MLS expansion news

Search

New member
Joined
Aug 20, 2003
Messages
1,946
Tokens
I guess big oil money talks. He's willing to pay more than double the previous expansion fee and pay for a new stadium.

Other cities in the mix are Orlando, Miami and Atlanta. This looks like a done deal, however.



Sheik Said to Pursue Soccer Franchise for Queens

By JERÉ LONGMAN and KEN BELSON
Published: April 28, 2013

 
The Russian entrepreneur Mikhail D. Prokhorov owns the Nets basketball team. Red Bull, the Austrian-based energy drink company, owns the Red Bulls soccer team. Now a member of the royal family of Abu Dhabi is poised to become the latest foreign owner of a New York-area professional sports franchise.

Sheik Mansour bin Zayed al-Nahyan, a member of the Abu Dhabi royal family, whose private investment group owns Manchester City in England’s Premier League, has entered final negotiations to purchase a franchise of Major League Soccer to be situated in Queens, according to two people with knowledge of the negotiations.

The prospective owners are willing to pay a $100 million expansion fee for the league’s 20th team, which could be called New York City F.C. and begin play in 2016, the two people said. That would more than double the expansion fee of $40 million paid by the Montreal team that entered M.L.S. in 2012.

After months of public hearings, applications and discussions, a deal for a privately financed $340 million stadium in Flushing Meadows-Corona Park, which would hold 25,000 spectators and could be expanded to 35,000, could be completed in several weeks, according to several people with knowledge of the deal.

The league wants to make the announcement before May 25, when Manchester City is scheduled to play an exhibition at Yankee Stadium against its English rival Chelsea, the two people familiar with the negotiations said.

Neither Don Garber, the commissioner of M.L.S., nor Sheik Mansour could be reached for comment Sunday. Last week, Garber told reporters he hoped to make an announcement about the expansion team in New York in four to six weeks. In addition, Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg told reporters last week, "Hopefully, we’re getting close to announcing a new soccer stadium here in Flushing Meadow Park."

While foreign ownership of professional teams is relatively limited in the United States, it is rarer still for those owners to be of Arab descent. But the influence of oil and gas money in the Middle East has spread in international soccer in recent years.

In 2008, Sheik Mansour bought Manchester City for $330 million. Last year, Qatar Sports Investments, a branch of the emirate’s sovereign wealth fund, completed its buyout of Paris St.-Germain in the French league, valuing the club at $130 million.

Qatar also won a contentious vote to host the 2022 World Cup. And beIN Sport, a subsidiary of Al Jazeera, the Qatar-based television network, now televises soccer matches in the United States, some featuring the American national team, others showcasing top leagues in Spain, England, Italy and France.

For M.L.S., an affiliation with the Abu Dhabi royal family and the owners of Manchester City would broaden the global footprint of the sport in the United States. And the association with wealthy owners willing to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on their team would provide another vote of confidence in soccer’s potential in America, sports industry experts said. Owning a team in New York could also provide a springboard for other opportunities, including potential real estate investments.

In 2012, M.L.S. had a higher average attendance than the N.B.A. and the N.H.L. A recent global survey named it the seventh-best soccer league in the world.

"If England has the world’s biggest soccer league, then America has the most up and coming league," said Steve Horowitz, a partner at Inner Circle Sports, an investment bank that has put together soccer deals, including one last year on behalf of Erick Thohir, an Indonesian media magnate who bought a controlling stake in D.C. United.

Sheik Mansour, who is in his early 40s, was listed in 2009 by Forbes as its newest Gulf billionaire, with a personal fortune of $4.9 billion and a collective family fortune estimated at $150 billion.

Abu Dhabi, a part of the United Arab Emirates, holds 9 percent of the world’s oil reserves, and Sheik Mansour is chairman of its International Petroleum Investment Company, part of what Forbes estimated as a $650 billion sovereign wealth fund.

Buying a soccer club allows the establishment of business and political connections and provides good public relations in enhancing Abu Dhabi’s global business empire, said Stefan Szymanski, a professor of sports management at the University of Michigan and a co-author of the book "Soccernomics."

"These are long-term investors, the Warren Buffetts of the Middle East," Szymanski said. "It almost doesn’t matter what plays inside the stadium. It’s the location, the city, that indicates it’s a good investment."

