i been on the jm wagon for two nba seasons and now my 2nd mlb and for the fiest year in nba i missed the losses thank god and went on a tear then did great in mlb
with that being said this nba season was wak and now mlb not good
peolp in the old thread way back would say ur gonna get crushed and me bein a newbee at the time was like whatever countin my chips but now i see this shit is wak and u will see to one day 2 losses in a season and its a waste of time we already got one
with that being said this nba season was wak and now mlb not good
peolp in the old thread way back would say ur gonna get crushed and me bein a newbee at the time was like whatever countin my chips but now i see this shit is wak and u will see to one day 2 losses in a season and its a waste of time we already got one
Give me a big *high five* for pulling in a gigantic win yesterday on
the Cubs! Before the game, I had said that never before have I even
seen such an amazing opportunity for us to place such an incredibly
sure-fire wager...well, as you now see: I wasn't kidding!
There was never any ounce of any kind of doubt whatsoever my mind
that the Cubs will pull away the win in their final game. A quick
look at the scoreboard tells the story: It's time to celebrate, as
our Cubbies came back strong to wipe out their opponent in the final
game just exactly as the MLB system has predicted
Our next MLB system bet will be in about a week
Did anyone else throw-up after reading this?...wat a fukin clown!
JM v1.0 2010 MLB Calendar, updated to 5.16.10
Here is the updated 2010, JM MLB v1.0 Calendar.
Hope this helps. d1g1t
View attachment BW - MLB - JM v1.0 SYSTEM - 2010 MLB SWEEP DATA 5.17.10.xlsx
Here is the updated 2010, JM MLB v1.0 Calendar.
Hope this helps. d1g1t
View attachment BW - MLB - JM v1.0 SYSTEM - 2010 MLB SWEEP DATA 5.17.10.xlsx
u guys are in for a rude awakening jm is so scared he didnt play the giants last night even though they played the padres again after being swept twice in a row he didnt even mention the series as non official like he always does! why??? bc he wants to act like the loss doesnt exist lol what a scam
san diego wins again 3-1 holy shit!!!!
san diego wins again 3-1 holy shit!!!!
11/12/2009 12:01 AM
john morrison allegedly defrauds player out of £8000
john morrison, the tout popular for his "john morrison Chase Betting System" which drew immense criticism for his collobaration with BetUS (SBR rating C-) to deal players off-market lines, is now being accused of defrauding a player out of £8000. The player states that john morrison promised to invest the money into his sports betting system in exchange for 10% of the winnings. Once the check was cashed, john morrison stopped replying to the players emails and failed to honor his side of the bargain. Players are advised to exercise extreme caution before sending money to "stake" anyone in a sports betting arrangement.
john morrison allegedly defrauds player out of £8000
john morrison, the tout popular for his "john morrison Chase Betting System" which drew immense criticism for his collobaration with BetUS (SBR rating C-) to deal players off-market lines, is now being accused of defrauding a player out of £8000. The player states that john morrison promised to invest the money into his sports betting system in exchange for 10% of the winnings. Once the check was cashed, john morrison stopped replying to the players emails and failed to honor his side of the bargain. Players are advised to exercise extreme caution before sending money to "stake" anyone in a sports betting arrangement.
How the scam works: When players sign up with BetUS through the Sportsbettingchamp.com website, BetUS identifies that player as a “Chase system” referral. When that player wants to make a play released by the tout, BetUS deals a unique, higher-priced line on that game for that specific player. It is similar to a grocery store changing price tags after they find out what you were sent to purchase.
thanks for last years information. you are a dumbass anyway for putting money into a book that has a rating of a D/C- when there are TONs of A rated books availablesecond, NOBODY and I mean NOBODY here is gonna stick up for JM and his personality.
F him anyway, everyone knows how the system works so I dont understand why people send him shit.
If you dont like the system dont play it, real simple.
ps. try not losing your whole bankroll on 1 play and see how your attitude toward something differs
Did a little backtesting yesterday on Morrison's system...everyone seems to know how last year went, but beyond that it's a mystery...so I started with '08 and went back through '05...I only did the AL East...here's what I came up with:
OFFICIAL PLAYS
'08 - 6 A wins, 3 B wins, and 2 Losses
'07 - 5 A wins, 4 B wins, and 1 Loss
'06 - 0 A wins, 1 B win, and 1 Loss
'05 - 3 A wins, 3 B wins
Total = 14 A, 11 B, and 4 L's = 25-4
UNOFFICIAL PLAYS
'08 - 2 A wins, 2 B wins, and 1 Loss
'07 - 4 A wins, 4 B wins, 1 C win, and 1 Loss
'06 - 7 A wins, 4 B wins, and 3 C wins
'05 - 6 A wins, 1 B win, and 2 C wins
Total = 19 A, 11 B, 6 C, and 2 L's = 36-2
And here are the losses if you wanna check em out for yourself:
OFFICIAL
'08 - TB (35-22) vs Bos (35-25), 6/3-5
'08 - Bos (61-45) vs LAA (64-40), 7/28-30
'07 - Bal (58-66) vs Min (63-63), 8/23-25
'06 - Bal (14-16) vs Bos (16-12), 5/5-7
UNOFFICIAL
'08 - Bal, 9/22-23
'07 - TB (38-60) vs Bal (44-54), 7/24-26
After seeing this many losses in going through ONE division, i've seen enough...it really doesn't make any sense to me to waste any more time backtesting...this is simply a SHIT system.
