Last 15* GOY

jcambert · Mar 28, 2004

I agree, Philly. St. Joes didn't play it's best game. If it plays it's best game last night, they are a pretty easy winner. I don't think either team played it's best game, but, it's certainly not fair to say that if Okie State plays it's best game they cover, becuase, NEITHER team did.

JP

SWEETLOU+ · Mar 28, 2004

jcambert, your above post has me baffled. so you say neither team played there best game yet if both teams would have st.joes would have won rather easily???? OSU played there worst game in a long time. They were dominate underneath and the only thing that kept the game from being a blow-out was the 16-0 points of of turnovers in the first half for st.joes. If OSU protects tha ball like they usually do there up 10plus at half and cruise home for a easy win. I really find it amazing what some people see whem watching a game or capping it. This is a great example of the blind speaking jibberish after the fact.

jcambert · Mar 28, 2004

Hey, SOS, I didn't say that. I said that if you are going to use the fact that OSU played a bad game, then so did St. Joe's. If OSU plays the game they did last night (a bad one), and St. Joe's plays the way they normally do, then they win easily. THAT is what I said. My point is, you can't use that excuse, because neither team played their best game.

Do you understand now? Would you like me to spoon feed some more?

JP

jcambert · Mar 28, 2004

By the way, moron...after the fact? I called this WAY before the fact. Read all my posts from yesterday. I also find it funny how you obbviously had OSU and are looking for any excuse as to why you lost big. Again, if you are going to use the turnover excuse, then I will say that if St. Joe's hits their threes at a rate even CLOSE to what they are capable of, and have done throughout the entire year, then this game isn't even close. Open your eyes, my friend.

There was no question in my mind as to who was going to cover this game. Vegas, at this time of year, simply does NOT make mistakes like this with the line. EVERYONE was on OSU as an EASY cover...guess what...we don't know more than Vegas does, especially at this time of year, and that was proven again last night.

SWEETLOU+ · Mar 28, 2004

I understood the first time. And its still laughable. St.joes could not matchup with oklahoma st. underneath the only thing that made this a cntest was the turnovers and points off of turnovers in the 1st 1/2. Only a complete square would think otherwise. So I guess I was correct assuming you were that square.

would you like me to spoon feed you some more?

This guy is a blubbering idiot!

lmao

cashflowmatters · Mar 28, 2004

JC Cambert: FYI line opened at 1 1/2 oak st so there is a chance some sharpies middled the game, don't give Vegas odds makers so much credit. Big $$$ went on oak st at 1 1/2 and all the way to 3 1/2. So all who bet Oak st did not lose and most who bet st joes won, so just keep that in mind!

jcambert · Mar 28, 2004

So, answer me this, sweet lou, with fifteen posts. What happens if St. Joe's hits 40% of their threes?

You aren't all that bright, are you?

You know what my aunt would be if she had balls? My uncle. But she doesn't, so she isn't.

Get over the fact that you bought into the whole game of the year crap and lost your entire $200 bankroll. Get over it. You make yourself sound dumber with each post. You are looking blindly at what YOUR team could have done better, to cover, and failing to realize that St. Joe's shot HORRIBLY from three point range, which is something they normally do extremely well.

JP

SWEETLOU+ · Mar 28, 2004

no jacmbert I didn't lose a cent on this game. I hade UCONN -8.5 which won easily. Vegas doesn't make mistakes? And he is using this contest a osu win by 2 as a example. The line opened at 2.5 smart guy!

VEGAS LINESMAKER TALKING:
"Yeah lets open this line at 2.5 to get everyone on osu. I see them winning by 2 so that hook will come in handy in huge payday for us."

lmao at jcambert!

Vegas is at work only in the Duke -8. They want money on Xavier and on UCONN -8.5 THEY WANTED money on bama. They got both to happen and they ended up profiting from it.

jcambert · Mar 28, 2004

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by cashflowmatters:
JC Cambert: FYI line opened at 1 1/2 oak st so there is a chance some sharpies middled the game, don't give Vegas odds makers so much credit. Big $$$ went on oak st at 1 1/2 and all the way to 3 1/2. So all who bet Oak st did not lose and most who bet st joes won, so just keep that in mind!

<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

No, brother, line opened at 2.5. Believe me on that. There wasn't a 2 or 1.5 to be found, and anyone who had that number bought it down to there.

JP

jcambert · Mar 28, 2004

Give it up, Lou, or SOS, you make yourself sound dumber with each passing post. Again, get over your loss. And, I'll find ways to spend my winning while you soak your sorrows.

JP

SWEETLOU+ · Mar 28, 2004

I need to print this out and show my friends this discussion they'll get a kick out of this cambert guy.

LMAO your the man jcambert.

(lets see if he resorts to calling me gay, living in my moms basement, having a $200 bankroll now.)

St.Joes hits 40% of there 3's? nobody except some alum's and squares thought they'd hit 40% against OSU defense. Do you even know how to cap match-ups?

jcambert · Mar 28, 2004

Do I know how to cap matchups? That's funny, considering that I played the winner last night, in my biggest play of the year, which, by the way, I posted before the game went off, and you had the loser, obviously.

Again, moron, if you are going to give Okie State credit as the reason that St. Joe's didn't hit their threes, then you have to give St. Joe's credit for Okie State's turnovers. Did you even WATCH the game? Did you SEE the stifling defense being played by St. Joe's in that game? I doubt seriously if you watched the game.

The right side was to have take St. Joe's, plus the points...period. End of discussion. Don't bother posting again, becuase I won't respond to you again.

I find it funny that a guy with twelve posts, is calling me a square, when I've been here alot longer, and I've been fortunate enough to be able to be a good enough "square" to pay my bills doing this. I'll take a square like that anyday.

JP

SWEETLOU+ · Mar 28, 2004

this guy is the biggest square in the house. hands down. I will be laughing at your comments in this thread for a long time buddy.

delmo · Mar 29, 2004

jcambert: I was just wondering why you continously mention the number of posts an individual has. It seems to me you mention this
only to suggest a person who doesn't have alot
of posts must be stupid. If you are attempting to put someone down you really should try to come up with something a little more clever than this.

jcambert · Mar 29, 2004

I bring up the numbers of posts not to suggest they are stupid, but to suggest that they are the ghost of someone else. Look at when sweet lou became a member. March 27, 2004, and only to pick a fight. Sound like someone familiar to you? Maybe Kodiak? Maybe someone else?

Read the msg boards at offshoregamblersdigest.com and you will see that Kodi can't even stay out of trouble over there.

JP

LineTamer+ · Mar 29, 2004

Reb's thread?

I sure dont come here to read this shit.

Pipe down and run your mouth in you own thread. Going to drive a quality capper outta the forum cause of the good ole highschool ego's.

SoundofSilence · Mar 29, 2004

Seems like you are being paranoid to me...

BTW, you ever plan on explaining you restarting your record after a poor start?

Mr.Misanthrope · Mar 29, 2004

I bow down to your vast experience with over 1,100 posts but when were you installed as the Rx source on what games opened? Cris opened Oklahoma State -1 1/2 and you could still have laid -2 at any of the Coast books on Friday. You jumped into one of my posts questioning where I came off saying Belmont was +6 in the Nit when there were a dozen books on the screen that had that number.

If you are going to be the forum source for what games opened maybe you should do a litle more homework. But then you're 183 times smarter than I am since I've only posted about 65 times.