Just got a PM from someone with 0 post named Paytonsucks

[PatsFan1283]

You don't call other posters creating a poll/thread asking he be banned is poking??

Yeah, but that was a long time ago. I mean, why he got banned had nothing to do with that.

He got banned because something in the sports sub-forum made him lose his privileges and BAS went off on him (I dunno what happened, wasn't posting at the time. Didn't see this thread until a few weeks later)

http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=1129155

Then a few weeks later, he posted what he did re gambling ring.

 

[HacheMan]

Also, I got another PM yesterday I shared with Hache. It was ghost impersonating RX management. It’s a new tactic.

Not trying to argue, but listen to what you're saying fuego.

When I pointed out that I could not be 100% sure who sent those private messages because we had also just gotten emails from 1-2 other banned posters saying very similar things, you, pats, and chop all had wise cracks saying that was BS.

But now you see that it was a 'new tactic' and what I said is very accurate.

 

[Enfuego]

You don't call other posters creating a poll/thread asking he be banned is poking??

Call it what you want but he should’ve been banned for at least one year as he lost a bet. It’s fair to ask that he honor his bet and he banned. I didn’t do that but it’s a fair point.

 

[HacheMan]

And here you are again defending the actions of a loon.

It’s like saying “I know murder is wrong but if provoked, that’s gonna happen.”

I'm done with you twisting not only my words but other posters as well.

We can play that game as well.

 

[Enfuego]

Not trying to argue, but listen to what you're saying fuego.

When I pointed out that I could not be 100% sure who sent those private messages because we had also just gotten emails from 1-2 other banned posters saying very similar things, you, pats, and chop all had wise cracks saying that was BS.

But now you see that it was a 'new tactic' and what I said is very accurate.

Because it’s very clear to everyone but you who it is.

 

[HacheMan]

Call it what you want but he should’ve been banned for at least one year as he lost a bet. It’s fair to ask that he honor his bet and he banned. I didn’t do that but it’s a fair point.

Others have posted lately that you, pats, and chop should be banned.

Should we take their word for it?

Wake up you're delusional in thinking you are always right

 

[Enfuego]

I'm done with you twisting not only my words but other posters as well.

We can play that game as well.

I’m not twisting anything. Your words are your words. In your post, you are defending GB yes or no?

 

[HacheMan]

Because it’s very clear to everyone but you who it is.

It's very clear to me who a few trouble makers are which has been pointed out in the past, I overlooked, but now my eyes are open

 

[Enfuego]

Others have posted lately that you, pats, and chop should be banned.

Should we take their word for it?

Wake up you're delusional in thinking you are always right

Ban us for what? Posting personal info? Threatening posters via PM? For what exactly?

 

[HacheMan]

I’m not twisting anything. Your words are your words. In your post, you are defending GB yes or no?

You aren't very bright are you???

I even started out the paragraph stating that SOME WILL TWIST IT SAYING I/WE ARE DEFENDING HIM

 

[Enfuego]

It's very clear to me who a few trouble makers are which has been pointed out in the past, I overlooked, but now my eyes are open

Good for you. Well done.

 

[HacheMan]

Ban us for what? Posting personal info? Threatening posters via PM? For what exactly?

Ban you simply because others think you should be the same way you're saying you think GB should have been banned even before he went haywire

 

[HacheMan]

I can type fast too keep going

 

[Enfuego]

You aren't very bright are you???

I even started out the paragraph stating that SOME WILL TWIST IT SAYING I/WE ARE DEFENDING HIM

Answer the question. In your previous post, are you defending him or not? It’s a simple question.

 

[HacheMan]

Answer the question. In your previous post, are you defending him or not? It’s a simple question.

I've already answered that.

So have other posters in my defense.

You're not bright enough to decipher it.

 

[ThePoet]

6 incredible pages of absolute nonsense. Play Vancouver Canucks tonight and chill out.
GL!
The Poet

 

[PatsFan1283]

I'm not trying to get into a pissing contest with you as you can see. I replied to you respectfully in post #121

 

[Enfuego]

Ban you simply because others think you should be the same way you're saying you think GB should have been banned even before he went haywire

I never said before the gambling ring thing GB should be banned other than a self banning for his bet with JC.

 

[Mobdeeper7239]

You don't call other posters creating a poll/thread asking he be banned is poking??

This is holy for them Hache. No matter the facts, they won’t let this go no matter what. They have their own account of how things went down and seem to forget how it all started. They aren’t man enough to ever admit it. Was GB wrong at times? Of course he crossed the line.....I wouldn’t have gone to the lengths Gb did to get back at people. But real talk- a lot of the shit he got was unjust. I legit was wondering why the hell are people upset about pictures. Blew my mind. Those threads would have pissed me off though if people wanted me gone because I was giving people visuals in threads in the offshore.

 

[Enfuego]

I'm not trying to get into a pissing contest with you as you can see. I replied to you respectfully in post #121

I’ve been respectful too but now I’m “not very bright” according to Hache.