hno:
I want anyone in here to explain to me how somebody wins KOY who never predicted a delibrate implosion of another planet in the solar system- never confidently asserted the driver shot Kennedy- never said THEY wanted our economy dead-dead-dead ! Never heard of Ignatius Loyola or the elite Knights of Malta- never dared call out the Pope on the fixing of NFL games.
Loren- if its a real Kook they need to lose while they attempt to infiltrate one of their own into the movement you must prevent them from doing this at all costs.
I think they are out to do it up close and personal- you always said they would. Just when you had you eye on the prize - they stuck an ice pick in it. Coincidence- or conspiracy?
I feel your pain man- I know how much you wanted it.
If they have in point of fact done a false flag on you... if this tally holds up to protest... its a delibrate act of contest terrorism and nothing less.
And I know who the the Osama Bin Laden of this group is.
I think they are out to do it up close and personal- you always said they would. Just when you had you eye on the prize - they stuck an ice pick in it. Coincidence- or conspiracy?
I feel your pain man- I know how much you wanted it.
If they have in point of fact done a false flag on you... if this tally holds up to protest... its a delibrate act of contest terrorism and nothing less.
And I know who the the Osama Bin Laden of this group is.
Last edited:
kook [Usenet; originally and more formally, `net.kook'] Term used to describe a regular poster who continually posts messages with no apparent grounding in reality. Different from a troll, which implies a sort of sly wink on the part of a poster who knows better, kooks really believe what they write, to the extent that they believe anything. The kook trademark is paranoia and grandiosity. Kooks will often build up elaborate imaginary support structures, fake corporations and the like, and continue to act as if those things are real even after their falsity has been documented in public. While they may appear harmless, and are usually filtered out by the other regular participants in a newsgroup of mailing list, they can still cause problems because the necessity for these measures is not immediately apparent to newcomers; there are several instances on record, for example, of journalists writing stories with quotes from kooks who caught them unaware. An entertaining web page chronicaling the activities of many notable kooks can be found at `http://www.crank.net/usenet.html'.</PRE>
</PRE>
Mr MJ fits this to a T. The old-school conspiracy theorists have gained too much credibility, they don't sound all that "kooky" anymore do they?</PRE>
</PRE>
Mr MJ fits this to a T. The old-school conspiracy theorists have gained too much credibility, they don't sound all that "kooky" anymore do they?</PRE>
I know the game - it aint gonna work. This is pure Disinfo right out of CentCom psyops division. Good Lord- are they are trying to re-write definitions of words to help the NWO and its desire to see all kooks "filtered out" (gulp--- of the group- like a disease that needs to be cured-asking questions that they cannot answer right up to the day we are removed for speaking out about 9/11 (and continue to act as if those things are real even after their falsity has been documented in public) by the debunkers and the non-tolerators of outrageous conspiracy theories) Who wrote that definition? Heinrich Himnler? That definition- along with being a good illustration of how the propaganda artists work- immediately suggests to the reader that Kooks are "problems" that society needs to be rid of. Is that a post 9/11 definition you are comfortable with? Because it smacks of fascist revisionism to me.
Then - a good little informer does his part and offers up this little tidbit to the State.
"The old-school conspiracy theorists have gained too much credibility, they don't sound all that "kooky" anymore do they?"
Such a Tool you are people who spout such things are for the NWO! Maybe a bit jealous too?. Oh well - whatever floats your boat- but this is the only true definition of a Kook- plain and simple without the propaganda inserted.
<TR><TD class=word>kook </TD><TD class=tools id=tools_110855></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD><TD class=text colspan="2">
A person regarded as strange, eccentric, or crazy.
Now- I dont know about you but I dont think MeMJ fits that definition at all- and I should know.
No- to be a Kook you have to have the right stuff. The odds of an RX'er thinking TR should be in a Mental Hospital or Loren might be a danger to himself is one thing. That the Mister MJ was ever considered certifiable is quite another.:smoker2:
</TD></TR>
Then - a good little informer does his part and offers up this little tidbit to the State.
"The old-school conspiracy theorists have gained too much credibility, they don't sound all that "kooky" anymore do they?"
Such a Tool you are people who spout such things are for the NWO! Maybe a bit jealous too?. Oh well - whatever floats your boat- but this is the only true definition of a Kook- plain and simple without the propaganda inserted.
<TR><TD class=word>kook </TD><TD class=tools id=tools_110855></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD><TD class=text colspan="2">
A person regarded as strange, eccentric, or crazy.
Now- I dont know about you but I dont think MeMJ fits that definition at all- and I should know.
No- to be a Kook you have to have the right stuff. The odds of an RX'er thinking TR should be in a Mental Hospital or Loren might be a danger to himself is one thing. That the Mister MJ was ever considered certifiable is quite another.:smoker2:
</TD></TR>
