general,
its not tonights game you should be excited about, it should be Game 7, which there will be 100%. Flyers win tonight.. and Flyers win the series.. I am not nervous being down 3-2 in the series. Flyers are the much better team, hands down, and it will be proven after they win tonight and Game 7..
its not tonights game you should be excited about, it should be Game 7, which there will be 100%. Flyers win tonight.. and Flyers win the series.. I am not nervous being down 3-2 in the series. Flyers are the much better team, hands down, and it will be proven after they win tonight and Game 7..
regarding the total, I really don't know General, it can go either way, but if you want me to give you some advice, I will, since i like you.
I like the over genny because Philly is going to come out smoking today. They play very well with their backs to the wall. They will come out firing today because the Flyers are a bunch of winners and they will not go down tonight. They will come out pumped. So take the Flyers and the over and toss in a parlay of phi and phi over if you want. I am seeing the Flyers winning tonight big.
Hey, do you have to bet the total too? The over looks good, but is not guaranteed. Why not go with the sure thing only and just bet the Flyers. This way, you know you will win the bet for sure.. Why risk a silly total?
Stick with the sure buck in just Philly.
I like the over genny because Philly is going to come out smoking today. They play very well with their backs to the wall. They will come out firing today because the Flyers are a bunch of winners and they will not go down tonight. They will come out pumped. So take the Flyers and the over and toss in a parlay of phi and phi over if you want. I am seeing the Flyers winning tonight big.
Hey, do you have to bet the total too? The over looks good, but is not guaranteed. Why not go with the sure thing only and just bet the Flyers. This way, you know you will win the bet for sure.. Why risk a silly total?
Stick with the sure buck in just Philly.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by The General:
wagering Minus 150 is like a sin to me buddy.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
i will never understand why gamblers keep saying that. It is the silliest thing i have ever heard in all my life. Who cares genny if it is laying over -150.. If a game is estimated to have a better than 60% chance of winning, then laying -150 will make you a winner in the long haul.
Genny, if the lakers are playing at home against the Magic, but one book has the lakers on the moneyline at -750, instead of the -1500 it is at Pinnacle, would you lay the -750?
That line is over -150....
wagering Minus 150 is like a sin to me buddy.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
i will never understand why gamblers keep saying that. It is the silliest thing i have ever heard in all my life. Who cares genny if it is laying over -150.. If a game is estimated to have a better than 60% chance of winning, then laying -150 will make you a winner in the long haul.
Genny, if the lakers are playing at home against the Magic, but one book has the lakers on the moneyline at -750, instead of the -1500 it is at Pinnacle, would you lay the -750?
That line is over -150....
How can you say it has a 60% or better chance of winning when the plus money has been the way to go so far in the playoffs?
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> Genny, if the lakers are playing at home against the Magic, but one book has the lakers on the moneyline at -750, instead of the -1500 it is at Pinnacle, would you lay the -750?
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
No, Never!
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> Genny, if the lakers are playing at home against the Magic, but one book has the lakers on the moneyline at -750, instead of the -1500 it is at Pinnacle, would you lay the -750?
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
No, Never!
genny,
how can you say you wouldnt lay -750 if the line was -1500. If a line is -1500, then Vegas is saying that the Lakers have a 93% chance of winning.
Now if you laid -750 and won 93 times and lost 7 times, you'd be a millionaire in no time. Just think, you would win 100 bucks 93 times, and you would lose 750, 7 times.. if you do the math, you would see that you would clean up this way. Don't ever say you would not lay a price over -150 genny, because you could be costing yourself a lot of cash..
how can you say you wouldnt lay -750 if the line was -1500. If a line is -1500, then Vegas is saying that the Lakers have a 93% chance of winning.
Now if you laid -750 and won 93 times and lost 7 times, you'd be a millionaire in no time. Just think, you would win 100 bucks 93 times, and you would lose 750, 7 times.. if you do the math, you would see that you would clean up this way. Don't ever say you would not lay a price over -150 genny, because you could be costing yourself a lot of cash..
hey willy, i just got in from watching the game at the bar. Any reason why you edited your post? Maybe you spoke a little too soon there..
Boys, Flyers win the cup, and don't ever doubt sick gambler.
General,
Don't say i didn't give you a winner tonight. I gave you Flyers and Flyers over and even told you to parlay it. Well, you'd be a big winner tonight had you listened to me, but that rule about you never laying more than -150 cost you big and I told you it would. Quit listening to these losers genny and start listening to sick gambler. He really does know his shit. Instead of having the Bolts tonight, you would have had philly tonight..
General,
Don't say i didn't give you a winner tonight. I gave you Flyers and Flyers over and even told you to parlay it. Well, you'd be a big winner tonight had you listened to me, but that rule about you never laying more than -150 cost you big and I told you it would. Quit listening to these losers genny and start listening to sick gambler. He really does know his shit. Instead of having the Bolts tonight, you would have had philly tonight..
