Try this: http://www.sdql.com/
Pretty easy to navigate. Didn't get wealthy from oil and gas by not knowing the numbers, LOL. You need some help with that site, throw up a smoke signal.
~T~
Try this: http://www.sdql.com/
Pretty easy to navigate. Didn't get wealthy from oil and gas by not knowing the numbers, LOL. You need some help with that site, throw up a smoke signal.
~T~
Great job Kevy.
What a game. Yankees stadium operaters tried to cheat the O's. Kept the lights off when they were suppose to turn them on. No one is hitting Chapman in the dark. Amazing Wellington got on with that single. But he can really hit for a catcher. Then they try to turn the lights on in the bottom of the 10th. And thank God the umps caught it.
They turn the lights on in the top of the 11th and we score 3. Cheating ass yankees.
What a game. Yankees stadium operaters tried to cheat the O's. Kept the lights off when they were suppose to turn them on. No one is hitting Chapman in the dark. Amazing Wellington got on with that single. But he can really hit for a catcher. Then they try to turn the lights on in the bottom of the 10th. And thank God the umps caught it.
They turn the lights on in the top of the 11th and we score 3. Cheating ass yankees.
Monday 5-1-17
2* Milwaukee Brewers +1 -104
In post #17 of this thread John provided a +1/-1 line calculator.
You can easily save on average about 15 cents give or take when
you do these yourself.
I lined this game St.Louis -110 and the books have it around -145
I decided to create me a +1 line with Milwaukee and roll with that at -104
GL Monday Bases
2* Milwaukee Brewers +1 -104
In post #17 of this thread John provided a +1/-1 line calculator.
You can easily save on average about 15 cents give or take when
you do these yourself.
I lined this game St.Louis -110 and the books have it around -145
I decided to create me a +1 line with Milwaukee and roll with that at -104
GL Monday Bases
~T~ first of all thank you sir for the link for the sdql for beginners that you shared. Much appreciated.
You will get a better price creating your own -1 & +1 prices using that link that John provided. Most all
of the books that offer that line are marking it up on average of about 15 cents. Not sure what Tony at
5D's does. But the out I placed my wager at wanted to charge me -120 if I used their drop down box
with their price. I created my own at the same shop and made it -104 and saved 16 cents.
Coach Kevy
Lets talk theory and strategy:
A player might look at todays +1 play and say hey Kevy you don't have any conviction on
Milwaukee as the dog if you're playing them at +1 ( or even a +1.5)??
How I approached this play was based on how I lined the Cards at -110 and the books lining
it at -145 This game to me is basically a pick em according to my line. Besides lining every game
I run what I have called over the years my two sets of numbers. What they are is two different
sets of scoring projections that I created . One set had the Brewers by 2 and the other set had them
losing by 1 If both sets had them outright I would have rolled straight ML. Bases on my line and the one set
having them by 2 I could have made a case for the straight ML wager. I looked at the run line and seen the
books pricing it at -160 and said no thanks to that. Some times it's not about how much we win but about
what we don't lose. I'm not a heavy chalk guy on straight wagers. So to me being able to get one run of
insurance on what my line sees as a pickem game at -104 was the way to roll.
I wanted to do a write up like this for future reference when you see me on a +1 or +1.5 so you know sorta
where I'm coming from when I use a +1 or +1.5
A player might look at todays +1 play and say hey Kevy you don't have any conviction on
Milwaukee as the dog if you're playing them at +1 ( or even a +1.5)??
How I approached this play was based on how I lined the Cards at -110 and the books lining
it at -145 This game to me is basically a pick em according to my line. Besides lining every game
I run what I have called over the years my two sets of numbers. What they are is two different
sets of scoring projections that I created . One set had the Brewers by 2 and the other set had them
losing by 1 If both sets had them outright I would have rolled straight ML. Bases on my line and the one set
having them by 2 I could have made a case for the straight ML wager. I looked at the run line and seen the
books pricing it at -160 and said no thanks to that. Some times it's not about how much we win but about
what we don't lose. I'm not a heavy chalk guy on straight wagers. So to me being able to get one run of
insurance on what my line sees as a pickem game at -104 was the way to roll.
I wanted to do a write up like this for future reference when you see me on a +1 or +1.5 so you know sorta
where I'm coming from when I use a +1 or +1.5
