Line movement: eagles giants

[DocHolliday]

He’s claimed its 67%.

Even though we have posts from Vegas sports books managers amongst other things say other wise along with mutltiple other site. He posted that “regardless of what is posted, his facts and numbers show that 67% is on the giants”

Funny he posted something about streaks earlier:

Do you fade someone that went 0-8 last week— especially when you know he’s a fish?
Or do you follow someone that went 0-8 last week— again know that hes gotta win A few right?

 

[Loves2kickass]

He’s claimed its 67%.

Even though we have posts from Vegas sports books managers amongst other things say other wise along with mutltiple other site. He posted that “regardless of what is posted, his facts and numbers show that 67% is on the giants”

Funny he posted something about streaks earlier:

Do you fade someone that went 0-8 last week— especially when you know he’s a fish?
Or do you follow someone that went 0-8 last week— again know that hes gotta win A few right?

I just hope he's not on the Bungholes tomorrow ?

 

[GasMan]

It was posted in quite a few threads this week about line movement. I discussed how those things don’t exactly add up,

the game in question was how the “public” was on the giants.

vsin Chris Andrew’s article states the following:
Opened eagles 7, they laid, moved to 7.5 they laid. Moved to 8 as of Friday at 4 pacific time. They are still betting the -8.

so again goes back to the info and where you get it. An actual Sportsbook manager is telling you where the money is going. Also looking at social media I’m seeing a lot more eagles than giants.

We have a resident expert here than can read the way vegas works but this clearly shows how easy it is to get the wrong information. I’d trust the above information directly from a Sportsbook manager on a Friday night way more than most information you can get on the internet

You trust a SB manager?

 

[DocHolliday]

He’s openingly giving out info to the public year after year.. week after week… I use that with other things.. such as 14 to 7 on the service play forum… to make my own judgement.

Do i trust a SB manager—- over a guy that went 0-8 last week, and spouts countless information that makes zero sense, writes cotunless long drawn out posts that are multi-colored to prove his idiotic thoughts yet none are provable…. every day and twice on Sunday.

 

[Loves2kickass]

He’s claimed its 67%.

Even though we have posts from Vegas sports books managers amongst other things say other wise along with mutltiple other site. He posted that “regardless of what is posted, his facts and numbers show that 67% is on the giants”

Funny he posted something about streaks earlier:

Do you fade someone that went 0-8 last week— especially when you know he’s a fish?
Or do you follow someone that went 0-8 last week— again know that hes gotta win A few right?

I wonder if the resident expert factored in Patricia Mahomie getting hurt.

 

[MotorCityMadman]

All this is DIGITAL DUNG. A mind is terrible thing to waste. I would consider this DUNG to one of the last tools in the box.

 

[DocHolliday]

YOU JUST CANT MAKE THIS UP.

THE FISH ARE STILL BITING!

9 in a row!!!

 

[Loves2kickass]

? ouch. Could have made alot of money doubling up on all those

 

[skoda]

I just hope he's not on the Bungholes tomorrow ?

Covers is showing...

ATS Consensus: Picks Per Line
65 % CINCINNATI

PICKS
BUFFALO 35 %