A salary cap in M.L.S. would prohibit Sheik Mansour from spending hundreds of millions of dollars to sign players, as he has done with Manchester City, which in 2012 won its first Premier League title in 44 years and is now valued by Forbes at $689 million, the fourth richest in England and an increase of 56 percent from last year.

A New York franchise could help develop young players for Manchester City, Szymanski said, while Sheik Mansour positions himself in the event M.L.S. takes off in terms of attracting a wider television audience, offering larger salaries and becoming more appealing to soccer fans in the United States who now prefer the international game.

Buying into M.L.S., Szymanski said, may also be a subtle signal by Sheik Mansour that he has other alternatives if he begins to feel impinged by a European soccer initiative called Financial Fair Play. This is an attempt to curb runaway deficit spending and restrict teams to income generated from broadcast rights, ticket sales, corporate sponsorships, merchandising and competition prize money. A person familiar with the M.L.S. negotiations said the league would have been more wary of Arab ownership if a New York team were being bought by the Qatari royal family, which has shown support for Hamas, a Palestinian group that Israel and the United States consider a terrorist organization.

Referring to the Qatari ownership of Paris St.-Germain, the person familiar with the Abu Dhabi negotiations said, "That would have been a much larger challenge."

Several experts said they would not expect much political blowback from an Abu Dhabi ownership in New York.

"These people have a huge interest in political stability," Szymanski said. "Jihad would be the furthest thing from these people’s minds."

Still, legislative hurdles remain, even with the ownership group proposing to spend hundreds of millions of its own money instead of asking the city for hundreds of millions in subsidies. The City Council, no doubt aware that some community groups have opposed the project because of the loss of park space, must approve the land use plans for the stadium. The State Legislature also must approve plans to replace the 10 to 13 acres of parkland that would be set aside for the stadium. M.L.S. and representatives of Sheik Mansour are also in discussions with the Mets about using the parking lot at Citi Field on game days.

The city said it was in "active discussions" with M.L.S. But pending a final deal, the Parks Department is spending $2 million to install two new soccer fields and make other repairs to the land where the proposed stadium would sit.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/29/sports/soccer/abu-dhabi-sheik-is-said-to-be-on-track-to-own-new-soccer-team-in-new-york.html?_r=0
 

"i had a hundy but i bet a grand"
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
8,199
Tokens
If I might add, expect an announcement right around Memorial Day weekend...my brother,who works for the sheiks and city's accounting team was part of the contingent that were over here this past week....this won't be city's feeder club in the least, thats arsenal...:):) but expect to see many academy players get some run w/the future nycfc...cheers
 

I'm from the government and I'm here to help
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,501
Tokens
yeah NYFC will get a club and put it over by where the Mets play. the second club will, IMO, either be Orlando City or St Louis. Neither Miami nor Atlanta have much of a chance...I'd prefer STL but with Orlando ready to build a new crib that will probably give them the advantage plus their USL team draws fairly well. If the City of Orlando shoots down the stadium I'd expect STL is next in line

update on orlando stadium at http://articles.orlandosentinel.com...o-city-soccer-club-soccer-stadium-soccer-team
 

I'm from the government and I'm here to help
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,501
Tokens
If I might add, expect an announcement right around Memorial Day weekend...my brother,who works for the sheiks and city's accounting team was part of the contingent that were over here this past week....this won't be city's feeder club in the least, thats arsenal...:):) but expect to see many academy players get some run w/the future nycfc...cheers

they're the feeder club for City, United, Juventus, and Barcelona. If Chelsea win the Uefa Cup and City the FA cup that will push the total trophies held by guys that left Gunners in last 8 years to 70, i think. I believe the only big name that didn't win one was Gallas at Spurs. impressive
 

"i had a hundy but i bet a grand"
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
8,199
Tokens
they're the feeder club for City, United, Juventus, and Barcelona. If Chelsea win the Uefa Cup and City the FA cup that will push the total trophies held by guys that left Gunners in last 8 years to 70, i think. I believe the only big name that didn't win one was Gallas at Spurs. impressive
That's so wrong and funny in the same breath...will they find a way out of the top 4 is my only question left on the season
 

