If they had a prop listed: what league would be associated with an owner hiring an ex-FBI guy to investigate the officiating in a championship game/series...
what would the nba be, -10000??
Real or perceived, the credibility of the league a huge problem..
Thought this was interesting, from Part #3 at the Oregonlive site
The NBA league office works behind the scenes to manipulate the public discussion on officiating, especially by on-air analysts, according to Van Gundy and others in the broadcast industry.
"They've tried to hurt me with my bosses," Van Gundy said. "They've called my bosses and said, 'Nobody wants to hear that guy whine about officiating.' They're pretty sensitive about that sort of stuff. I'm not quite sure why. I think by critiquing them you're talking of their importance to the game.
"I'm not sure why they'd be upset with that."
This is the problem the league can't seem to understand.
Van Gundy is far away the best in-game commentator in the NBA. Remember this from when he was coaching the Rockets.
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/sports/basketball/nba/rockets/2005-05-02-van-gundy_x.htm
They still remain relevant despite the fact that the majority thinks it is fixed. In reality the Heat and Pacers will play for 2 weeks and it will come down to a handfull of calls or non-calls.
I am not even watching. Watching "Escape from a Nazi death camp" instead.