RobFunk said:No, that is not true. When there was a post of an Iraqi sniper killing lots of Americans, the panic from Doc was unmistakable. "OMG what the hell is this? Get these kids home!" or something like that.
In your dreams.
Here's a newsflash for all the "anti-war" poseurs: when a psycho tinpot dictator kills 1 million people, 'war' is long overdue. There is no exaggerating the fact Saddam was ruthless and constantly up to no good. By vehemently opposing his removal, by advocating a previous status-quo, one becomes no different (and certainly no better) than those evil Bush worshippers. Pretending to be 'neutral' conveniently perched on an imaginary self-righteous throne without as much as acknowledging the 'other' reality, is the epidemy of disingenuity and ignorance. You'll notice most of the "anti-war" crowd never bang on about the “killing” (genocide) ongoing in Darfur -- for very good reason. Reality cramps their peace loving fantasies. Therefore, if it's not ongoing in their living room, or front page news, it doesn't exist.
"The kids" knew the dangers of the mission. They were briefed and well aware of the 1525 reasons for invading Iraq. By not supporting or respecting their choice, you not only dishonor their mission they were willing to die for, you provide the enemy with false hope. I mean, who do our enemies hate more? George Bush? Stephen Harper? Or Michael Moore? They love the Moore groupies like Doc Mercer because they have so much in common: both think AMERICA are the bad guys; AMERICA are the 'aggressors.'
So keep up the great work! Mean spirited dissent on the home front, carrying peace placards, and incessantly carping about Abu Ghraib, and Guantanamo, are always great morale boosters for the Jihadists. They too are hoping for a Democrat victory parade