Marquee Divisional Round Picks - YTD: 30-15-2 (66.7%) , +$523

[Call_Me_Marquee]

Told you that pathetic oline would get exposed. Been happening all year particularly on the road. All started when they traded a pro bowl center for a one trick pony tight end who's trick they don't even use correctly!

Yup nicely called. Glad it helped contribute to that Over

Easy spending that $12 all in one place tonight. Haha that even get a cup of coffee in NY

Haha this actually made me laugh. Not a coffee drinker but it's probably close. It's enough for one beer in an NYC bar

Matt Zylbert updated vegas insider tout record: - $5,000+

Matt Zylbert/Catsoverunders/Call_Me_Marquee updated Vegas Insider record: - $5,000+ over a 4 year period. I wonder what those 10 paid customers are going to do without you lolololol

Lol uhh... Ok? Wow, now he's so desperate to troll he's just making up random numbers. Buddy, your attempts to leech off my threads aren't working very well, especially while you continue to suck with your bets. Maybe that's why no one visits your threads?

Hey man, congrats on your 1-1 performance last night, brings up you overall football betting record a full percentage point. Bad_Cat's Updated 2016-17 NFL Betting Record: 21-29-1 (42%) <<

 

[XSPower]

What are the odds this trend get moved to the Rubber Room???? Moving on.....

 

[Call_Me_Marquee]

Man this GB/DAL game is tough to cap. To be honest, I'm leaning just towards playing a prop and that's it. No need to force anything with the spread as high as it is, and the O/U looks tough to work with as well

 

[OverThinker]

I actually think line is short but i been wrong before. Dez over props seem like they outta cash.

 

[Call_Me_Marquee]

I actually think line is short but i been wrong before. Dez over props seem like they outta cash.

Oh I agree, wouldn't have been surprised if Dallas was a TD favorite. When I say "as high as it is," just referring to how it's tough to work with because Green Bay could very easily be competitive and lose by 3 or 4 for the narrow backdoor

 

[Call_Me_Marquee]

Ok sorry guys, no side or total play from me in GB/DAL, but if you're into props, I have a really strong one you should definitely consider - Aaron Rodgers Over 41.5 Pass Attempts (note: these rare props I mention don't go on my record). If you think about it, if GB wins outright, you gotta figure that's because of a high-volume game from Rodgers, and if they're losing and playing from behind, well, they'll be passing frequently to catch up. Going over 41.5 attempts is very manageable

 

[Call_Me_Marquee]

Rodgers 20 pass attempts already with 7+ minutes left in 1st Half, should be good

 

[Call_Me_Marquee]

And the Winning continues, although certainly had to sweat that out

 

[Call_Me_Marquee]

Wow tough pair of Conference Title Games. Don't remember an over/under being as high as it is for GB/ATL

 

[Bad_Cat]

JUST A LITTLE FIRED TOUT THREAD CLEAN UP.

@ Call_ Me_Marquee/Catsoverunders/Matt Zylbert

Let's go over a few of your recommendations that, of course you didn't wager or count against your record, even though you suggested others to make a bet with your horrible opinions.

"PIT -1, SEA +14.5, SEA/ATL O40.5 (-120)
$48 to win $40

Of course, Pittsburgh was a no-brainer, easily taking care of Miami last Sunday. So now I'm left with two details from SEA/ATL, both of which I feel pretty good about and highly recommend for any teaser. The Seahawks have a legitimate chance to win outright here, but no matter the result, I expect a close, competitive contest that figures to be decided by a score, making SEA +14.5 sound very desirable. Should be a fun game, and one in which I anticipate a healthy amount of points, so I'm pleased to have O40.5 in there as well."

WRONG. The Seahawks have a legitimate chance of winning? You expect a close, competitive game? Wrong Lol. Does that count against your record or is that creative report writing Mr. Journalist lol.

"For me, spread action is either Seattle +7 or no bet. This game is going to be tight and competitive in my opinion, Seahawks won't disappoint in this spot because of their playoff experience, while Falcons have been consistent all season, and this could also be the final NFL game in the history of The Georgia Dome. This is probably decided by single digits, so it would only make most sense to grab the Seahawks getting a touchdown. Just a strong lean for now"

WRONG

"When I say as high as it is," just referring to how it's tough to work with because Green Bay could very easily be competitive and lose by 3 or 4 for the narrow backdoor"

WRONG

"(note: these rare props I mention don't go on my record)."

