wtf is wrong with these fools 
Wonder if that idiot climate change sheep TrashMoney still lurks here
www.breitbart.com
Vance Successfully Flipped the Script on Climate Change During Debate
Sen. JD Vance (R-OH) successfully flipped the script on "climate change" during Tuesday evening's vice-presidential debate.
www.breitbart.com
Commander Trump and the Q Team Prepare to Finish Off the Climate Hoax
We now learn that NOAA - the agency which stores dubious data supporting the Climate Change Hoax -- is on the chopping block of Commander Trump and the Q Team.
NY Times: Could Trump’s Return Pose a Threat to Climate and Weather Data?
*
Project 2025, the conservative playbook, calls for breaking up the federal agency that maintains weather data and collects climate change information.
More good news to report --- or rather, more good news being promised / telegraphed to us. We now learn that NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) -- the corrupt agency which stores dubious data supporting the Climate Change Hoax -- is, along with the Fed, the Department of Education, the CIA etc, on the chopping block of Commander Trump and the Q Team. The happy recap, from the Q York Times:
"The agency that oversees that omnipresent data could now be under threat by a second Trump administration. That’s according to Project 2025, the policy framework put together by the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. The authors of the nearly 900 page document wrote that NOAA “should be broken up and downsized,” calling the agency that employs 12,000 workers across the world “one of the main drivers of the climate change alarm industry.”
Oh the winning that is to come. So much winning, and on so many fronts. It calls to mind a hard-to-believe (at the time) prediction shouted out by then Candidate Trump at a 2016 rally:
.
"If I become president, we're going to win so much, we're going to win economically, we're going to win the military. We're going to win with health care. We're going to win with every single facet. We're going to win so much, you may even get tired of winning. And you'll say please, please, it's too much winning. We can't take it anymore. Mr. President, it's too much winning. And I'll say, no it isn't. We have to keep winning. We're going to win more."
.
Tell it, Trump. Tell it!
Functioning as the psudeoempirical arm of the Global Warming / Climate Change Hoax, NOAA's data rigging is infamous. It includes weather data, tree ring data, ice core data, sea level measurement, ocean temps and ocean "acidity." Here's how the three-step propaganda process works:
.
Step 1: The paid whores of NOAA report some "disturbing" data (rigged)
Step 2: Fake News publicizes the "findings" of this "prestigious" agency
Step 3: Politicians react to the findings (more regulations, more "green energy" scams and more treaties)
Step 4: Return to Step 1
.
The moment one questions the underlying premise and / or validity of data associated with Step 1, Fake News tars him as a "Climate Change Denier." You see, the NOAA High Priests of the Climate Con are NEVER to be questioned. We must accept their decrees at face value. They are "scientists," dontcha' know?
.
This dirty and dangerous "world government by the backdoor" game is over now. From Trump's mass firing of "climate scientists" at the EPA and the Supreme Quort's neutering of same; to the exit from the wicked and destructive Paris Climate Treaty; and now, to the imminent demise of NOAA -- the Q Plan has achieved a major objective which was specifically foretold to us in Q posts.
.
To say, "trust the plan" at this point is rather redundant. Perhaps, "Simply open your eyes and see the plan unfolding" would be more accurate.
Q Post 3647 / December 3, 2019
(image & text)
Who audits where the money actually goes?
What % is typically categorized as costs?
How to 'steal' taxpayer money?
The 'Con':
>Determine 'topic(s)' that have emotional pull (connect) on 'vocal' types
>Create media blitz [scare] campaign ('talking points')('alarmist')
>Use 'pro-narrative minded' authorities on subject to provide foundation to support
>Deploy 'circular reporting' and 'group-think' tactics (echo chamber) to artificially raise 'public outcry'
>Use 'public outcry' to justify billion dollar taxpayer spend
>Rinse/repeat
Who audits where the money goes?
Q
The "spontaneous" green mobs have gone silent.
We now learn that NOAA - the agency which stores dubious data supporting the Climate Change Hoax -- is on the chopping block of Commander Trump and the Q Team.
NY Times: Could Trump’s Return Pose a Threat to Climate and Weather Data?
*
Project 2025, the conservative playbook, calls for breaking up the federal agency that maintains weather data and collects climate change information.
More good news to report --- or rather, more good news being promised / telegraphed to us. We now learn that NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) -- the corrupt agency which stores dubious data supporting the Climate Change Hoax -- is, along with the Fed, the Department of Education, the CIA etc, on the chopping block of Commander Trump and the Q Team. The happy recap, from the Q York Times:
"The agency that oversees that omnipresent data could now be under threat by a second Trump administration. That’s according to Project 2025, the policy framework put together by the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. The authors of the nearly 900 page document wrote that NOAA “should be broken up and downsized,” calling the agency that employs 12,000 workers across the world “one of the main drivers of the climate change alarm industry.”