Now you can argue that some of these losses may have been filtered out by the RPI differential, but I think you'd just be acting naive...the Twins are currently 24-14 and own an RPI of .521...the following mediocre teams would qualify for an official play against the Twins if the series started today:
Florida - 20-19 - .519
Cincy - 22-16 - .516
Boston - 19-20 - .516
Colorado - 19-19 - .516
LAA - 18-22 - .513
Wash - 20-19 - .512
Mets - 19-20 - .507
As far as I know, there is no way to go back and find an RPI rating for a specific date in history...but from the ratings I gave you above, i'm sure you can see that MOST (if not ALL) of the official losses are indeed losses...AND...you can even make a case for the unofficial TB loss qualifying as an OFFICIAL loss.
Anyway...I hope this helps to open everyone's eyes...my eyes were certainly closed through all of last year and apparently I was VERY lucky...but history and percentages DO NOT lie...and since the system went without a loss last year, this can only mean that it's due for a double shot of losses this year.
So you've been warned...if you continue to follow this shitty system, you WILL lose...I guarantee it...and the only person to blame will be YOU...so hopefully you've got an unlimited bankroll...cuz you're gonna need it.
To everyone else, i'm happy to help!:toast:
-John
OFFICIAL PLAYS
'08 - 6 A wins, 3 B wins, and 2 Losses
'07 - 5 A wins, 4 B wins, and 1 Loss
'06 - 0 A wins, 1 B win, and 1 Loss
'05 - 3 A wins, 3 B wins
Total = 14 A, 11 B, and 4 L's = 25-4
UNOFFICIAL PLAYS
'08 - 2 A wins, 2 B wins, and 1 Loss
'07 - 4 A wins, 4 B wins, 1 C win, and 1 Loss
'06 - 7 A wins, 4 B wins, and 3 C wins
'05 - 6 A wins, 1 B win, and 2 C wins
Total = 19 A, 11 B, 6 C, and 2 L's = 36-2
And here are the losses if you wanna check em out for yourself:
OFFICIAL
'08 - TB (35-22) vs Bos (35-25), 6/3-5
'08 - Bos (61-45) vs LAA (64-40), 7/28-30
'07 - Bal (58-66) vs Min (63-63), 8/23-25
'06 - Bal (14-16) vs Bos (16-12), 5/5-7
UNOFFICIAL
'08 - Bal, 9/22-23
'07 - TB (38-60) vs Bal (44-54), 7/24-26
After seeing this many losses in going through ONE division, i've seen enough...it really doesn't make any sense to me to waste any more time backtesting...this is simply a SHIT system.
Now you can argue that some of these losses may have been filtered out by the RPI differential, but I think you'd just be acting naive...the Twins are currently 24-14 and own an RPI of .521...the following mediocre teams would qualify for an official play against the Twins if the series started today:
Florida - 20-19 - .519
Cincy - 22-16 - .516
Boston - 19-20 - .516
Colorado - 19-19 - .516
LAA - 18-22 - .513
Wash - 20-19 - .512
Mets - 19-20 - .507
As far as I know, there is no way to go back and find an RPI rating for a specific date in history...but from the ratings I gave you above, i'm sure you can see that MOST (if not ALL) of the official losses are indeed losses...AND...you can even make a case for the unofficial TB loss qualifying as an OFFICIAL loss.
Anyway...I hope this helps to open everyone's eyes...my eyes were certainly closed through all of last year and apparently I was VERY lucky...but history and percentages DO NOT lie...and since the system went without a loss last year, this can only mean that it's due for a double shot of losses this year.
So you've been warned...if you continue to follow this shitty system, you WILL lose...I guarantee it...and the only person to blame will be YOU...so hopefully you've got an unlimited bankroll...cuz you're gonna need it.
To everyone else, i'm happy to help!:toast:
-John
second, NOBODY and I mean NOBODY here is gonna stick up for JM and his personality.
F him anyway, everyone knows how the system works so I dont understand why people send him shit.
If you dont like the system dont play it, real simple.
ps. try not losing your whole bankroll on 1 play and see how your attitude toward something differs
ok tea bagged
email from JM:
John Morrison's Sports Betting Champ Official System Pick(s)
5/24 Boston [A]
Tampa Bay Rays
5/24 Toronto [A]
LA Angels
5/24 Chicago White Sox [A]
Cleveland Indians
Note: My MLB system has only lost 1 time in 6 years!
Note #2: There is also an unofficial series with Pittsburgh starting with the [A] bet if you wish to wager on them. The betting series is unofficial because the RPI difference between the 2 teams are just too great.
John Morrison's Sports Betting Champ Official System Pick(s)
5/24 Boston [A]
Tampa Bay Rays
5/24 Toronto [A]
LA Angels
5/24 Chicago White Sox [A]
Cleveland Indians
Note: My MLB system has only lost 1 time in 6 years!
Note #2: There is also an unofficial series with Pittsburgh starting with the [A] bet if you wish to wager on them. The betting series is unofficial because the RPI difference between the 2 teams are just too great.
