This is the problem I have with these threads.
There have been a dozen Brady sucks compared to Manning threads and a dozen Manning sucks compared to Brady threads.
I always end up fighting for the guy that everyone says sucks compared to the other guy in these threads.
On the Manning>Brady threads im usually taking up for Brady.
On the Brady>Manning threads im usually taking up for Manning.
Why do people have this great need to put the other guy down to make their case?
They are both great on their own.
You dont have to put the other guy down in order to make your case for your guy.
They are both legends.
They are both GOAT material along with Brees and Rodgers.
Lets just enjoy the greatness.
There have been a dozen Brady sucks compared to Manning threads and a dozen Manning sucks compared to Brady threads.
I always end up fighting for the guy that everyone says sucks compared to the other guy in these threads.
On the Manning>Brady threads im usually taking up for Brady.
On the Brady>Manning threads im usually taking up for Manning.
Why do people have this great need to put the other guy down to make their case?
They are both great on their own.
You dont have to put the other guy down in order to make your case for your guy.
They are both legends.
They are both GOAT material along with Brees and Rodgers.
Lets just enjoy the greatness.
Hey, nice! Posted this back as a teenager, still and always will believe Manning is the greatest of all time.. Although Rodgers is frickin awesome.
I no longer hate Brady like I used to, because I am fair and don't just hold a stubborn bias against anyone forever because that was my initial thought and I must stick to it. He has shown me a lot over the last half decade and really done more challenging things to earn his praise, which I respect. He is a very good quarterback. That said, I do not think he is close to the best of all time.
I no longer waste my time entertaining the moronic thoughts from people with low IQ levels and incomprehension of what makes a good quarterback outside of Super Bowl rings.. Because they know that Trent Dilfer was better than Dan Marino, and that's indisputable.. Just look at the ring count. The #1 undervalued factor that makes Peyton what he is is that he is not just the quarterback, but the head coach, and offensive coordinator as well. No one can touch that, or at least no one hasn't yet.
I no longer hate Brady like I used to, because I am fair and don't just hold a stubborn bias against anyone forever because that was my initial thought and I must stick to it. He has shown me a lot over the last half decade and really done more challenging things to earn his praise, which I respect. He is a very good quarterback. That said, I do not think he is close to the best of all time.
I no longer waste my time entertaining the moronic thoughts from people with low IQ levels and incomprehension of what makes a good quarterback outside of Super Bowl rings.. Because they know that Trent Dilfer was better than Dan Marino, and that's indisputable.. Just look at the ring count. The #1 undervalued factor that makes Peyton what he is is that he is not just the quarterback, but the head coach, and offensive coordinator as well. No one can touch that, or at least no one hasn't yet.
Um , no it's not. They were all doing it.
http://www.sportingnews.com/nfl/sto...-spygate-says-everyone-tried-to-steal-signals
So just because you're a hater of Brady, you choose to maximize one man's claim (an attempt to sell more books), gotcha. Let it be someone you like and you would be ready to defend him. Carry on.
Kind of like you claiming that Kobe didn't rape that chick, even though there was bloody trauma to her vagina, as if you were hiding under the bed watching.