Oh the winning that is to come. So much winning, and on so many fronts. It calls to mind a hard-to-believe (at the time) prediction shouted out by then Candidate Trump at a 2016 rally:
.
"If I become president, we're going to win so much, we're going to win economically, we're going to win the military. We're going to win with health care. We're going to win with every single facet. We're going to win so much, you may even get tired of winning. And you'll say please, please, it's too much winning. We can't take it anymore. Mr. President, it's too much winning. And I'll say, no it isn't. We have to keep winning. We're going to win more."
.
Tell it, Trump. Tell it!
Functioning as the psudeoempirical arm of the Global Warming / Climate Change Hoax, NOAA's data rigging is infamous. It includes weather data, tree ring data, ice core data, sea level measurement, ocean temps and ocean "acidity." Here's how the three-step propaganda process works:
.
Step 1: The paid whores of NOAA report some "disturbing" data (rigged)
Step 2: Fake News publicizes the "findings" of this "prestigious" agency
Step 3: Politicians react to the findings (more regulations, more "green energy" scams and more treaties)
Step 4: Return to Step 1
.
The moment one questions the underlying premise and / or validity of data associated with Step 1, Fake News tars him as a "Climate Change Denier." You see, the NOAA High Priests of the Climate Con are NEVER to be questioned. We must accept their decrees at face value. They are "scientists," dontcha' know?
.
This dirty and dangerous "world government by the backdoor" game is over now. From Trump's mass firing of "climate scientists" at the EPA and the Supreme Quort's neutering of same; to the exit from the wicked and destructive Paris Climate Treaty; and now, to the imminent demise of NOAA -- the Q Plan has achieved a major objective which was specifically foretold to us in Q posts.
.
To say, "trust the plan" at this point is rather redundant. Perhaps, "Simply open your eyes and see the plan unfolding" would be more accurate.
Q Post 3647 / December 3, 2019
(image & text)
Who audits where the money actually goes?
What % is typically categorized as costs?
How to 'steal' taxpayer money?
The 'Con':
>Determine 'topic(s)' that have emotional pull (connect) on 'vocal' types
>Create media blitz [scare] campaign ('talking points')('alarmist')
>Use 'pro-narrative minded' authorities on subject to provide foundation to support
>Deploy 'circular reporting' and 'group-think' tactics (echo chamber) to artificially raise 'public outcry'
>Use 'public outcry' to justify billion dollar taxpayer spend
>Rinse/repeat
Who audits where the money goes?
Q
The "spontaneous" green mobs have gone silent.
Appearing on Good Morning America in 2008, Bob Woodruff hyped Earth 2100, a special that pushed apocalyptic predictions of the then-futuristic 2015.
The segment included supposedly prophetic videos, such as a teenager declaring, “It’s June 8th, 2015. One carton of milk is $12.99.” (On the actual June 8, 2015, a gallon of milk cost, on average, $3.39.) Another clip featured this prediction for the current year: “Gas reached over $9 a gallon.” (In reality, gas costs an average of $2.75.)
On June 12, 2008, correspondent Bob Woodruff revealed that the program “puts participants in the future and asks them to report back about what it is like to live in this future world. The first stop is the year 2015.”
As one expert warns that in 2015 the sea level will rise quickly, a visual shows New York City being engulfed by water. The video montage includes another unidentified person predicting that “flames cover hundreds of miles.”
Then-GMA co-anchor Chris Cuomo appeared frightened by this future world. He wondered, “I think we’re familiar with some of these issues, but, boy, 2015? That’s seven years from now. Could it really be that bad?”
The segment included supposedly prophetic videos, such as a teenager declaring, “It’s June 8th, 2015. One carton of milk is $12.99.” (On the actual June 8, 2015, a gallon of milk cost, on average, $3.39.) Another clip featured this prediction for the current year: “Gas reached over $9 a gallon.” (In reality, gas costs an average of $2.75.)
On June 12, 2008, correspondent Bob Woodruff revealed that the program “puts participants in the future and asks them to report back about what it is like to live in this future world. The first stop is the year 2015.”
As one expert warns that in 2015 the sea level will rise quickly, a visual shows New York City being engulfed by water. The video montage includes another unidentified person predicting that “flames cover hundreds of miles.”
Then-GMA co-anchor Chris Cuomo appeared frightened by this future world. He wondered, “I think we’re familiar with some of these issues, but, boy, 2015? That’s seven years from now. Could it really be that bad?”
