The Republican party has been redistributing $$$$ towards the rich for a long time with NO trickle down effect at all, just look at our economy now. What have the current tax cuts (for the wealthy )done for the economy the last 8 years?? ...It's a shame not everyone understands what Obamas plan will actually do for the entire economy as a whole and for the long haul...Learn the FACTS and not what the clowns on fox just say ...AMERICA is now owned by foreign countries thx to the Bush administration........
Dude, put the crack pipe down and walk away slowly. lmao, since when did the Bush administration have anything to do with the this country. His administration has had to do with his and Cheney's oil buddys making money and that is it. Nothing more and nothing less. This 'war' was contrived so all of his oil buddies could reposition themselves in Iraq and for Haliburton to show rediculous profits. The collapse of the housing and financial markets has do with people on both sides of the aisle signing bullshit legislation into play ever since the Clinton administration and then the greed of a-holes in the larger financial institutions who have walked away with millions in their own personal pockets with no repercussions whatsoever. Obama's voting record is as far left as it gets and the only reason he has moved towards the center is to rty and garner votes, primarily white votes as he already has the vast majority of the black vote. If he becomes president he will, most likely, move to the far left once again as very few people ever change that drastically over the course of a few months and remain that way. Russia is in the midst of rearming themselves to become a world player from a military standpoit with Iran on the verge of becoming a nuclear nation. If Obama has the balls to standup to the countries I would be in shock. Notice I did not say negotiate, I said stand up to. Tax rebates have already proven they do not work with the latest ones not doing shit for the economy, which is essentially what he is proposing to do with his redistribution of wealth. The markets will recover with or wothout this redistribution and regardless who is President.
hno:
You hit the nail on the proverbial head buddy!! Read your first several sentences, while Bush was f-ing off he neglected his presidential duty in running the country.
155mph, you are so right. What has George Bush done for us????
If the election was not rigged in the state of florida, George Bush would never have been appointed, because he sure was not elected.
And to Vic Vega 91 you are a MO----and I even know your last name.
It's RON LMFAO AT U VIC
You hit the nail on the proverbial head buddy!! Read your first several sentences, while Bush was f-ing off he neglected his presidential duty in running the country.
That has nothing nothing to do with either republicans or Democrats merely about money. Ole Georgie boy took this country for a ride. But the financial woes of this country lay squarely on both sides of the aisle.
Hey a-hole or should I say pick-my-ass-pete, I can not even say your name here as it would probably get me banned but suffice to say that you obviously are an ignorant individual that most likely thinks that Nancy Pelosi is hot. Of course she would probably be a far step above the skanks that you most likely associate with
hno:. When you finally graduate from Elementary school please do the rest of your community a favor a ship yourself to another country
uke1:
And please do not ever try and be successful and make somthing of yourself so Obama can rape you in taxes so that you can share with the people who are 'disadvantaged'
if ur right why would the worlds richest man be backing OBAMA????????
http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5iEoh4tPLHPMMok875VIJDcq3FOKg
Makes you think what kind of special considerations some of the wealthy Obama contributors will be getting. Just like every other politician through the course of time has done. Why would they contribute to his campaign if they were not getting something from it. All of the people I have known who were from substantial money (no one as rich as Buffet but certainly millionaires in their own right) always had a motive behind what they did. Even if on the surface that it may have appeared altruistic, making more money in the long run was ultimately the driving force. So what will these wealthy campaign contributors for Obama receive and how will Obama compensate them if he is elected is a very good question. I am glad that you brought it to light.
If elected will Obama follow in the path of so many other great Chicago politicians who were the absolute masters at ensuring that their major contributors were taken care of from a fiduciary standpoint and that their enemys were slowly but surely eliminated? Interesting questions to say the least:think2:
Are you kidding?? Warren Buffet needs to have a motive to vote for better policies that will benefit everyone in the long run?? :lol:Buffet understands that keeping the middle class restricted will cause the entire economy to continue in a downward spiral...Everybody would eventually feel the pain including the wealthy...OH I'm sorry, that's what's happening NOW... Who do you think keeps GDP up?
