arty:
I bet that... in like 2 months cuz i'm a no-nut crybaby... >:\ Well sometimes it's 2 weeks. But only if I have a ton of big plays lol
I have no problem that you're on USC (I acutally like it since I'm on OSU), but please stop talking like an idiot. It's not even just the stuff you say, it's how you say it. Most of the time you don't make sense, and when you do I wish you didn't because you're statements are just plain stupid.
Please tell me why USC wins 42-10 in this game? And please lets try to stay away from the expected answer of "they USC bitch, they gonna roll!!!!" Actually, throw in some spelling mistakes and that would make it more of what I expect your answer to be.
Please tell me why USC wins 42-10 in this game? And please lets try to stay away from the expected answer of "they USC bitch, they gonna roll!!!!" Actually, throw in some spelling mistakes and that would make it more of what I expect your answer to be.
I didn't really look at the MLB lines today because I was waiting for the storm to be done with (screws with my day when half the bets get postponed). From looking at it right now though I would say the under is the only thing I would consider playing in that game. Garland isn't worth -160, but it's tough to back Feierabend on the road against the Angels. I would guess it's a 5-3 type of game.
