jack burnet
<TABLE style="WIDTH: 315pt; mso-cellspacing: 0in; mso-padding-alt: 0in 0in 0in 0in" cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=420 border=0><TBODY><TR style="HEIGHT: 22.5pt"><TD style="BORDER-RIGHT: #ece9d8; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #ece9d8; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; BORDER-LEFT: #ece9d8; WIDTH: 315pt; PADDING-TOP: 0in; BORDER-BOTTOM: #ece9d8; HEIGHT: 22.5pt; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" width=420>30,000 DIME MONDAY NIGHT SPECIAL RELEASE<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com<office
></o
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<TABLE style="WIDTH: 315pt; mso-cellspacing: 0in; mso-padding-alt: 0in 0in 0in 0in" cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=420 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="BORDER-RIGHT: #ece9d8; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #ece9d8; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; BORDER-LEFT: #ece9d8; WIDTH: 315pt; PADDING-TOP: 0in; BORDER-BOTTOM: #ece9d8; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" vAlign=top width=420>
30,000 Dime - Green Bay +4.5 over Minnesota
Minnesota should have lost to San Francisco last week, plain and simple. The Vikings are 3-0 but not impressive to me. Who cares about Favre and this whole storyline, it's all bullshit. Kick the ball and play the game. Let's talk defense. Dom Capers is now the new defensive coordinator and his 3-4 scheme has made a difference in Green Bay.
After three games, the Packers are allowing less than 4 yards per rush and facing Adrian Peterson, who gashed them for 192 and 103 yards in the two meetings a season ago, will be the real test tonight.
The Packers are 4-0 ATS in their last four meetings and 5-1 ATS in their last six games in Minnesota. The underdog is 16-5 ATS in their last 21 meetings and the road team is 11-3 ATS in the last 14 matchups. I'm not impressed with Minnesota and this should be a filed goal game either way. Expect the Packers to win this one.<o</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
CONFIRMED-----------------GL GUYS
thanks cork/
fade the old ones
ness,mcmordie,stryker,lang,doc sports,many many more.bring in the new ones, ones that know the new ways to beat the books.the new kids is whats getting it done today not the old ones that play game of year everyday.:toast:
"rob crowne" from pregame
i am banned from there since i expressed my displeasure about one of there cappers gom's which lost...
Funny thing is over there you can buy there picks, but when u lose and lose over and over again you cant vent...
Maybe if i stop payments on over $500 in the past month of charges maybe they will allow me to express..
anyway "rob crowne has a huge play tonite
i am banned from there since i expressed my displeasure about one of there cappers gom's which lost...
Funny thing is over there you can buy there picks, but when u lose and lose over and over again you cant vent...
Maybe if i stop payments on over $500 in the past month of charges maybe they will allow me to express..
anyway "rob crowne has a huge play tonite
Prove it Steve Jabby, Uma Shanker and Tommy Nyguyen
Steve Jabby is claiming a record of 28-6 on 'Breaking Info Plays' and 18-7 on "1000 Dime Plays'. combined that is 46-13.
Uma Shanker is claiming a record of 28-11 on '5 Gold Star Plays'.
Tommy Nyguyen is claiming a record of 22-5 on '200,000 Dime Plays'
For KrunchTimePicks (KTP) That is a total of 96-29 for 77%.
Not just one better than very good record, but three of them. Maybe there are three to make it look like it is not that difficult to achieve such records.
If these records are real you would think that KTP would take every measure to prove them. Some handicappers are willing to prove their records by having their plays monitored by services that make known the plays (and the lines at time of release) shortly after the games start. Some handicappers do this at their own web site and some do both. They are willing to have their records proven.
If you are good, and honest, why wouldn't you want to have your record proven? You would be able to establish yourself as being at the top of an industry that is full of scam artists. Based on the number of services in the industry the market must be significant and you would gain market share by distinguishing yourself. If you are not good, and honest, it is obvious as to why you would not want to have your real record proven.
It is also strange that none of these alleged good handicappers at KTP have taken it upon themselves to have their records proven. Not one of them. Even though they have the opportunity to distinguish themselves among the competition at KTP and from other handicappers. It only makes sense that if you can prove your good record and you are competing against others that are not, you have a competitive advantage, and are going to attract more customers. These principles apply also to KTP competing against other services. I guess that these handicappers would like you to believe that they can analyze a game but cannot analyze the marketplace.