New member
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
141
Tokens
Got half an hour before Portland game, so:
Those rich owners, who just buy their way into everything, are never a good thing imo. I've seen too many already, and all they can do is to solve their let's call it "politic" interest, while trophies come at enormous price. And all they do is chasing trophies, while players/managers/staff change every other day and that's the biggest problem. From what I remember Abramovich with Chelsea was probably the first guy to start it (I mean foreign billionaires). How much money was wasted (probably lost) before they got Champions League. How many coaches and players left in the process. Other than Terry, Cole, Drogba, Cech, Lampard 50% of team are new faces every season. And when coaches were changing every second, even these iconic players suffered, because they were not getting playing time. Add to this deals like they made for Torres. I personally never thought of him bad as a player, but financial side of that is what's scary. They bought him for so much money, that they couldn't even sell him. And during all that time of his poor form, they forced him into rotation, putting him on other roles/positions and taking playing time from Drogba etc.
So this behavior is the worst about owners like these to me. Why do you need them in developing league with so many restrictions. They will just buy what's not under restrictions (like coaches salary or something). There are great potential and some problems, but I guess comissioner looking the other way. NY just got to have 2 teams in every major sport...
 

"i had a hundy but i bet a grand"
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
8,199
Tokens
Got half an hour before Portland game, so:
Those rich owners, who just buy their way into everything, are never a good thing imo. I've seen too many already, and all they can do is to solve their let's call it "politic" interest, while trophies come at enormous price. And all they do is chasing trophies, while players/managers/staff change every other day and that's the biggest problem. From what I remember Abramovich with Chelsea was probably the first guy to start it (I mean foreign billionaires). How much money was wasted (probably lost) before they got Champions League. How many coaches and players left in the process. Other than Terry, Cole, Drogba, Cech, Lampard 50% of team are new faces every season. And when coaches were changing every second, even these iconic players suffered, because they were not getting playing time. Add to this deals like they made for Torres. I personally never thought of him bad as a player, but financial side of that is what's scary. They bought him for so much money, that they couldn't even sell him. And during all that time of his poor form, they forced him into rotation, putting him on other roles/positions and taking playing time from Drogba etc.
So this behavior is the worst about owners like these to me. Why do you need them in developing league with so many restrictions. They will just buy what's not under restrictions (like coaches salary or something). There are great potential and some problems, but I guess comissioner looking the other way. NY just got to have 2 teams in every major sport...

i don't disagree w/some of what u write...though, would you happen to live in or near one of the cities not getting a new squad?
 

New member
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
141
Tokens
i don't disagree w/some of what u write...though, would you happen to live in or near one of the cities not getting a new squad?
No, I'm on the other side of ocean :) Who knows, maybe in 2016 situation will be completely different and rules will be changed. And those rich owners will be needed to bring some stars in their prime and help league make next step. But what they've done in Europe clearly shows, that they force leagues and assosiations change rules, because their interests and opportunities are opposite. This is where local (American/Candian) owners have an advantage, because they have example of other major leagues, where many owners (with different financial opportunities) behave as one and try to make everyone happy by sharing revenue,sponsor deals e.t.c. Which in the end makes league and competetive balance better. And MLS is built on other major league principles like salary cap. And same Sheiks force whole Europe to have not exactly salary cap, but balance cap. So I might not be interested part, but I would like to see cities with teams in place (like Orlando) and great support from locals also be included, and not left out. Especially when you have NFL owner interested (Atlanta) e.t.c. Owning MLS team is nowhere near the price of owning NBA or MLB team (last sales are 0.5 billion +), so I think there should be many interested local owners or rich guys. And the key for me is that they'll be looking to earn money and make things better, not spend them to gain respect or whatever sheiks are after.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 20, 2003
Messages
1,946
Tokens
It looks like Orlando, or any other city in Florida is out for now.


 
 
With stadium bill shot down, Orlando MLS expansion bid suffers major setback

Orlando’s ongoing plans for a Major League Soccer expansion franchise took a major hit on Friday, when the Florida House of Representatives killed a bill that would have provided funding support for the a proposed MLS stadium in downtown Orlando.

The bill also killed the funding for renovations to Miami’s Sun Life Stadium, widely considered the home to an MLS franchise if the league someday ventures back into South Florida.

"We are bitterly disappointed that House Bill #7127 reached in impasse in the HOR today," the Orlando City Soccer Club tweeted out Friday night. "We will continue to work to bring MLS to Orlando."

