More and more, Obamacare crtics are being forced to eat crow

Search
Joined
Sep 24, 2009
Messages
2,924
Tokens
how many people it is hurting

A lot.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/03/23/5-reasons-why-on-its-5th-anniversary-obamacare-still-sucks/

The Government Accountability Office reports that insurers have left the market in droves. In 2013, 1,232 carriers offered insurance coverage in the individual market. By 2015, that number had shrunk to 310. …
Patients may also have fewer doctors to pick from. More than 60% of doctors plan to retire earlier than anticipated — by 2016 or sooner, according to Deloitte. The Physicians Foundation reported in the fall that nearly half of the 20,000 doctors who responded to their survey — especially those with more experience — considered Obamacare’s reforms a failure.

Can you make the connection between patients losing access to specialist doctors and not being able to find another in their area?

and how it is doing it fatally?

Here's one:

http://nation.foxnews.com/2014/02/10/column-obamacare-killed-my-sister

This Wednesday, my little sister, Julie, will be buried. She died because she delayed seeking health care for what turned out to be a catastrophic condition after her private health insurance policy was cancelled because of Obamacare. As she waited for a new Obamacare-approved policy to kick in, her condition deteriorated to the point that it was too late.

Here's another:

http://www.thewire.com/politics/2014/04/the-death-of-an-uninsured-florida-woman-is-the-lefts-obamacare-horror-story/360434/

An uninsured Florida woman who died last month from a treatable heart condition sparked a new kind of Obamacare horror story...

Oh well...your costs went down, so fuck them, right? If you enjoy reading these kinds of stories, I can find plenty more. But what's the point? You'll naval gaze for a while and it won't sink in. That's your pattern.


How many people were refused health coverage before because of existing conditions? All those people are insured now.

So the government forces you to buy something, and enrollment is up? Fascinating. How many of those "new enrollees" had insurance before, and how many wish they had their old plans instead of the new shit they're being fed?

Has this awesome insurance given everyone access to doctors? Isn't that the whole point behind this idiotic monstrosity?

not saying there haven't been glitches, I'll look up those stories later, can't pull them up on my iPhone, like I said there are some who
it had negatively affected. I say yes don't make it mandatory but if you don't have insurance and can't afford to pay then
you get no treatment. people would change their tune. people are
idiots complaining about paying $300 a month for an individual plan to have piece of mind / healthcare
 
Joined
Sep 24, 2009
Messages
2,924
Tokens
First, there is no evidence anywhere at all, that the ACA has anything to do with your CT scan.

Second, the idea that because you have an insurance card you will get to see a doctor is laughable and preposterous.

For someone who claims to work in a hospital, you know very, very little about the topic.

i do not work in hospital anymore, but trust me in Minnesota everyone gets seen, maybe other places they don't but minnesota kicks ass
remember
 
Joined
Sep 24, 2009
Messages
2,924
Tokens
So do you have a hard time paying the $225 per month?
what is wrong asking him that if he can afford the 225 then it is doing what it says it's going to do want to provide affordable healthcare if he can afford the 225 and maybe he can afford 100 to 150 more per month and get a really good plan
.
 
Joined
Sep 24, 2009
Messages
2,924
Tokens
@)
This has nothing to do with "slum lording". ACA asks young, healthy people to subsidize the cost of healthcare. If I recall correctly, Seymour falls in that category. We can debate the merits of having young people subsidize healthcare costs but not the fact that it is exactly what ACA asks us to do.
young healthy people should subsidize health care otherwise it's going to fail. it's like paying it forward until they get old. Plus young healthy people can have catastrophic events or get sick at anytime. it would be like saying I shouldn't have to have insurance on my car when I drive cause I'm a good driver and won't get into any accidents. I think it's funny how many people who can easily afford this are bitching. do they want it to be free?
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2012
Messages
6,748
Tokens
what is wrong asking him that if he can afford the 225 then it is doing what it says it's going to do want to provide affordable healthcare if he can afford the 225 and maybe he can afford 100 to 150 more per month and get a really good plan
.

@)
young healthy people should subsidize health care otherwise it's going to fail. it's like paying it forward until they get old. Plus young healthy people can have catastrophic events or get sick at anytime. it would be like saying I shouldn't have to have insurance on my car when I drive cause I'm a good driver and won't get into any accidents. I think it's funny how many people who can easily afford this are bitching. do they want it to be free?