Pops don't go on your record? Hmm, why is that? Is it because you don't bet what you post or because your prop record is horrible lol

"And the Winning continues, although certainly had to sweat that out"

Did you bet the prop or just say this because the suggestion won and why in the hell would you say this if it doesn't go on your record?

"Wow tough pair of Conference Title Games. Don't remember an over/under being as high as it is for GB/ATL"

News flash Mr Vegas Insider. You don't remember because this high of a total is the highest in NFL history dummy.


This is 1 week worth of useless bullshit. You either recommend a play at a certain number, then when the play loses you say "That's why I decided not to make a play" OR you suggest something and say it doesn't count on your record OR you give opinions to sway someone to one side them never post a play. Lol. I doubt if you even bet a dollar on any of your garbage.

Tout tactics at its finest lol

Care to post a bet ticket on your 1 win last week, your $10 over bet?

 

[Call_Me_Marquee]

JUST A LITTLE FIRED TOUT THREAD CLEAN UP.

@ Call_ Me_Marquee/Catsoverunders/Matt Zylbert

Let's go over a few of your recommendations that, of course you didn't wager or count against your record, even though you suggested others to make a bet with your horrible opinions.

"PIT -1, SEA +14.5, SEA/ATL O40.5 (-120)
$48 to win $40

Of course, Pittsburgh was a no-brainer, easily taking care of Miami last Sunday. So now I'm left with two details from SEA/ATL, both of which I feel pretty good about and highly recommend for any teaser. The Seahawks have a legitimate chance to win outright here, but no matter the result, I expect a close, competitive contest that figures to be decided by a score, making SEA +14.5 sound very desirable. Should be a fun game, and one in which I anticipate a healthy amount of points, so I'm pleased to have O40.5 in there as well."

WRONG. The Seahawks have a legitimate chance of winning? You expect a close, competitive game? Wrong Lol. Does that count against your record or is that creative report writing Mr. Journalist lol.

"For me, spread action is either Seattle +7 or no bet. This game is going to be tight and competitive in my opinion, Seahawks won't disappoint in this spot because of their playoff experience, while Falcons have been consistent all season, and this could also be the final NFL game in the history of The Georgia Dome. This is probably decided by single digits, so it would only make most sense to grab the Seahawks getting a touchdown. Just a strong lean for now"

WRONG

"When I say as high as it is," just referring to how it's tough to work with because Green Bay could very easily be competitive and lose by 3 or 4 for the narrow backdoor"

WRONG

"(note: these rare props I mention don't go on my record)."

Pops don't go on your record? Hmm, why is that? Is it because you don't bet what you post or because your prop record is horrible lol

"And the Winning continues, although certainly had to sweat that out"

Did you bet the prop or just say this because the suggestion won and why in the hell would you say this if it doesn't go on your record?

"Wow tough pair of Conference Title Games. Don't remember an over/under being as high as it is for GB/ATL"

News flash Mr Vegas Insider. You don't remember because this high of a total is the highest in NFL history dummy.


This is 1 week worth of useless bullshit. You either recommend a play at a certain number, then when the play loses you say "That's why I decided not to make a play" OR you suggest something and say it doesn't count on your record OR you give opinions to sway someone to one side them never post a play. Lol. I doubt if you even bet a dollar on any of your garbage.

Tout tactics at its finest lol

Care to post a bet ticket on your 1 win last week, your $10 over bet?

Man, you are one sick, delusional psychopath. You have serious problems, dude. Since you've been BANNED from the RX yet again, might be time to address some of those real personal issues you have. Seriously. Get help, since your life (the RX) has been taken away from you.

Hey Bad_Cat, I also recommend calling Gamblers Anonymous. You've been here 5 years and have NEVER posted a winning record. I mean, think about how embarrassing that is. Five full years on one forum, and not even ONCE did he eve post a .500 record. That's as humiliating as it gets. I think the entire forum would agree with me in saying that Bad_Cat is the worst "handicapper" in the history of the RX, having an even worse winning percentage than Brandon Lang.


Bad_Cat's Final 2016-17 NFL Betting Record: 23-29-1 (44%!! LMAO)
(Or 23-33-1 , 41% , if you include his 0-4 record on parlays this year)

azzkick(&^ azzkick(&^ azzkick(&^