LeBron won't play if Sterling refuses to sell

[akphidelt]

You are comically stupid.

this rank idiot can't stop and see that "liquidating" means turning something into liquid.

If it is already liquid, it can't be "liquidated"

You actually have to try to reach this kid's level of stupid.

This is probably the dumbest thing I've ever read... hahahahahaha!!!! Poor fella, I must say it is fun watching you mess up some of the most basic concepts. Like when you couldn't even do simple division, or you couldn't figure out how statistics work in surveys. Just nonstop entertainment.

 

[akphidelt]

Uh, no it doesn't.

You actually believe "liquid" = cash

No, I believe you liquidate liquid and illiquid assets in to cash, lmao!!! You even make up stupid shit on top of the stupid shit you're already saying.

 

[akphidelt]

I don't wish this embarrassment on my worst enemies man. This is painful to watch.

 

[Acebb]

And where are people getting this most live paycheck to paycheck nonsense from? I'd like to see that study. Most of those studies determine that by whether you have 6 months worth of paychecks in savings.

Really?

Please provide an example of just 1 such study that defines you as living "paycheck to paycheck" if you don't have 6 months pay in savings.

I can't wait to read all about it.

 

[Acebb]

No, I believe you liquidate liquid and illiquid assets in to cash, lmao!!! You even make up stupid shit on top of the stupid shit you're already saying.

Of course you do.

You're an idiot.

You don't know what these words mean. Mainly because you have no real world experience with them.

 

[Acebb]

I don't wish this embarrassment on my worst enemies man. This is painful to watch.

I know.

You're a dumb little kid saying dumb little kid things on the Internet.

 

[akphidelt]

Of course you do.

You're an idiot.

You don't know what these words mean. Mainly because you have no real world experience with them.

Hahahaha, I just can't believe you are still talking. You have absolutely no shame. Trust me, you can liquidate liquid assets, lol.

You should stop.

Idiot.

 

[Acebb]

I completely disagree. The owners and the NBA would fold before the players. The players are represented by a union. We've already see how far they will go over couple % points of revenue.

Yes, we saw "how far" they would go. They gave up $3 billion in revenue.

But of course now you've been reduced to saying that the NBA owners would fold, well, because.

"Hey guys if there were a boycott the NBA owners would totally fold"

"Oh yeah, dummy, why?"

"Because the players sat out last time!"

"Yeah, but they were so desperate for their paychecks they got rolled into giving up $3 billion in revenue"

"I never said they won!" "Union!"

Hilarious.

Idiot.

 

[Acebb]

Trust me, you can liquidate liquid assets, lol.

You should stop.

Idiot.

Uh, no you can't.

LOL

Idiot.

 

[akphidelt]

Uh, no you can't.

LOL

Idiot.

Hahahahahaha... trust me. I would stop if I were you. Once other people get a hold of this, this will go down as one of the more embarrassing moments in RX history. You are really really dumb.

 

[Acebb]

Hahahaha, I just can't believe you are still talking. You have absolutely no shame. Trust me, you can liquidate liquid assets, lol.

You should stop.

Idiot.

Really?

Please provide an example of just 1 such study that defines you as living "paycheck to paycheck" if you don't have 6 months pay in savings.

I can't wait to read all about it.

 

[Acebb]

Hahahahahaha... trust me. I would stop if I were you. Once other people get a hold of this, this will go down as one of the more embarrassing moments in RX history. You are really really dumb.

You don't know what "liquidate" means.

Hint: It means taking a non-liquid asset and turning it to....liquid.

But you can't totally liquidate liquid assets!

And, and, and you can freeze frozen stuff too!!!

idiot.

 

[Acebb]

Hahahahahaha... trust me. I would stop if I were you. Once other people get a hold of this, this will go down as one of the more embarrassing moments in RX history. You are really really dumb.

Really?

Please provide an example of just 1 such study that defines you as living "paycheck to paycheck" if you don't have 6 months pay in savings.

I can't wait to read all about it.

 

[Acebb]

Once other people get a hold of this, this will go down as one of the more embarrassing moments in RX history. You are really really dumb.

I'm quaking in my boots.

 

[akphidelt]

Really?

Please provide an example of just 1 such study that defines you as living "paycheck to paycheck" if you don't have 6 months pay in savings.

I can't wait to read all about it.

Quit trying to distract from the conversation at hand... please tell us all again that you can't liquidate, liquid assets... hahahhahahaha!!!

 

[akphidelt]

You don't know what "liquidate" means.

Hint: It means taking a non-liquid asset and turning it to....liquid.

But you can't totally liquidate liquid assets!

And, and, and you can freeze frozen stuff too!!!

idiot.

Hahahaha, so you are taking an illiquid asset and turning it in to water (that's a joke by the way. I know how you take everything literally, lol)? Lmao, you are so dumb. Liquidate means turning any asset in to cash. I can't believe you are still talking. It just keeps getting better and better.

 

[Acebb]

Quit trying to distract from the conversation at hand... please tell us all again that you can't liquidate, liquid assets... hahahhahahaha!!!

Really?

Please provide an example of just 1 such study that defines you as living "paycheck to paycheck" if you don't have 6 months pay in savings.

I can't wait to read all about it.

 

[Acebb]

Liquidate means turning any asset in to cash.

No it doesn't.

 

[Acebb]

. Most of those studies determine that by whether you have 6 months worth of paychecks in savings. By those standards I live paycheck to paycheck.

Really?

Please provide an example of just 1 such study that defines you as living "paycheck to paycheck" if you don't have 6 months pay in savings.

I can't wait to read all about it.

 

[akphidelt]

Really?

Please provide an example of just 1 such study that defines you as living "paycheck to paycheck" if you don't have 6 months pay in savings.

I can't wait to read all about it.

I misread the article. It was 6 months of expenses in savings not 6 months pay. That's the difference between you and I. If I make a mistake I'll admit it.

Roughly three-quarters of Americans are living paycheck-to-paycheck, with little to no emergency savings, according to a survey released by Bankrate.com Monday.

Fewer than one in four Americans have enough money in their savings account to cover at least six months of expenses, enough to help cushion the blow of a job loss, medical emergency or some other unexpected event, according to the survey of 1,000 adults. Meanwhile, 50% of those surveyed have less than a three-month cushion and 27% had no savings at all.

http://money.cnn.com/2013/06/24/pf/emergency-savings/