What were you saying Duhfinch? THEN ALL 3 ARIZONA ASSHOLES WHO GOT
BUTT FUCKED IN NOVEMBER, BUTT FUCKED IN THEIR LAWSUITS DISPUTING IT,
AND, IN SCARY LAKE'S CASE, BUTT FUCKED IN HER APPEAL.
Speaking of getting BUTT fucked, how many times are YOU gonna get BUTT fucked AND have a molten white hot, BOILING load shot down your throat in the bargain IN THE SAME DAY. Earlier today, you made the INCREDIBLY stupid statement, ""Lying on an application is not a crime anyway but election fraud is a felony…" You managed to "overlook" TWO monstrously wrong things in that one, relatively short statement. Any response to MY reply to that statement, Road SCUM? Somehow, I think not, or, at least, not a RESPONSIVE response. You're incredibly stupid, not to mention, evasive. Now, to your ABOVE incredible stupid statement. Below is a video from 6 days ago. As usual, the owner provides a transcript of what he says. Read it several times, VERY slowly, especially the highlighted parts.
Kari Lake Loses AGAIN As Arizona Supreme Court Smacks Her Down
Kari Lake attempted to get the appeal of her election challenge lawsuit sent directly to the Arizona Supreme Court this week, but the Court outright refused to let that happen, saying that Lake had shown "no good cause" for that to happen. Lake must now wait until later this month for the 3-judge panel at the appellate court to hear her case, and it is unlikely to yield positive results for her, as Farron Cousins explains. She has ALREADY lost appeals within her bullshit lawsuit, you fucking idiot, what about that do you NOT understand? Then there is your ultimately example of "grasping at straws/to a drowning man a lifesaver mint looks like a live preserver," you're actually CROWING about that story that you dug up. Did you actually UNDERSTAND the headline? Obviously, you didn't: ""AZ Court Of Appeals To Expedite Kari Lake Case Regarding 2022 Election" (btw, the rag that published this is obviously full of delusional nutjobs like YOU, I skimmed the 11 comments currently shown under the excitedly reported story, and, you guys need SERIOUS help-but then, that was apparent about YOU the moment that you claimed that tRump was going to be reinstated, not once, but TWICE): Soooooooo, the Arizona Court of Appeals-NOT the Arizona Supreme Court, which is where she tried to go directly to, as detailed in the story below-has said that they will EXPEDITE her appeal. Your reading comprehension skills are obviously very bad, and there are a LOT of words that don't mean what YOU think the mean. For example, "Expedite" does NOT mean "overturn her election loss and have her declared the winner-or, even, order a recount." See how that WORKS, Road SCUM? Hey, your Fuhrer has had multiple facets of his Stolen Documents lawsuit expedited to, like the right to have that bought-and-paid-for SLUT "Loose PUSSY LIPS" Cannon inserted into the case, and to get his own SPECIAL MASTER. Remind me again, how'd those expedited filings turn out? You REALLY need to STFU, you're embarrassing yourself at levels even YOU haven't reached before. But, before you DO STFU, why don't you DAZZLE us with your legal acumen, and show why YOU'RE right, and I'M wrong re: your statement, "Lying on an application is not a crime anyway..." and why the rest of sentence, "but election fraud is a felony" is a TAD misleading: it is, INDEED, a felony, so, why have you Republi-KUNTS, "press" your advantage and show evidence of same? Yeah, THAT'S shut your dumb ass up in a HURRY, you fucking moron.
*This transcript was auto-generated. Please excuse any typos. Perennial Sore Loser, carry Lake.
Lost again in court this week when she tried to get the Arizona Supreme Court to hear her appeal instead of going to the appellate court, which she had already appealed the dismissal of her case too. This is a bit of a weird story. So here's what happened. As we all know, on Christmas Eve, the judge dismissed all of Carrie Lake's claims, dismissed the whole lawsuit trying to overturn the Arizona election results because as the judge said, you've presented no evidence, you've made a lot of claims, a lot of them, and you've given us nothing to back up any of your claims. I have no choice but to dismiss it.
So Carrie Lake then appealed it, you know, through the regular appellate process, it would go to the appellate court. And she did that. She filed it. But then I guess at some point, her and her legal team, who you know or been sanctioned, she's been sanctioned. The legal team is also likely to be sanctioned. Alan Dershowitz, who's a part of it, has actually asked to be excluded from the sanctions, like that story came out earlier the week and I find it hilarious cuz he is just like, Hey, uh, I know you'll probably gonna sanction us, would you mind just not sanctioning me? Like, that's not how it works, Alan. And you know that. But anyway, she didn't wanna wait for the appellate court to take up the case. So what she then did was she filed it with the State Supreme Court in Arizona and said, listen, I don't wanna wait for these guys. They're telling me it might not be till January 24th at the earliest that they can even hear Earl oral arguments. Oh hell no, I want y'all to hear it. And so this week the Arizona Supreme Court simply said, no. Why? Why, why would we do that? They smacked her down pretty hard. They said, quote, no good cause appears to transfer this matter to this court. Like you've shown no reason at all, is what they're saying, why we should handle this instead of that appellate court. Like there, there's, there's nothing in what you've said that would indicate that we need to even look at this. Like you're going through the process as you're supposed to. So why, why in the hell would we get involved? It almost seemed like these judges on the Arizona Supreme Court were confused by the fact that she would even try to place it in front of them, especially after one, as I said, the appellate Court already set a tentative date for oral arguments. And two, Katie Hobbs, the Democrat, has already been sworn in there. There's no legal mechan mechanism for Carrie Lake to become the governor now. Like it simply doesn't exist in Arizona law. Like even if Carrie Lake is somehow successful with her appeal, which ain't gonna happen, then what? Like that's the big question too, that nobody knows the answer to because it's not a thing that's ever happened and there's not anything in the law books that tell you what to do. So even if she wins, she still loses cuz she can't fix the situation. And of course, that's all hypothetical because we know she's not gonna win. If you didn't have evidence to show the lower court, I, I, I'm willing to bet you're not gonna have evidence to show the appellate court and you can appeal it from there once they smack it down too, which will happen. We all know that. And Carrie Lake will continue to appeal this because she wants to remain relevant, but in the end it's gonna go away and hopefully Carrie Lake will too.