MLS All Stars vs West Ham..

Search

OTK

A goal without a plan is just a wish.
Joined
Jun 25, 2008
Messages
3,536
Tokens
I might take a shot with West Ham +240. I just don't see how a MLS team, even if it is an all star team, could be better than an EPL team that plays together on a regular basis. I'll also most likely play the over.
 

I'm from the government and I'm here to help
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,512
Tokens
mrcleo actually angel made it ahead of emilio for some reason. no idea which players were called in place of the 3 olympians though...emilio may be one.

funny you guys are so interested in this game. i'd rather watch san jose play san jose reserves than this thing.
 

" Thanks for tip Bricktop "
Joined
Jun 28, 2005
Messages
11,367
Tokens
Donovan, Blanco, Angel, Beckham, Joseph, De Rosario......make no mistake, this all star team is jacked and wll be very keen to win this game with a lot of interest in England due to West Ham's participation. The game is being shown live at the telly and all the bookies have a full page betting coupon so this game will definately get some attention in Ireland & England. Beckham will play most if not all of this game if its close, he takes all free kicks and will be very motivated to put one over the Hammers being a London boy so I'm gonna throw a few pennies on him to score at + 330.
 

Woah, woah, Daddy's wrong, Mommy's right.
Joined
Feb 25, 2006
Messages
7,977
Tokens
I might take a shot with West Ham +240. I just don't see how a MLS team, even if it is an all star team, could be better than an EPL team that plays together on a regular basis. I'll also most likely play the over.

<table class="wikitable"><tbody><tr><td>2002</td> <td>MLS All Stars</td> <td>USA</td> <td>3-2</td> <td>RFK Stadium</td> <td>Washington, D.C.</td> <td>31,096</td> </tr> <tr> <td>2003</td> <td>MLS All Stars</td> <td>Guadalajara</td> <td>3-1</td> <td>Home Depot Center</td> <td>Carson, California</td> <td>27,000^</td> </tr> <tr> <td>2004</td> <td>East</td> <td>West</td> <td>3-2</td> <td>RFK Stadium</td> <td>Washington, D.C.</td> <td>21,378</td> </tr> <tr> <td>2005</td> <td>MLS All Stars</td> <td>Fulham</td> <td>4-1</td> <td>Columbus Crew Stadium</td> <td>Columbus, Ohio</td> <td>23,309^</td> </tr> <tr> <td>2006</td> <td>MLS All Stars</td> <td>Chelsea</td> <td>1-0</td> <td>Toyota Park</td> <td>Bridgeview, Illinois</td> <td>21,210^</td> </tr> <tr> <td>2007</td> <td>MLS All Stars</td> <td>Celtic</td> <td>2-0</td> <td>Dick's Sporting Goods Park</td> <td>Commerce City, Colorado</td> <td>18,661^<sup id="cite_ref-1" class="reference">[2]</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>
MLS views this game as a proving ground, EPL (and Chivas and Celtic) view it as a friendly, don't tackle and are still getting into shape. Chelsea and Celtic put out much better teams than West Ham will and they both lost. Fulham got hammered with a team fairly comparable to this West Ham team, only slightly worse.

The biggest difference this year is the missing MLS guys (Ching, DeRosario, Guzan, Klejstan, Rogers, Wynne, Edu, Altidore, Parkhurst).
 

Rx. Senior
Joined
Sep 20, 2003
Messages
17,238
Tokens
On MLS here. Like the fact they are in playing shape and the Hammers are still a few weeks away from gearing up.
 

Rx. Senior
Joined
Sep 20, 2003
Messages
17,238
Tokens
Final 3-2 MLS. MLS pretty much dominated possession and the second West Ham goal was more of a fluke deflection. They were the better side pretty clearly.
 
Joined
Jun 23, 2006
Messages
7,174
Tokens
man did i snooze on this one. didnt even know it was going to be played tonight. for some reason thought it was saturday
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,118,925
Messages
13,561,509
Members
100,707
Latest member
johnyjoy06
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com