he's not top 5 in my book. Peyton was better
i can make a legitimate argument that Tony Romo is better then Brady. Romo has a better completion % more yards per attempt and a higher passer rating and QBR.
superbowls are a team stat not a way to judge players that's my opinion
Brady is 3-4 in Super Bowls if Seattle n ATL don't literally hand him the trophy. He's played for the best coach to ever coach in the NFL. Brady is top 10 all time but he's not top 5 in my book. Peyton was better
i can make a legitimate argument that Tony Romo is better then Brady. Romo has a better completion % more yards per attempt and a higher passer rating and QBR.
superbowls are a team stat not a way to judge players that's my opinion
Brady is 3-4 in Super Bowls if Seattle n ATL don't literally hand him the trophy. He's played for the best coach to ever coach in the NFL. Brady is top 10 all time but he's not top 5 in my book. Peyton was better
i can make a legitimate argument that Tony Romo is better then Brady. Romo has a better completion % more yards per attempt and a higher passer rating and QBR.
superbowls are a team stat not a way to judge players that's my opinion
Lets put this to rest.
Walsh/Montana 4-0 1.000%
Brady/Belichick 5-2 .714%
And Montana played before the skirt era, where hard hits, play after play, year after year, were part of the game.
I'll give you Peyton though.
Lets put this to rest.
Walsh/Montana 4-0 1.000%
Brady/Belichick 5-2 .714%
And Montana played before the skirt era, where hard hits, play after play, year after year, were part of the game.
I'll give you Peyton though.
For the record, I don't believe any of this in and by itself proves who's better, and I don't think anyone can win these arguments
But if you do so strongly that you think this "puts it to rest", then you have to conclude Brady is better
Lets put this to rest.
Walsh/Montana 4-0 1.000%
Brady/Belichick 5-2 .714%
And Montana played before the skirt era, where hard hits, play after play, year after year, were part of the game.
I'll give you Peyton though.
why didn't Montana play in more SB's?
Do you actually think it's better to lose before you get there than it is the lose when you get there?
why did Montana play in only 6 Conference Championship games? going 4-2? Brady is 7-4. Do you think 4-2 is better than 7-4 too?
Total playoffs; Brady 25-9 and Montana 16-7
Career record regular season
TB 183-52 77.9%
JM 117-47 71.3%
For the record, I don't believe any of this in and by itself proves who's better, and I don't think anyone can win these arguments
But if you do so strongly that you think this "puts it to rest", then you have to conclude Brady is better