If any service tells you that their posted record has to be legitimate because their customers see their posted record that is a joke. That is unless the customer or combination of customers buy ALL of the plays and make a public post of every game shortly after it starts. It also means nothing if a service tells you that they post what the play is the following day. And if they tell you what game they have a play in all they have to do is tell you they had the winner the next day.
BEWARE OF SERVICES THAT DO NOT PROVE THEIR RECORD. IT IS EASY FOR THEM TO PROVE THEIR RECORD AND IF THEY DO NOT, THEN BEWARE.
Steve Jabby is claiming a record of 28-6 on 'Breaking Info Plays' and 18-7 on "1000 Dime Plays'. combined that is 46-13.
Uma Shanker is claiming a record of 28-11 on '5 Gold Star Plays'.
Tommy Nyguyen is claiming a record of 22-5 on '200,000 Dime Plays'
For KrunchTimePicks (KTP) That is a total of 96-29 for 77%.
Not just one better than very good record, but three of them. Maybe there are three to make it look like it is not that difficult to achieve such records.
If these records are real you would think that KTP would take every measure to prove them. Some handicappers are willing to prove their records by having their plays monitored by services that make known the plays (and the lines at time of release) shortly after the games start. Some handicappers do this at their own web site and some do both. They are willing to have their records proven.
If you are good, and honest, why wouldn't you want to have your record proven? You would be able to establish yourself as being at the top of an industry that is full of scam artists. Based on the number of services in the industry the market must be significant and you would gain market share by distinguishing yourself. If you are not good, and honest, it is obvious as to why you would not want to have your real record proven.
It is also strange that none of these alleged good handicappers at KTP have taken it upon themselves to have their records proven. Not one of them. Even though they have the opportunity to distinguish themselves among the competition at KTP and from other handicappers. It only makes sense that if you can prove your good record and you are competing against others that are not, you have a competitive advantage, and are going to attract more customers. These principles apply also to KTP competing against other services. I guess that these handicappers would like you to believe that they can analyze a game but cannot analyze the marketplace.
If any service tells you that their posted record has to be legitimate because their customers see their posted record that is a joke. That is unless the customer or combination of customers buy ALL of the plays and make a public post of every game shortly after it starts. It also means nothing if a service tells you that they post what the play is the following day. And if they tell you what game they have a play in all they have to do is tell you they had the winner the next day.
BEWARE OF SERVICES THAT DO NOT PROVE THEIR RECORD. IT IS EASY FOR THEM TO PROVE THEIR RECORD AND IF THEY DO NOT, THEN BEWARE.
Hey CPAW,First of all let me say that you are one of the guys in this industry that I respect the most. I apologize for coming here and airing this out but I thought I would let everyone know why BRADY pays so much attention to me and my selections.
BRADY approached me quite a while ago under a different alias about a handicapper opportunity on my website. After talking to BRADY for a period of time I decided to give him a try as a "Featured Handicapper" on my website. After failing miserably with a horrible win/loss ratio I removed BRADY from the site and picked up another featured handicapper. After the fact, I found out this person was actually BRADY from therx forum and not a real handicapper. That explains why he was so bad. Ever since then, BRADY has a serious hard on for me and whenever I have a bad losing day he feels the need to point it out to everyone.
Well that's fine with me. Every game I release is posted on my website under the respective sport and it never comes down until the end of the season. NBA and NCAAB are all still up on my site. I keep very accurate records of wins/losses and units won/loss. He is pulling the records right from my site. I have nothing to hide. It's been a rough start to football season for me but I know I will turn it around. I am the same guy who finished #1 in NFL and #2 in NCAAF last year at the Free Sports Monitor. So BRADY doesn't need to point out my flaws, they are all listed right on my site for everyone to see! BRADY obviously has some bitterness towards me specifically because he couldn't cut it and I found it his scam. If that wasn't the real reason, then why don't you give any other handicapper the attention you give me? I have nothing to hidel CPAW can vouch that I'm one of the most honest guys out here.
CPAW I am sorry again but had to clear the air here.
there are a lot of cappers out there with records that are much worse...some of these guys want perfection and don't understand that wagering is a marathon and not a sprint....appreciate the post...i never heard of Brady but guys that try to put others down to build themselves do not deserve respect and generally don't get respect