Orlando Mayor Buddy Dyer, who has been one of the biggest proponents of bringing MLS to central Florida, blamed House Speaker Will Weatherford for killing the bill, but Weatherford defended the move in the Orlando Sentinel.

"I don't think anybody was blocking the stadium from coming through," Weatherford told the Sentinel. "I think that at the end of the day some bills pass and some bills die."

Weatherford told the Sentinel that the complication was that there were multiple professional teams looking for a tax break with the bill.

Orlando City SC owner Phil Rawlins took to Twitter with his discontent over the decision, tweeting "bitterly disappointed with the politics I just witnessed in Tallahassee. On to the next step!"

http://www.mlssoccer.com/news/article/2013/05/04/stadium-bill-shot-down-orlando-mls-expansion-bid-suffers-major-setback
 

I'm from the government and I'm here to help
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,501
Tokens
time for STL to step up. They can start in busch stadium until Kroenke's new 20k seat soccer stadium is ready....Kroenke owns arsenal, rapids, and rams...would also serve as a major college tourney stadium given SLU's importance and history in college soccer and would give a nice midwest regional rivalry with Sporting KC, Chicago, and to a lesser extent Columbus. do it!
 

New member
Joined
Aug 20, 2003
Messages
1,946
Tokens
You make some good points, rolltide.

I like the idea of soccer only stadiums in the 20-25k range. Seeing DC United play this last Wed. in an empty RFK stadium was pretty bad. It looked like there were 2-3k people.

When Miami had a team, did they play their games at Joe Robbie stadium where the Dolphins play? I wasn't really following MLS that closely back then.


The MLS needs another strong eastern club. Any team they add in the east, will send Houston back into an already strong western conference. So it makes sense for the league to give the Sheik a team in NYC. He has deep pockets, and will definately spend money and have 2-3 qaulity designated players at all times.

Do you know if there is a cap limit for the designated players? Or can a team go way over the cap and sign three DP's for say $15 mil. each?
 

New member
Joined
Nov 17, 2008
Messages
1,040
Tokens
you guys in the USA can have toronto fc if you want...what a disgrace of a franchise.
 

I'm from the government and I'm here to help
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,501
Tokens
you guys in the USA can have toronto fc if you want...what a disgrace of a franchise.

no thx...i think the mls should trade them to the canadian soccer league for a few toonies
 

I'm from the government and I'm here to help
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,501
Tokens
When Miami had a team, did they play their games at Joe Robbie stadium where the Dolphins play? I wasn't really following MLS that closely back then.



Do you know if there is a cap limit for the designated players? Or can a team go way over the cap and sign three DP's for say $15 mil. each?

The Fusion played at Lockhart...same joint the Ft Lauderdale NASL play in now...basically a glorified high school stadium

DP's can make whatever the team wants to pay them. It's less of a salary cap hit to sign a young DP vs an old DP but they only get charged a small percentage against the cap. I think Henry makes like $4.5M but only 350k gets charged against the cap. for young DP's it's 200k instead of 350k
 

New member
Joined
Nov 17, 2008
Messages
1,040
Tokens
no thx...i think the mls should trade them to the canadian soccer league for a few toonies

if you have a centerman that can win faceoffs we will trade TFC for that player for the leafs.
 

I'm from the government and I'm here to help
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,501
Tokens
SI.com’s Grant Wahl has the latest report on the matter and it is what you might expect for the post-retirement MLS ownership phase of Beckham’s career that is going to get underway here shortly.
Now that David Beckham has retired from playing, he may be looking to exercise his option to become an MLS owner sooner than later. Beckham has said he plans on becoming an MLS owner, and MLS vice-president Dan Courtemanche tells me his advisers have already discussed moving forward with the MLS. The contract specifies that Beckham would own an expansion team, not an existing team, and his expansion fee would be $25 million, below the $40 million fee that Montreal paid last year. The more people I talk to, the more I’m hearing that Miami is the city Beckham is most interested in right now.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,415
Tokens
May 2111:00AM EDT [h=1]Man City, N.Y. Yankees team up to own 20th MLS club[/h]Posted by Roger Bennett

soc_g_mansour-steinbrenner01jr_576.jpg
AP PhotosManchester City and the New York Yankees entered into a $100 million deal to own New York City Football Club (NYCFC), the 20th franchise in Major League Soccer (MLS.)
In ground-breaking news that fuses two global sports brands and continues the ongoing growth of soccer in the United States, a $100M deal was announced this morning that partners Manchester City, the English Premier League's 2011-12 Champions, with the New York Yankees, Major League Baseball powerhouse, as owners of New York City Football Club (NYCFC), the 20th franchise in Major League Soccer (MLS.)

