[FONT="][URL="http://sportsbettingchamp.com/images/_notes/mlbversion3.pdf"][FONT="]http://sportsbettingchamp.com/images/_notes/mlbversion3.pdf[/FONT]
[/FONT][/URL]
The guy does win a ton of series, but this system even more than his others, will have you wagering on some of the worst teams, going against some of the best. Granite it's hard to win 6 games in a row against anyone, but your laying a lot of money, on teams that have been swept by the team their playing. Which means either A. that the team that did the sweeping is much better ( n u should probably bet on them), or B. that team just plays well against the other and has a mental edge. Either way i'm sure he'll win close to 70 lose like 3 that decimate his bankroll and make it impossible to have a winning season, then put some meaningless filter so he can market his system with 0 loses the following year.
[FONT="][/FONT][FONT="]
[/FONT][FONT="]
[/FONT]
Dam...tried to edit and wouldn't let me...here's what I wanted to post:
I can guarantee there won't be 70 plays (unless you add in the unofficials)...more like 40 and maybe even a little less than that...that being said, the system worked pretty good for me last year going undefeated, but there's simply not enough plays to recover from a potential loss...and there were 2 series that came close as hell to losing:
Texas won the C game vs Detroit by the run-line...and were down 4-1 top of the 8th when Cruz hit a 2 out, 2 run double...wound up losing 4-3...
Then we had the balls to the wall C game with the ChiSox vs Minny...down 2-0 in the 9th with 2 outs and 2 strikes, they hit back to back jacks off Nathan and wound up winning.
He only had one other C bet with the Cubs as far as I remember, so definitely not a bad percentage in terms of # of C bets...but if not for the Miracle in Minny and clutch daddy Nefi Cruz, there could easily of been 2 L's.
Bottom line...just be careful...i've backtested this system and there ARE more losses than what he claims.
-John
key to gambling = be careful
you wanna bet on the orioles over the yankees. be my guest. be smart and it should be profitable.
im thinking over either a labo money management system or maybe just holding out on bet a or not betting on bet c.
there are enough plays to where if yo ulose an a and b game you will still win $. you lose 2 c bets and you are hurting.
you wanna bet on the orioles over the yankees. be my guest. be smart and it should be profitable.
im thinking over either a labo money management system or maybe just holding out on bet a or not betting on bet c.
there are enough plays to where if yo ulose an a and b game you will still win $. you lose 2 c bets and you are hurting.
With correct money management anything can be profitable, you could go 1 n 70 n be profitable. C bets will be more than laying 400 like his description of the system will lead you to believe. Following his hockey which is probably his closest system to this in terms of how much money you will have to dish out to ensure a series win, to win 100 on a series, some C bets you had to lay over 5,000 dollars(no bullshit) to win that 100. First Timers Research some of his other systems, do what is comfortable for you, and by all means do not use JM's money management. All that being said, whens the first series i'm ready.Dam...tried to edit and wouldn't let me...here's what I wanted to post:
I can guarantee there won't be 70 plays (unless you add in the unofficials)...more like 40 and maybe even a little less than that...that being said, the system worked pretty good for me last year going undefeated, but there's simply not enough plays to recover from a potential loss...and there were 2 series that came close as hell to losing:
Texas won the C game vs Detroit by the run-line...and were down 4-1 top of the 8th when Cruz hit a 2 out, 2 run double...wound up losing 4-3...
Then we had the balls to the wall C game with the ChiSox vs Minny...down 2-0 in the 9th with 2 outs and 2 strikes, they hit back to back jacks off Nathan and wound up winning.
He only had one other C bet with the Cubs as far as I remember, so definitely not a bad percentage in terms of # of C bets...but if not for the Miracle in Minny and clutch daddy Nefi Cruz, there could easily of been 2 L's.
Bottom line...just be careful...i've backtested this system and there ARE more losses than what he claims.
-John
hno:
