System (B) Game #1 3Q OKC -2.5 -110 5dimes (Fading Phoenix)
Risk: 27.50
Win: 25
System (B) Game #1 3Q Utah -2.5 -110 5dimes (Fading LAL)
Risk: 27.50
Win: 25
System (B) Game #1 3Q Golden State -4 -110 5dimes
Risk: 27.50
Win: 25
(<)<GLTA Couch
System (A) Gm 1 3Q Cleveland -3 -115
Risk: 28.75
Win: 25
System (A) Gm 1 3Q San Antonio -4 -110
Risk: 27.50
Win: 25
System (B) Gm 1 3Q Milwaukee -2 -105
Risk: 26.25
Win: 25
System (A)
Gm 1 = 4-3 (+18.75)
Gm 2 = NR
Gm 3 = NR
Pending chase's : Gm 2 Portland , Gm 2 Golden St , Gm 2 Cleveland
System (B)
Gm 1 = 1-3-1 (-57.50)
Gm 2 = NR
Gm 3 = NR
Pending Chase's: Gm 2 Golden St , (F) Gm 2 LAL , (F) Gm 2 Phoenix
System (A) Gm 1 3Q LAC -2 -110
Risk: 27.50
Win: 25
More to come !!!
there was a guy here about 5 years ago with a 1Q chase system...he played favorites on the ML. Since it was on the ML, the chase got expensive really quickly but at the end of the season he profited a nice amount.
System (B) Gm 1 3Q Detroit -2 -110 (Fading Milwaukee) ......................LOSER
Risk: 27.50
Win: 25
System (B) Gm 1 3Q San Antonio -1.5 -110 ...................LOSER
Risk: 27.50
Win: 25
System (B) Gm 2 3Q Golden State -3.5 -110 .................WINNER
Risk: 55
Win: 50
Thanks for the okc play in the hockey forum you gave me, played it