Line reading 101

[Paddywack]

ehorse has been garbage lately.

 

[DoggieInvestor]

angels was rule 3 and 4 anyway

 

[Paddywack]

Angels rl was a play at 3 books.

 

[ZJP6050]

ehorse has been garbage lately.

the numbers are going to catch up everywhere, at least in my opinion.

 

[ray]

<><> Paddy

 

[jpm]

win some lose some

 

[Paddywack]

<><> Paddy

Now I need the Giants ML and the OVER 8.5. Over looks good but Giants ML looks toast. :>(

 

[ZJP6050]

Now I need the Giants ML and the OVER 8.5. Over looks good but Giants ML looks toast. :>(

please don't say that. i thought your brewer bet was toast, and my cleveland bet was golden. please don't ever fucking say that.

 

[ray]

Sorry Paddy, took Angels myself.

 

[ray]

Angels' bats can't be stopped tonight.

 

[Paddywack]

Angels' bats can't be stopped tonight.

Great for over bettors. :grandmais

 

[DoggieInvestor]

from observation it seems like plays that fit both 1 and 3 rules are strongest plays

 

[letsgohoosiers]

I'm starting to become curious as to what the record would be for Pinnacle vs. other books. Matchbook's unreliable closing lines (could be .01, could be .30) at the end of the game sometimes trigger games that shouldn't be plays. Maybe this is worth looking into.

 

[1968]

I'm starting to become curious as to what the record would be for Pinnacle vs. other books. Matchbook's unreliable closing lines (could be .01, could be .30) at the end of the game sometimes trigger games that shouldn't be plays. Maybe this is worth looking into.

when they are the lowest, stay away.

 

[goblue12]

I'm starting to become curious as to what the record would be for Pinnacle vs. other books. Matchbook's unreliable closing lines (could be .01, could be .30) at the end of the game sometimes trigger games that shouldn't be plays. Maybe this is worth looking into.

Starting today, I am willing to keep track of this for you.

 

[DoggieInvestor]

this is what I have for Rule 3

Mets

brewers

Reds

white sox

arizona

pitt

tampa

SD

Oakland


wondering if im right on oak and SD, the fav price stayed same, so basically they became plays only because of the move from nickel to dime????

 

[Club]

Here's what I see for today.

For Rule 4, it may be early but there appear to be a couple of good possibilities looking at Jamaica.

San Francisco ML has gone from +111 to -127 steadily
Toronto ML has gone from +195 to +177 steadily
Toronto RL has gone from -105 to -130
Pitt ML from +138 to +118
Tampa ML from +126 to +107 with a couple of reversals.

For Rule 3, I have

NYM
Cincy
Pitt

 

[mkcatl]

this is what I have for Rule 3

Mets

brewers

Reds

white sox

arizona

pitt

tampa

SD

Oakland


wondering if im right on oak and SD, the fav price stayed same, so basically they became plays only because of the move from nickel to dime????

hey guys first post here, i've been reading through this thread a little and isn't rule #3 only on the move from nickel to dime, Doggie i think your being a little to lenient with your games right off the bat Mil, Sd, TB, Ari and Oak don't have a significant move imo to call it a play, CWS is close(thats if Rule #3 is only on the switch from nickel to dime, which i think is correct) NYM, Cin, and Pitt are solid.

 

[ZJP6050]

this is what I have for Rule 3

Mets

brewers

Reds

white sox

arizona

pitt

tampa

SD

Oakland


wondering if im right on oak and SD, the fav price stayed same, so basically they became plays only because of the move from nickel to dime????

i only looked at one because you questioned yourself. oakland is not a #3 play. only one i looked at

 

[Paddywack]

this is what I have for Rule 3

Mets

brewers

Reds

white sox

arizona

pitt

tampa

SD

Oakland


wondering if im right on oak and SD, the fav price stayed same, so basically they became plays only because of the move from nickel to dime????

brewers, cws, az, sd, and oak aren't rule three. The rest are from what I could tell.