The club expects to begin playing in 2015.

MLS commissioner Don Garber called the moment a "transformational one for soccer in America," claiming: "The fact that we have a Premier League champion and a 27-time World Series Champion will give the league the credibility around the world that the signing of David Beckham did."

While Manchester City's interest in acquiring a MLS team has long been rumored, the minority ownership position taken by Yankees has come as a surprise. According to Yankees president Randy Levine, the relationship was forged through their concessions and marketing company, Legends Management, which operates at the Etihad. "We are the New York Yankees, we require special people to partner with and we learned that Manchester City are just that."

The Yankees expect to be active participants in operations. As Levine explained, "from The Boss George Steinbrenner on down, we have been big soccer fans in this organization." Though the baseball team had a joint marketing agreement with Manchester United as recently as 2009, it is City they will formally partner with. "They know how to run a soccer club, we know our way around New York it is a win-win."

Manchester City will be the new club's majority owners. Their position has been taken up by the club itself, not Abu Dhabi owner Sheik Mansour as had been widely reported. It stands as a powerful indicator that in the ongoing football arms race, the thirst for unconventional revenue streams and creative brand exposure will compel major teams to execute ever bolder global strategies.

The deal began when Manchester City's CEO Ferran Soriano was back at Barcelona eight years ago. Soriano is now City's CEO and explained the synergies. "We are here to develop a fantastic football product which will use our strength, knowledge and extended scouting network all over the world." He added: "Obviously there is the commercial opportunity for New York City FC and Manchester City and we have great players in our academies... it is only natural some of these players might be playing in New York."

For MLS, the partnership with two global giants will broaden the league's global profile in its 18th year. Commissioner Don Garber was effusive. "This market has 19 million people in the region and is soccer hungry. With the Red Bulls here, we have the opportunity for a rival -- a derby, if you will -- that will break through the clutter of sports teams in this market and will work on the local, national and global levels."

That the announcement was made during Manchester City's post-season American tour was not coincidental. Further announcements are expected, including a lucrative new jersey deal with Nike, before the club take on Chelsea in two exhibition games. The first is a sold-out affair in St. Louis on Thursday night; the second, symbolically, on Saturday afternoon at Yankee Stadium.

New York City FC expect to play in an interim home until a permanent stadium is built. The owners are committed to constructing a stadium and will take up negotiations with the city. Whether their focus now shifts from the 13-acre plot of the Flushing Meadows-Corona Park in Queens remains to be seen. Ferran Soriano explained: "We are very aware of the Queens negotiation. This is not about finding a stadium. This is about finding a home that will be successful from a commercial, and soccer perspective as well as a community perspective."
 

I'm from the government and I'm here to help
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,501
Tokens
Things are moving forward however now in Orlando as the group has put together a new plan to help fund their stadium.Reports from the Scoring Third this morning suggest that the stadium project will now cost slightly less than what the group had originally estimated.
Again, though not official, the new total for stadium construction/land costs is rumored to be $95M; down from previous estimates of $105M-$110M. Additionally, the cost breakdown would see an adjustment to the team’s contribution as follows:
$50M - Cash from Orlando City Soccer Club
$20M – Land/Cash from City of Orlando
$25M – Cash from Hotel Taxes from Orange County

The Scoring Third also mentioned that the Orlando group was in New York on Monday meeting with Major League Soccer, including MLS commissioner Don Garber.Things are still progressing for Orlando after the bill failure in the Florida House of Representatives. Local officials in Orlando are also said to be pleased with the new funding plan for the stadium as well.
 

"i had a hundy but i bet a grand"
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
8,199
Tokens
and just to add to the insanity of it all...i have never been to an mls game and probably have watched less than a full 90' combined throughout the years it's been in existence,,,when this stadium is finally built and play begins i will conservatively live less than 20 mins by auto and i will still go to more home games for City in Manchester each year than this place....
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,118,813
Messages
13,559,943
Members
100,690
Latest member
Christie28
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com