No, it's not like saying I shouldn't have to have insurance on my car when I drive cause I'm a good driver and won't get into any accidents.

Who said anything about free? $225 a month is actually pretty damn expensive for a "young invincible". You are in favor of young, healthy people picking up the tab for everyone else. Good for you. We can end this discussion there.
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,411
Tokens
@)
young healthy people should subsidize health care otherwise it's going to fail. it's like paying it forward until they get old. Plus young healthy people can have catastrophic events or get sick at anytime. it would be like saying I shouldn't have to have insurance on my car when I drive cause I'm a good driver and won't get into any accidents. I think it's funny how many people who can easily afford this are bitching. do they want it to be free?

They want it to be voluntary and government to fuck off.
 
Joined
Sep 24, 2009
Messages
2,924
Tokens
No, it's not like saying I shouldn't have to have insurance on my car when I drive cause I'm a good driver and won't get into any accidents.

Who said anything about free? $225 a month is actually pretty damn expensive for a "young invincible". You are in favor of young, healthy people picking up the tab for everyone else. Good for you. We can end this discussion there.
do you think people have the right to refuse it? if so then would you agree that health care providers should have the right to refuse to give you care? can you imagine that? a hospital checking your credit report before providing care?
 
Joined
Sep 24, 2009
Messages
2,924
Tokens
saying what all I have said and what everyone else has said it's still a
work in progress, I truly believe if we had close to 100 % participation it would
be a success. lots of gloom and doomers out there. The right wing base has done very little and has resorted to nothing but scare tactics and gloom. let the people decide. Remember when Palin and the Faux crew were talking about Obama's death panels? laughable
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,411
Tokens
BlBxWNZCcAA7KRa.jpg
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2012
Messages
6,748
Tokens
why isn't it? imagine if car insurance wasn't mandatory for car drivers? Would be a complete mess

You are combining two issues here. We were discussing whether young healthy people paying more to subsidize the cost of healthcare is appropriate, not whether or not it should be mandatory to have insurance. Based on what we are discussing it would be more along the lines of saying I have an incident free driving record, I shouldn't have to pay more to subsidize the guy with 5 tickets and 4 accidents.
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,411
Tokens
but it has been our problem? it's been the countries problem

It became our problem because progressives decided to intervene and make laws which force a third party payer to bear the economic consequences of an individual's poor decision making. Insurance only became necessary once healthcare costs spiralled out of control.

If there's one thing people should take away from this horrible social experiment of government intervention in medicine over the last few decades it is this: moral hazard is the cause of medical price hyperinflation.

To reverse medical price hyperinflation requires the elimination of the moral hazard. Either everyone has to pay for the care they choose (or not choose - in the case of irresponsible people who refuse to buy insurance and then get sick or have an accident, like your friend), or insurance companies or the government will have to make medical decisions on the behalf on their behalf ("death panels").

Nothing else will work.

I realize the concept of everyone paying for their own healthcare (except catastrophic coverage) sounds horrifying and inconceivable, but again, if everyone pays for themselves, then the moral hazard goes away and prices will fall as fast as prices of computers.

In these modern times, going to get medical treatment for most illnesses and accidents should be as easy as walking into a Walmart or Costco clinic and paying $40-50 cash to be treated.

That's how free market healthcare used to work...until progressives screwed up an entire industry with one dysfunctional government mandate piled on top of another. Obamacare being the latest clusterfuck.
 
Joined
Sep 24, 2009
Messages
2,924
Tokens
You are combining two issues here. We were discussing whether young healthy people paying more to subsidize the cost of healthcare is appropriate, not whether or not it should be mandatory to have insurance. Based on what we are discussing it would be more along the lines of saying I have an incident free driving record, I shouldn't have to pay more to subsidize the guy with 5 tickets and 4 accidents.

I understand what you are saying but that doesn't happen with car insurance,if car insurance wasn't mandatory you can surely bet we would be, the insured premiums would be higher. imagine if let's say 1/3 of those insured decided to say screw it, I'm not paying auto insurance, we wouldn't be subsidizing them but we would have to pay more.

health insurance is different cause everyone will use it, not everyone drives. plus we have children involved and elderly who suck up a lot of costs. without the young healthy person's money health care would cave
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,877
Messages
13,574,567
Members
100,879
Latest member
am_sports
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com