motive, if you're reading about an unsubstantiated allegation included within an obvious hit piece written by an obviously biased reporter, should you think about it just a tad?
does it make sense? what is their motive? what else did the author provide?
well lets see, what's being said in connection with this story:
And unsubstantiated accusations of cheating have long dogged the team, stemming from their Super Bowl wins in 2002, 2004 and 2005. The St. Louis Rams claimed the team illegally videotaped their walk-through practices prior to the 2002 game, and players on the other defeated opponents have said the Patriots seemed to have inside knowledge of their playbooks.
The Patriots were also accused of flouting the rules in the game before Sunday’s contest, in which they beat the Baltimore Ravens using unorthodox formations that Ravens Coach John Harbaugh said were designed to confuse the officials and his defense.
-----------------------------------------------------
yep, haters going to hate
Biased reporter? It's being reported by every major news outlet. This isn't just one guy out to get the Patriots. Come on man, you know better.