chris rock said it best, people expect praise for doing things they are supposed to do "i take care of my kids" HA! you're supposed to take care of your kids, what do you want? a cookie?
ms obama was cheered when she gave her speech
ms trump gives the same speech and gets an ok reaction and then gets slammed for rebooting obamas speech.
forget the plagiarism, but you can't serve the same crap to gop and expect the same results.
watch hillary get up during her convention, she'll want a trophy for doing everyday crap that people are supposed to do and the crowd will go nuts.
I raised a kid
I had a mom
I worked hard
I care about people
I help the poor
so freaking what? you're supposed to do that stuff, what does she want? a cookie?
drives me nuts
ms obama was cheered when she gave her speech
ms trump gives the same speech and gets an ok reaction and then gets slammed for rebooting obamas speech.
forget the plagiarism, but you can't serve the same crap to gop and expect the same results.
watch hillary get up during her convention, she'll want a trophy for doing everyday crap that people are supposed to do and the crowd will go nuts.
I raised a kid
I had a mom
I worked hard
I care about people
I help the poor
so freaking what? you're supposed to do that stuff, what does she want? a cookie?
drives me nuts
There is not a single candidate within our lifetimes that would not have been eliminated from consideration for the presidency based on the lies she told to Congress about the email sitchoo, John Edwards got booted for Sex stuff, Gary WhatsHisName from Colorado for smoking weed (I think) Biden for plagiarizing, Ross Perot a no-go for being too short and moving around too fast like a high-strung parakeet yet you guys refuse to eliminate Hillary.
The Opposite, in fact. You insist on electing her President.
Just the lying to Congress alone would have eliminated literally any other candidate, not just in this race but any race for office. Not even broaching the EMail Deal itself or what a Valid Investigation of Clinton Foundation activities/financial misdoings would bring or an Honest pursuit of Bill's Sexual Assaults of staffers and other women & Hillary's accomplicement to those....
or multiple other things that could be mentioned.
Why does The Democratic Party refuse to replace Hillary with a candidate that is qualified for the presidency? And Worthy of this?
Why do RX posters think they know more than the FBI director?
The republican director( who supported Romney and McCain) would love nothing more than to stick it to Obama and Hillary.....so why didn't he? The answer is simple.....nothing rose to level on criminal prosecution. Let's not try the false narrative that he did it to keep his job. He's capable man with an outstanding resume and respected on both sides of the aisle. Plus he's not gonna get fired or lose his job if he decided to prosecute. He's not gonna ruin his name, which he spent a lifetime building,to protect Hillary Clinton.
At some point republicans are gonna have to drop these phony scandals and run for office on their own merit. Because let's be honest, the candidates repubs have put up forever, have all been duds. It will only get worse this time as well, especially after Trump gets mashed in debates.
a more qualified person? You may not like Hillary but she is certainly qualified to be president. Especially when you compare to her opponent.
Frankly there was no absolutely no reason not to have brought charges against Hillary. If you read the federal statutes, she clearly committed numerous felonies which should have at least been brought to trial.
With regards to her qualifications I can't think of one thing she did as Secretary of State that was a positive.
With regards to her qualifications I can't think of one thing she did as Secretary of State that was a positive.
I feel ya on The Comey sitchoo, I have No Beef with the man myself. Admittedly I don't know The Law as that pertains to any of this and suspect that Lying to Congress would not be an F.B.I. Matter but D.O.J.
Loretta Lynch.
Aw Lawd Hep Me.
Haz anyone ever seen this woman and a 33 year younger than he is now Al Sharpton with a closer cropped hairdoo
in the same room together? At the same time?
If not then I am sure they are the same person.
So your answer is that we have Evolved to a place wherein we do not boot candidates any longer for "Trivial" or "Phony" as you put it, Scandals anymore. Thats possible.
I wonder when exactly that happened and what led to it. Maybe Monica Lewinsky? Elliot Spitzer? The fact that so many Scandals have happened? Society has just arrived at "Oh The Hell With it. Whatever."?
Possible I guess. Evolution has to happen sometime.
You'd agree that She has withstood this storm solely due to the fact that she has a Vagina. And not a Penis. You agree to that.
No Point in even trying to Disagree. Because You Agree.
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2011-title18/pdf/USCODE-2011-title18-partI-chap37-sec798.pdf
By the way, here is one of the many Federal Regulations she violated:
18 USC 798. Disclosure of Classified Information.
There are at least another half dozen laws that were clearly violated.
By the way, here is one of the many Federal Regulations she violated:
18 USC 798. Disclosure of Classified Information.
There are at least another half dozen laws that were clearly violated.
