how many people it is hurting
A lot.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/03/23/5-reasons-why-on-its-5th-anniversary-obamacare-still-sucks/
The Government Accountability Office reports that insurers have left the market in droves. In 2013, 1,232 carriers offered insurance coverage in the individual market. By 2015, that number had shrunk to 310. …
Patients may also have fewer doctors to pick from. More than 60% of doctors plan to retire earlier than anticipated — by 2016 or sooner, according to Deloitte. The Physicians Foundation reported in the fall that nearly half of the 20,000 doctors who responded to their survey — especially those with more experience — considered Obamacare’s reforms a failure.
Can you make the connection between patients losing access to specialist doctors and not being able to find another in their area?
and how it is doing it fatally?
Here's one:
http://nation.foxnews.com/2014/02/10/column-obamacare-killed-my-sister
This Wednesday, my little sister, Julie, will be buried. She died because she delayed seeking health care for what turned out to be a catastrophic condition after her private health insurance policy was cancelled because of Obamacare. As she waited for a new Obamacare-approved policy to kick in, her condition deteriorated to the point that it was too late.
Here's another:
http://www.thewire.com/politics/2014/04/the-death-of-an-uninsured-florida-woman-is-the-lefts-obamacare-horror-story/360434/
An uninsured Florida woman who died last month from a treatable heart condition sparked a new kind of Obamacare horror story...
Oh well...your costs went down, so fuck them, right? If you enjoy reading these kinds of stories, I can find plenty more. But what's the point? You'll naval gaze for a while and it won't sink in. That's your pattern.
How many people were refused health coverage before because of existing conditions? All those people are insured now.
So the government forces you to buy something, and enrollment is up? Fascinating. How many of those "new enrollees" had insurance before, and how many wish they had their old plans instead of the new shit they're being fed?
Has this awesome insurance given everyone access to doctors? Isn't that the whole point behind this idiotic monstrosity?
First, there is no evidence anywhere at all, that the ACA has anything to do with your CT scan.
Second, the idea that because you have an insurance card you will get to see a doctor is laughable and preposterous.
For someone who claims to work in a hospital, you know very, very little about the topic.
what is wrong asking him that if he can afford the 225 then it is doing what it says it's going to do want to provide affordable healthcare if he can afford the 225 and maybe he can afford 100 to 150 more per month and get a really good planSo do you have a hard time paying the $225 per month?
young healthy people should subsidize health care otherwise it's going to fail. it's like paying it forward until they get old. Plus young healthy people can have catastrophic events or get sick at anytime. it would be like saying I shouldn't have to have insurance on my car when I drive cause I'm a good driver and won't get into any accidents. I think it's funny how many people who can easily afford this are bitching. do they want it to be free?This has nothing to do with "slum lording". ACA asks young, healthy people to subsidize the cost of healthcare. If I recall correctly, Seymour falls in that category. We can debate the merits of having young people subsidize healthcare costs but not the fact that it is exactly what ACA asks us to do.
what is wrong asking him that if he can afford the 225 then it is doing what it says it's going to do want to provide affordable healthcare if he can afford the 225 and maybe he can afford 100 to 150 more per month and get a really good plan
.
@)
young healthy people should subsidize health care otherwise it's going to fail. it's like paying it forward until they get old. Plus young healthy people can have catastrophic events or get sick at anytime. it would be like saying I shouldn't have to have insurance on my car when I drive cause I'm a good driver and won't get into any accidents. I think it's funny how many people who can easily afford this are bitching. do they want it to be free?
@)
young healthy people should subsidize health care otherwise it's going to fail. it's like paying it forward until they get old. Plus young healthy people can have catastrophic events or get sick at anytime. it would be like saying I shouldn't have to have insurance on my car when I drive cause I'm a good driver and won't get into any accidents. I think it's funny how many people who can easily afford this are bitching. do they want it to be free?
do you think people have the right to refuse it? if so then would you agree that health care providers should have the right to refuse to give you care? can you imagine that? a hospital checking your credit report before providing care?No, it's not like saying I shouldn't have to have insurance on my car when I drive cause I'm a good driver and won't get into any accidents.
Who said anything about free? $225 a month is actually pretty damn expensive for a "young invincible". You are in favor of young, healthy people picking up the tab for everyone else. Good for you. We can end this discussion there.
why isn't it? imagine if car insurance wasn't mandatory for car drivers? Would be a complete mess
but it has been our problem? it's been the countries problem
You are combining two issues here. We were discussing whether young healthy people paying more to subsidize the cost of healthcare is appropriate, not whether or not it should be mandatory to have insurance. Based on what we are discussing it would be more along the lines of saying I have an incident free driving record, I shouldn't have to pay more to subsidize the guy with 5 tickets and 4 accidents.